Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Theme: US & Foreign Policy In the early 1900's, the United States became a more active leader on the global stage

Theme: US & Foreign Policy In the early 1900's, the United States became a more active leader on the global stage

History

Theme: US & Foreign Policy In the early 1900's, the United States became a more active leader on the global stage. Various strategic and economic factors led to a greater focus on foreign affairs and debates over the United States' role in the world. Engaging in the Spanish American War, establishing a sphere of influence over Latin America, and annexing the Philippines and Hawaii, the United States began to show the world that it wasn't an isolationist nation any longer. Task: Describe two social, political, and/ or economic factors that led to the United States changing its foreign policy in the late 1800's and early 1900's. Describe two examples of this shift in foreign policy by explaining two examples of foreign policy actions Explain what happened Explain one cause and one effect of this foreign policy action Some suggestions you may wish to consider - Factors: Economic - Industrialization, need for more natural resources Political - Roosevelt Corollary =Social - White Man's Burden, Manifest Destiny Foreign policy actions Spanish - American War and invasion of Cuba US . Philippine War Annexation of Hawaii Expansion of the sphere of influence in Latin America Panama Canal US in World War Rejection of Treaty of Versailles and League of Nations

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

 

The change in US foreign policy was enhanced by several factors that were economic, social, and political perspectives. On the social aspect, the white man's burden and manifest destiny significantly impacted the foreign policy formulation. First, manifest destiny enhanced negotiations that involved Britain over legal ownership of the Oregon Territory. It also rose the thirst to amass more areas after the successful Mexican war, however after the civil war, the policy continued to be the driving force in foreign policy implementation (Cox et al., 2018). As a result, Alaska was bought from Russia in 1867, and the connection was enhanced with other US territories.
White Man's Burden applauded the US to assume colonial responsibilities and various countries. The document informed the cost incurred, which comprised resources and personnel in battlefields and administrators in territories. The economic perspective included the need for increased natural resources to facilitate industrialization. The foreign policy accommodated various nations' relations despite the competitive business and differing ideologies like Russia (Gasiorowski & Mark, 2019). The countries cooperated since raw materials, ready markets, and laborers were obtained from various continents and passed via areas inhabited by diverse European races. Politically, Roosevelt's Corollary outlined that the US could intervene by applying military force to promote peace; this acted as an extension of the Monroe Doctrine. The policy proved the US was interested in international affairs and therefore needed to work within United Nations via aggressive roles in World. 
Several incidences exhibited the shift in foreign policy; first, the annexation of Hawaii; this happened after President Harrison presented a treaty to annex Hawaiian Islands to the US Senate for approval. Instead, in 1893, US troops took over the region after overthrowing Queen Liliuokalani. The US military policy towards Latin America focused on eradicating or monitoring military and economic impacts of territorial expansion, European powers, and promoting American trade (Hearl & Joseph, 2020). The two incidences resulted from US ambitions to control the World, hence raising its position as a superpower.
Work Cited
Cox, Michael, and Doug Stokes, eds. US foreign policy. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Gasiorowski, Mark. "US foreign policy and the shah." US Foreign Policy and the Shah. Cornell University Press, 2019.
Hearl, Joseph. "Racial Politics and the US Annexation of Hawaii." (2020).

 

 

Work Cited
Cox, Michael, and Doug Stokes, eds. US foreign policy. Oxford University Press, 2018.
Gasiorowski, Mark. "US foreign policy and the shah." US Foreign Policy and the Shah. Cornell University Press, 2019.
Hearl, Joseph. "Racial Politics and the US Annexation of Hawaii." (2020).

Related Questions