Answer:
A. Factors indicating a going concern issue:
-
- Drop in demand for products based on general economic conditions and increased competition
- High gearing (high debt/equity ratio) means little capacity for further borrowing
- Recent borrowings due for renewal 3 months after year-end, but no agreement reached with the bank
- Potential difficulties borrowing from other banks because of economic conditions and fall in demand for entity’s products
Mitigating factors:
-
- High expertise within the company suggesting ability to make new sales contracts despite economic conditions and competition
- Borrowings were used to purchase assets which have potential resale value
- Ongoing negotiations with another bank to refinance debt
- Possible cost-cutting (e.g. staff layoffs could be explored)
- Audit reporting options are detailed in ASA 570 Going Concern – See the flowchart in Appendix 1 (Linking going concern considerations and types of audit opinion). Essentially, the auditor must consider the degree of uncertainty surrounding the going concern and assess the adequacy of management’s disclosures in the financial report. The greater the degree of uncertainty around the going concern assumption and the less satisfactory the management’s disclosures, the more likely that the auditor will qualify the audit report. An emphasis of matter paragraph could be added to draw the reader’s attention to the doubts and mitigating factors if the auditor believes that the management has made sufficient disclosure.
The flowchart in ASA 570 could be summarised as follows:
-
- If there is not sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base an opinion
- Express a qualified opinion or disclaimer of opinion due to limitation of scope
- If the doubts about entity’s ability to continue as a going concern are not significant, the audit report would be unqualified.
- If the doubts are significant but the additional audit procedures confirm the appropriateness of the going concern assumption, then if the mitigating factors are
-
-
- adequately disclosed, the audit report is unqualified
- not adequately disclosed, the audit report is qualified for inadequate disclosure
- If the doubts are significant and the additional audit procedures do not confirm the appropriateness of the going concern assumption,
- if there is adequate disclosure of all material uncertainties in the financial report, the audit report is unqualified with an emphasis of matter paragraph
-
-
- if there is not adequate disclosure of all material uncertainties in the financial report, the audit report is
- qualified for inadequate disclosure if the matter is not pervasive
-
-
-
- adverse opinion for inadequate disclosure if the matter is pervasive
- If there is significant doubt the entity will continue as a going concern
- Adverse opinion for inadequate disclosure