Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Assessment Brief *This document is for CU Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website
Assessment Brief
*This document is for CU Group students for their own use in completing their assessed work for this module and should not be passed to third parties or posted on any website. Any infringements of this rule should be reported to engagement@coventry.ac.uk
Module Title: Smart Manufacturing Technology |
Module Code: 212EN
|
Assessment Type: Coursework |
Assessment Number: 1 |
Study Mode: FT
|
Weighting: 60% |
Submission Date: 01/04/2022 |
Submission Time: 18:00 |
Campus: CUC,CUL,CUSC
|
|
Task: |
Background
The aim of this assignment is to expose and equip students with theoretical and practical expertise in modern digital manufacturing. This assignment is portfolio-based, comprised of the following components:
This assignment represents 60% of the module grade and will be made available on Aula at the beginning of week 1 (07/03/2022), for a submission due date of (01/04/2022).
Requirement
Essential Reading
Assignment 1 General Instruction
You are a recently integrated manufacturing engineer at DigiMech Manufacturing, a Smart Manufacturing enterprise, which is expanding their business to incorporate multiple machining / manufacturing processes. Due to this, the manufacturing engineers have been divided in two teams, each addressing the planning and development of a product database and its machining processes involved for manufacturing it from a blank piece to the final part. If the last digit of your ID is even, you are part of the turning team; if the last digit of your ID is odd, you are assigned to the milling team. To be able to carry out this task, you must, first, convert the 2D drawing into a 3D model/part. Then, you will plan, elaborate and carry out the required machining processes on the 3D model/part. You are required to carry out the 3D modelling to the required BSI standard using PTC Creo. You are also required to define the conditions, resources and specifications for each of the machining processes deployed in the manufacturing of the part.
Figures 1 and 2 depict the approximate shape of parts that are produced as part of the company portfolio. The operations required have been defined by contractor CAD/CAM engineers of client companies. Irrespective of the part (and, therefore, the team you are assigned to), the operations involve a volume rough machining, drilling, engraving and a finish machining.
You are asked to represent the listed machining processes on your created 3D model/part, which is made of Inconel 718 nickel superalloy:
For each machining operation, you are required to specify:
Figure 1: Part template for the turning team, with the dimensions based on the ID number.
Figure 2: Part template for the milling team, with the dimensions to be based on the ID number.
Very important guidelines that you must remember and adhere to:
Figure 3: Counter bore dimensions.
You are required to create a project report on the above contents. You must demonstrate your proposed machining operations by creating a recorded video, expected to last no more than 5 minutes. You are suggested to use one of the following tools:
to illustrate, in brief steps, the digital manufacturing processes adopted in your assignment.
Marks will be awarded for 3D representation, machining process setup in your recorded video demonstration and report:
Submission Instructions What you need to submit via Aula – Turnitin submission link:
What you need to submit as a OneDrive:
|
Completion of this assessment will address the following learning outcomes:
|
|
1 |
Understand and evaluate classic manufacturing and advanced manufacturing techniques and principles |
2 |
Analyse digital manufacturing concepts, cloud manufacturing principles, technologies and application |
3 |
Apply CAD/CAM knowledge in digital manufacturing simulation |
Submission Guidelines
There should be a title page which clearly identifies the following:
* Name and code of the module
* Title of the Assessment
* Assessment number
* Word count
The word count identified includes quotations and citations. However, it does exclude the list of references and/or the bibliography and, unless specifically stated, encompasses a discrepancy of + or – 10%.
Late Submission
If you are not able to complete your coursework on time due to extenuating circumstances*, the ONLY way to receive an extension (up to 5 working days) or a deferral (anything longer than 5 working days) is to contact engagement@coventry.ac.uk
Extenuating circumstances are defined by CU as ‘genuine circumstances beyond your control or ability to foresee, and which seriously impair your assessed work’. Please note that you will need to provide third party evidence to support your reasoning for requiring an extension or deferral. Your course tutor is NOT able to approve an extension or a deferral. If you have not completed the official forms and had your request approved, your work will count as not submitted and receive a zero mark.
Guidance Notes and Considerations
Referencing
Access, Foundation, Year 1 and Year 2:
You should use APA 7th edition style of referencing.
Referencing guidance can be accessed on the Library’s LibGuides pages.
Use of Sources and Information:
You can access high quality, authoritative information via the library. Use LibGuides to access Locate, BibliU and research guidance.
Academic Writing Resources
There are a variety of academic writing resources available which can be accessed via LibGuides. These writing guides can help with different types of assessment as well as important writing skills needed for university.
Glossary of Assessment Terms for Assessment Writing – this is an a-z that covers the majority of terms used in assessment briefs, learning outcomes and feedback throughout the CU Group. If you would like any further support with your assessment, you can contact your Academic Writing Developer or visit the Academic Writing LibGuides page.
If you would like to book an Academic Writing appointment for support with your assessment, you can contact your Writing Developers:
CUC: learningservices.cuc@coventry.ac.uk
CUS: academicskills.cus@coventry.ac.uk
CUL Dagenham: academicwritingservice@cul.coventry.ac.uk
CUL Greenwich: awsgreenwich.cul@coventry.ac.uk
Academic Integrity Guidance
The best way to avoid academic misconduct is to follow appropriate academic and referencing conventions. Further guidance on academic integrity and conduct can be found using LibGuides.
Collusion between students (where sections of your work are similar to the work submitted by other students in this or previous module cohorts) is taken extremely seriously and will be reported to the Academic Conduct Panel. This applies to all coursework and exam answers. If you would like more guidance on understanding collusion, you can find it on LibGuides.
If an assessment suspected of involving a breach of academic integrity is found to display a marked difference in writing style, knowledge and skill level from that demonstrated elsewhere on the course, you may be required to undertake a Viva Voce in order to prove the coursework assessment is entirely your own work.
Proofreading of assessments by CU approved proofreaders is permitted. There is a list of approved proof readers along with guidelines for use. However, please remember that proofreading is a lengthy and detailed process for which there is a cost. If you decide to use a proofreader, please take this into account and contact them at least 10 days in advance of your assessment deadline.
You must not submit work for an assessment that you have already submitted (partially or in full), either for your current course or for another qualification of this university, unless this is specifically provided for in your assessment brief or specific course or module information.
It is important to realise that as a student you should not submit all or part of an assessment for which you have already received academic credit, to be used for an assessment in a different module. Reusing your own work in this way is called self-plagiarism. Where you wish to refer to some of your own work you must reference it in the same way that you reference work by other people.
Criteria |
90-100 1st |
80-89 1st |
70-79 1st |
60-69 2:1 |
50-59 2:2 |
40-49 3rd |
30-39 Fail |
20-29 Fail |
0-19 Fail |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|