Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / In your own words, summarize the Reconstruction Amendments

In your own words, summarize the Reconstruction Amendments

History

  1. In your own words, summarize the Reconstruction Amendments.

  2. In your own words, summarize the provided excerpts of Mississippi’s Vagrancy Law, Civil Rights of Freedmen, and Penal Code.

  3. In your own words, summarize the provided excerpts of the Texas Black Codes.

  4. In your own words, summarize General Reynolds’s report on the Conditions in Texas in 1868.

  5. In your own words and using the primary sources provided, please answer the following questions.  Were the Reconstruction Amendments effective in achieving their purpose in the years immediately following the end of the Civil War?  Why or why not?

  6. In your own words, summarize Henry George’s thinking in the provided selections from Progress and Poverty.

  7. In your own words, summarize Jacob Riis’s thinking in the provided selections from How the Other Half Lives.

  8. In your own words, summarize William Graham Sumner’s thinking in the provided selections of “On Social Darwinism.”

  9. In your own words, summarize Andrew Carnegie’s thinking in the provided selections of Gospel of Wealth.

  10. In your own words, and using the primary sources provided, please answer the following questions.  Who did Americans in the late nineteenth century blame for wealth inequality?  What did they think should be done about wealth inequality?

For this assignment, you will read several primary sources related to the material we covered for Quiz 1 and Quiz 2. A primary source is a document or other artifact created during the time period that is being studied. Primary sources can also be thought of as evidence or data.

When historians write about the past, they make their claims based on their understanding of primary sources. So, for example, the social media posts you make today will be used by historians in the future to make an argument about people in the U.S. in 2021. Similarly, we will look at primary sources from the past to make claims about people who lived in the past.

Following each primary source or group of primary sources, you will find a set of questions. Those questions are intended to help you think critically about the sources. You do not need to submit your answers to those questions for this assignment; they are there only for your benefit.

At the end of this document, you will find another set of questions, most of them asking you to summarize what you have read. Your responses to those questions will comprise your work for this assignment. Please use only the primary sources provided in this assignment to answer the questions, and please put all answers in your own words. You may paraphrase the sources provided, but please do not quote.

As the Civil War came to an end, Americans debated the end of slavery. While northerners agreed slavery should end, there were a wide range of opinions concerning what freedom should look like for newly freed Black Americans.

Ultimately, a variety of measures were taken in an effort to provide opportunity for free Blacks. None were more significant than passage of three constitutional amendments--known as the Reconstruction Amendments--designed to give Black Americans political and legal rights.

Thirteenth Amendment (1865)

Amendment XIII

Section 1.

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

Fourteenth Amendment (1868)

Amendment XIV

Section 1.

All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.



 

Fifteenth Amendment (1870)

Amendment XV

Section 1.

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.

*

Reading Questions

  1. What does the Thirteenth Amendment do?

  2. What exception does the Thirteenth Amendment include?

  3. According to the Fourteenth Amendment, what are the two ways a person can become a U.S. citizen?

  4. Why did the authors of the Fourteenth Amendment establish birthright citizenship?

  5. What does the Fourteenth Amendment mean when it says “no state shall . . . deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”?

  6. Which specific right was the Fifteenth Amendment designed to protect, and who was it designed to protect?


 

* * *

Many southern governments enacted legislation that reestablished antebellum power relationships. Mississippi and Texas (and other southern states) passed laws known as Black Codes to regulate black behavior and impose social and economic control. While they granted some rights to African Americans – like the right to own property, to marry or to make contracts – they also denied other fundamental rights.

Mississippi Black Code (1865)

Vagrancy Law

Section 2. Be it further enacted, that all freedmen, free Negroes, and mulattoes in this state over the age of eighteen years found . . . with no lawful employment or business, or found unlawfully assembling themselves together either in the day or nighttime, and all white persons so assembling with freedmen, free Negroes, or mulattoes, or usually associating with freedmen, free Negroes, or mulattoes on terms of equality, or living in adultery or fornication with a freedwoman, free Negro, or mulatto, shall be deemed vagrants; and, on conviction thereof, shall be fined in the sum of not exceeding, in the case of a freedman, free Negro, or mulatto, 150, and a white man, $200, and imprisoned at the discretion of the court, the free Negro not exceeding ten days, and the white man not exceeding six months….

. . .

Section 7. Be it further enacted, that if any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto shall fail or refuse to pay any tax . . . it shall be prima facie evidence of vagrancy, and it shall be the duty of the sheriff to arrest such freedman, free Negro, or mulatto, or such person refusing or neglecting to pay such tax, and proceed at once to hire, for the shortest time, such delinquent taxpayer to anyone who will pay the said tax, with accruing costs, giving preference to the employer, if there be one.

