Replying Discussion A 1

1. During the quest for territories and cultural superiorities, architecture and artwork manifested. The concrete revolution was a game-changer for the Romans architects. Since it was cheap and good for construction, it has lasted the construction for some time. The Romans artists have revolution their artwork up to human features preference mostly in their sculptures. The Greeks greatly influenced their art by showing the youthfulness of their emperors, unlike Romans, who portrayed all the human features art of their emperors.

2. The Greeks fought for their city-states to achieve their superiority, as evidenced by Athens, Sparta, and Corinth, who fought over border disputes. Athens and Sparta had different tactics to obtain superiority, thus the difference in their ideological view. The Romans collaborated with their colonial empires in the food industry, like Chicken Tikka in England. Rome is believed to be superior due to things such as national conquered.

Analyzing Readings

Eleanor Novek provides a chronology of how segregation in the real estate sector has evolved in her passage "You Wouldn't Fit Here." She describes what it was like and how it is still going strong after finishing in 1964. He also illustrates how brokers and financial institutions work together to keep African Americans out of white neighborhoods. She also discusses several examples of prejudice and how the government has opted to address it through the Equal Housing Opportunity Act.

There was quite significant info to acquire from the message after you reviewed the page "You Wouldn't Fit Here." The text appears to be deceived by the way people trust everything. People suffering from their devotion to one another and leaving their bots to deal with everything seem to have lost their way. The author addresses the mentally damaged audience that the bots are the way to and for everything. The audience in the writer's material seems to have lost love, affection, and kindness among themselves and a sense of humor. The material of the public was blocked by the writer's message (Eleanor 425). The authors begin their message by denouncing the act that the bots can accomplish anything you can. The writer starts by saying, "I give you that you can make machines do everything from mistakes, but you can never build one to do X (Eleanor 425).

It is apparent from the statement that the author is irritated, that he continues and provides a selection of his audience to be friendly and kind, with humor, all the human traits. He also invites others to think about them. The author aims to sound those who are uneducated and let machines manage their work. The people establish a concept theory to excuse their acts by arguing that devices are intended for little tasks only. Yet, it is apparent that, in general, people run away from the task and lose their connections to their fellow-creatures. The people seem to have changed a lot; for now, the author's concept of returning to the old guy is supported (man with feelings). Given that the message is spread, the writer may fulfill his mission.

The incapacity to appreciate strawberries and cream is one of the examples given in the writer's text. The idea that machines are incapable of making mistakes and, worst of all, machines might be subject to their thinking. According to the author, men's bonds are disintegrating at an increasing pace, and man is losing his human touch (Eleanor 483). The argument is powerful because the writer's concept may be tracked in today's technology. The writer appears to be challenging certain conflicting viewpoints in the post. He seems to believe machines can accomplish some of the man's tough jobs, such as mathematical processes, even though he opposes the relationship between machines and man.

The writer's tone is convincing; he can effectively communicate the message and impression to the reader. The writer's argument appears to be status in the workplace; he takes a line and supports it. The authors of the second post, "could you stop spending for one day?" plan to keep track of one's spending patterns. People's lives have grown so hectic that they feel compelled to spend money on everything they do. The author establishes the idea that man would not be able to thrive without spending.

The main idea in the article written by Mark Boyles is not to buy anything on specific days," Buy nothing day" (Boyles 535). The purpose of being achieved is a moneyless month. He is challenging the laypeople to understand the importance of "buy nothing day." The main intention is to want people to have one day off from shopping of any sort. Everyone to pick a specific month, preferably January, to be a buying nothing day. Mark wants the goal to be realistic and achievable (Boyles 535). In conclusion, he desires that we spare a month to buy nothing month, create our own rules and make them realistic considering the proper response to ecological and social factors that we face. In addition, he desires for us to stop a lot of the consumption habits and replace them with genuine relationships, thus leading to some savings.