Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Fitness and Health Promotion Health and Wellness Concepts FTHP 110   Assignment #2: Peer Reviewed Journal Analysis   Due: Week 13 – Tuesday, December 3, 2019 (Must be in Dropbox by 7 p

Fitness and Health Promotion Health and Wellness Concepts FTHP 110   Assignment #2: Peer Reviewed Journal Analysis   Due: Week 13 – Tuesday, December 3, 2019 (Must be in Dropbox by 7 p

Sociology

Fitness and Health Promotion

Health and Wellness Concepts FTHP 110

 

Assignment #2:

Peer Reviewed Journal Analysis

 

Due: Week 13 – Tuesday, December 3, 2019 (Must be in Dropbox by 7 p.m.)

Total Grade Value: 25% toward final grade

 

Note that you must have your professor approve your Peer Reviewed Journal article prior to beginning the assignment.

 

 

Description:

This assignment will display the students ability to find a suitable Health and Wellness Concepts topic of interest (in a peer reviewed journal article), and help them apply critical research methods learned in the course (from a high level perspective). It will also demonstrate the student’s ability to analyze a peer reviewed publication by understanding the validity of the chosen article, breaking down the type of data written about, understanding the main thesis, and being able to effectively summarize the research. The final two aspects of this assignment (the reflective journal questions and the summary presentation) contribute to the students learning process and initiation of critical research skills that will support future semesters.

Instructions:

PART A, B, and C together will be submitted as one assignment and total 2 – 3 pages in length.

PART D is the 5 minute summary presentation Week 13.

 

PART A – Identifying Validity and Analyzing Data

 

For PART A you are required to complete two sections. The first is to assess whether the article is “Valid” or not. Second you must look at the Qualitative vs Quantitative Data in the article.

 

To assess the Validity of your article you must evaluate the following 4 credentials. Then you may write up a simple 4 row chart that includes 3 columns “Credentials”, “Valid Y/N”, “Example”. In the Example column you may use more than one example.

 

Below are 4 specific and different credentials you can assess to determine whether an article is valid:

 

1. Dates: You can check the date of the article and the date of the research it uses – is it Current?

2. Source(s): You can verify the Source of information (ie/ is the author(s) credible?).

3. Background: You can assess the credentials of the author by looking at his/her academic standing (ie. where did they get educated), what experience do they have, and what is their reputation like.

4. References: You can evaluate the references and sources of information the author uses in the article.

 

Areas of assessment 1 – 4 will be discussed in detail in Lab.

 

With the assessment of validity complete you must next differentiate the variables (data) in the article. There may be only Qualitative data, or only Quantitative data or both.

 

Qualitative vs Quantitative Data – Refer to handout.

 

Remember the differences that:

· Qualitative data:

· Cannot be measured.

· Relies on observation and interpretation.

· A very fine piece of art, a good piece of art, a nice piece of art, a bad piece of art, a horrible piece of art.

· “The bird is blue”.

· Qualitative variables could be color, texture, and appearance.

· Quantitative data:

· Can be measured, it is based strictly on numerical measurements.

· “There are nine people standing in front of me”.

· 5 sacks of grain, 4 glasses of water, 2 cups of sugar.

· Relies on numbers.

· Quantitative variables include length, height, and weight.

 

Reviewing your specific article in detail, breakdown and describe (using examples from the article) your understanding of the quantitative and qualitative types of data as written by the author. Present your information typed in 2 to 4 paragraphs.

 

PART B – Summarizing Research

 

Demonstrating knowledge from LAB.

 

Understanding the Thesis – Refer to handouts/notes from Lab.

 

150 words summarize the Thesis and key points of your chosen article.

 

PART C – Reflective Journal

 

For the last component of this assignment write a Reflective Journal to conclude your learning experience. In order to do that reflect upon and answer the following questions:

 

· What was the easiest part of this assignment?

· What was the hardest part of this assignment?

· What skills do I most need to improve (reflect on your focus, attention, interest, patience, and commitment to the outcome)?

· How will I do that in the future? What are the steps I could take to improve in these areas?

 

PART D – Presentation of your Summary Part B and Reflection Part C

 

For the last component of this assignment a 5 min summary will be presented.

 

 

Rubric - Rating Scale

0

Work is missing, incorrect, or incomplete

1

Work does not meet criterion

2

Work meets criterion adequately

3

Work exceeds criterion; shows depth in insight and grasp of the learning, critical thinking skills, or attention to detail

 

Written Part A

Criteria

Ratings

1. all required credentials assessed

3 2 1 0

2. information is logically and clearly presented - chart

3 2 1 0

3. chosen examples support credentials

3 2 1 0

4. data is accurately identified as qualitative and/or quantitative

3 2 1 0

5. appropriate examples of data chosen

3 2 1 0

6. quality of writing reflects understanding of data in article

3 2 1 0

 

Total Points ____/18

 

Written Part B

Criteria

Ratings

1. thesis is descriptively, accurately summarized

3 2 1 0

2. thesis is logically and clearly written

3 2 1 0

3. thesis summary demonstrates learner's understanding of the research article

3 2 1 0

 

Total Points ____/9

Written Part C

Criteria

Ratings

1. all 4 reflective questions are answered

3 2 1 0

2. reflective answers show insight and thought

3 2 1 0

3. reflective answers highlight personal learning process

3 2 1 0

4. honest full sentences descriptive answers provided

3 2 1 0

 

Total Points ____/12

 

Presentation Part D

Criteria

Ratings

1. organized, logical presentation style; within time limit

3 2 1 0

2. information is logically and clearly presented

3 2 1 0

3. presentation skills eye contact, pace, clear voice

3 2 1 0

4. speaking skills volume, tone, engagement

3 2 1 0

 

Total Points ____/12

Total Grade____________/25%

Name ____________________________ Date _______________

Evaluator's Signature ____________________________ Date______________

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE