Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / QSO 435 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric In Milestone Three, you will submit a position paper targeted for the vice president of Operations at your scenario organization
QSO 435 Milestone Three Guidelines and Rubric
In Milestone Three, you will submit a position paper targeted for the vice president of Operations at your scenario organization. You will present the PMO position and recommendation for this project that builds upon your previous information paper and decision paper.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
Guidelines for Submission: Your Milestone Three submission, Analysis and Project Framework position paper, must be 1–2 pages in length (plus a cover page and references) and must be written in APA format. Use double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Include at least three references cited in APA format.
|
Critical Elements |
Exemplary (100%) |
Proficient (85%) |
Needs Improvement (55%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
|
Nontraditional PM Frameworks |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, reviews various types of project management approaches, and builds upon the information and decision papers from Modules One and Two; submission is well organized and detailed to a level that shows keen insight into the nuances, risks, and benefits |
Reviews various types of project management approaches and builds upon the information and decision papers from Modules One and Two; describes each approach based on specific references to the previous analysis |
Reviews various types of project management approaches and builds upon some of the information and decision papers from Modules One and Two, but does not make specific references to previous analysis or lacks necessary detail |
Does not review types of project management approaches, or does not build upon the information and decision papers from Modules One and Two |
22.5 |
|
Characteristics in Organization That Support an APM Approach |
Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides clear linkages between the organization and the unique requirements of the project |
Thoroughly describes the characteristics in the organization that support an adaptive project management (APM) approach |
Describes the characteristics in the organization that support an adaptive project management (APM) approach with some gaps in description and/or missing key details |
Does not describe the characteristics in the organization that support an adaptive project management (APM) approach |
22.5 |
|
Non-TPM Approaches |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and analysis identifies the key capabilities and limitations, linking back to the scenario project without superfluous information |
Accurately analyzes three nontraditional project management frameworks to identify the capabilities and limitations of each |
Analyzes three nontraditional project management frameworks, but does not identify the capabilities and limitations of each |
Does not analyze three nontraditional project management frameworks |
22.5 |
|
Select Project Management Approach |
Meets “Proficient” criteria, and reasoning shows thorough analysis of various aspects in context with the chosen project |
Selects project management approach with thorough defense of why it is most appropriate; includes explanation of why a traditional approach should not be used |
Selects project management approach, but does not provide a thorough defense of why it is most appropriate and/or does not include an explanation of why a traditional approach should not be used |
Does not select a project management approach |
22.5 |
|
Articulation of Response |
Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format |
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization |
Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas |
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas |
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earned Total |
100% |
