help in homework

New User?

Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is owned by the city of Santa Monica

The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is owned by the city of Santa Monica

Law

  1. The Santa Monica Civic Auditorium is owned by the city of Santa Monica. The auditorium is rented out to various organizations throughout the year. The auditorium, which has a seating capacity of 1,500, is customarily leased for such events as rock concerts, rodeos, the Uce Capades, sporting events, fashion shows, etc. In January, Bruce Springsteen held a week long concert at the auditorium, drawing full houses each night. Generally, the city leases the auditorium's facilities for a charge of $2 000 per day.

    In February, the Hare Krishna religious sect applied to rent the auditorium for its annual Festival of Chariots celebration. However, Santa Monica City Council voted 7 to 3 against permitting the Hare Krishnas from using the auditorium. When their rental application was denied, the Hare Krishnas threatened to take legal action against the City Council. They contended unfair discrimination because Billy Graham and Reverend Ike leased the auditorium in previous months for their religious gatherings. During this controversy, the Santa Monica City Council passed an ordinance prohibiting the rental of the auditorium to any religious group. The City Council passed the ordinance in a "closed door" session, and did not permit any debate or hearings on the matter. Is this newly enacted Santa Monica city ordinance likely to be held constitutional?
    1. No, because the ordinance was passed by the City Council in a "closed door" session, it violates the due process rights of religious groups by not affording them an opportunity for a hearing
    2. No, because the ordinance discriminates against religious groups in violation of the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, as it is incorporated in the Fourteenth Amendment.
    3. Yes, because the ordinance treats all religious groups equally.
    4. Yes, because a city ordinance is not state action per se, and, therefore, it is not subject to the limitations of the Fourteenth Amendment.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

. No, because the ordinance discriminates against religious groups in violation of the free exercise clause of the First Amendment, as it is incorporated in the Fourteenth Amendment.

Step-by-step explanation

The Free Exercise Clause guarantees the right of American people to hold any religion beliefs they want and to participate in religious ceremonies of their choosing. Constitutional free-exercise clauses state that religious opinion, exchange of opinions, and behavior were all explicitly protected by the Free Exercise Clause under the First Amendment. 

 

The Religious Freedom Restoration Clause protects not just religious beliefs but also acts taken on support of such religious convictions. the scenario clearly demonstrates a religious act that is in support of belief and that was denied to the believers of the Hare Krishna religious sect 

Sitejabber (5.0)

BBC (5.0)

Trustpilot (4.9)

Google (5.0)