Question:

1) How did the 3/5ths Compromise manage the issue of slaves counting as a population?

answer.

The Three-Fifths Compromise was an agreement struck by the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787 regarding the counting of slaves when assessing a state's overall population. This count would determine the number of seats in the House of Representatives as well as the amount of taxation each state would pay. For the purposes of apportioning the House of Representatives, the agreement considered three-fifths of each state's slave population toward that state's overall population.

Despite the fact that slaves were not allowed to vote, Southern states received a third more Representatives and a third more presidential electoral votes than if slaves had not been tallied.

The compromise did not apply to free blacks or indentured servants, who were each counted as one whole person for representation purposes.

2)What determined how representation would be managed in relation to the Congress of the United States?

answer.

To balance the interests of both the small and large states, the Framers of the Constitution divided the power of Congress between the two houses. Every state has an equal voice in the Senate, while representation in the House of Representatives is based on the size of each state's population.

3)What institution established the way that the president was elected that counts the popular vote per state and has representatives cast their vote for the winner?

Answer,

 the Electoral College which was created by the framers of the U.S. Constitution as an alternative to electing the president by popular vote or by Congress provided the Constitutional Convention with a compromise between two main proposals namely: the popular election of the President and the election of the President by Congress. 

4)What was the plan that caused such a division between Hamilton and Jefferson?

Answer.

The division between Hamilton and Jefferson arose when Hamilton introduced his bill to establish a national bank, Jefferson objected. Speaking for those who believed in states' rights, Jefferson argued that the Constitution expressly enumerates all the powers belonging to the federal government and reserves all other powers to the states.

5. What conflict established the power of a strong central government in response to a tax protest?

Answer.

The tax protest movement is a relatively long-lived anti-government movement rising out of opposition to federal income taxes. Tax protesters generally believe that either the income tax laws are in some way invalid or that they do not apply to most citizens; therefore, they believe they have a legal and moral right not to pay taxes. Many tax protesters suspect that the government covers up the "truth" about the income tax in order to continue oppressing the people and taking their money. Tax protesters engage in a wide variety of tax evasion strategies that range from simple refusal to pay taxes to complicated schemes using onshore and offshore trusts in order to hide income from the government. Tax protesters are also violent on occasion, attacking IRS agents or property or others charged with enforcing the law. 

 

 

Step-by-step explanation

The above piece of writing is in accordance with the question's specifications and instructions.