Civil Rights of Freedmen

Section 7. Be it further enacted, that every civil officer shall, and every person may, arrest and carry back to his or her legal employer any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto who shall have quit the service of his or her employer before the expiration of his or her term of service without good cause, and said officer and person shall be entitled to receive for arresting and carrying back every deserting employee aforesaid the sum of $5, and 10 cents per mile from the place of arrest to the place of delivery, and the same shall be paid by the employer, and held as a setoff for so much against the wages of said deserting employee:

Penal Code

Section 1. Be it enacted by the legislature of the state of Mississippi, that no freedman, free Negro, or mulatto not in the military service of the United States government, and not licensed so to do by the board of police of his or her county, shall keep or carry firearms of any kind, or any ammunition, dirk, or Bowie knife; and, on conviction thereof in the county court, shall be punished by fine, not exceeding $10, and pay the costs of such proceedings, and all such arms or ammunition shall be forfeited to the informer; and it shall be the duty of every civil and military officer to arrest any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto found with any such arms or ammunition, and cause him or her to be committed for trial in default of bail…

. . .

Section 5. Be it further enacted, that if any freedman, free Negro, or mulatto convicted of any of the misdemeanors provided against in this act shall fail-or refuse, for the space of five days after conviction, to pay the fine and costs imposed, such person shall be hired out by the sheriff or other officer, at public outcry, to any white person who will pay said fine and all costs and take such convict for the shortest time.

Texas Black Codes (1868)

Chapter LIX,

Section 1 . . . 3rd. Persons of color shall not testify, except where the prosecution is against a person who is a person of color ; or where the offence is charged to have been committed against the person or property of a person of color. . . .

Chapter LXXX, An Act regulating Contracts for Labor.

SEC. 2. Every laborer shall have full and perfect liberty to choose his or her employer, but when once chosen, they shall not be allowed to leave their place of employment, until the fulfillment of their contract, unless by consent of their employer, or on account of harsh treatment or breach of contract on the part of the employer, and if they do so leave without cause or permission, they shall forfeit all wages earned to the time of abandonment.

SEC. 8. In case of sickness of the laborer, wages for the time lost shall be deducted, and, when the sickness is feigned, for purposes of idleness and also, on refusal to work according to contract, double the amount of wages shall be deducted for the time lost and, also, when rations have been furnished, and should the refusal to work continue beyond three days, the offender shall be reported to a Justice of the Peace or Mayor of a town or city and shall be forced to labor on roads, streets and other public works, without pay, until the offender consents to return to his labor.

SEC. 9. [The employee] shall obey all proper orders of his employer or his agent, take proper care of his work-mules, horses, oxen, stock of all character and kind ; also, all agricultural implements; and employers shall have the right to make a reasonable deduction from laborers’ wages for injuries done to animals or agricultural implements committed to their care, or for bad or negligent work.

Failing to obey reasonable orders, neglect of duty, leaving home without permission, impudence, swearing or indecent language to, or in the presence of the employer, his family or agent, or quarrelling and fighting with one another, shall be deemed disobedience.

For any disobedience, a fine of one dollar shall be imposed on, and paid by the offender.

For all lost time from work hours, without permission from the employer or his agent, unless in case of sickness, the laborer shall be fined twenty-five cents per hour.

For all absence from home without permission, the laborer will be fined at the rate of two dollars per day ; fines to be denounced at the time of the delinquency.

Laborers will not be required to labor on the Sabbath, except to take necessary care of stock, and other property on the plantation or to do necessary cooking or household duties, unless by special contract for work of necessity. For all thefts of the laborer from the employer, of agricultural products, hogs, sheep, poultry, or any other property of the employer, or willful destruction of property, or injury the laborer shall pay the employer double the amount of the value of the property stolen, destroyed or injured, one-half to be paid to the employer, and the other half to be placed in the general fund, provided for in this section,

No live stock shall be allowed to laborers without the permission of the employer. Laborers shall not receive visitors during work hours. All difficulties arising between the employer and laborers under this section, shall be settled, and all fines imposed by the former ; if not satisfactory to the laborer, and appeal may be had to the nearest Justice of the Peace, and two free holders, citizens, one of said citizens to be selected by employer, and the other by the laborer….

SEC. 10. Laborers, in the various duties of the household, and in all the domestic duties of the family, shall, at all hours of the day or night, and on all days of the week, promptly answer all calls, and obey and execute all lawful orders and commands of the family, in whose service they are employed, unless otherwise stipulated in the contract ; and any failure or refusal by the laborer to obey, as herein provided, except in case of sickness, shall be deemed disobedience, within the meaning of this Act.

And it is the duty of this class of laborers to be especially civil and polite to their employer, his family and guests, and they shall receive gentle and kind treatment. Employers, and their families, shall after ten o’clock at night, and on Sundays, make no calls on their laborers, nor enact any service of them which exigencies of the household or family do not make necessary or unavoidable.

Chapter LXXXII.

SECTION 1. …any person who shall persuade, or entice away from the service of an employer, any person who is under a contract of labor to such employer, or any apprentice, who is bound as such, from the service of his master, or who shall feed, harbor, or secrete, any such person under contract, or apprentice who has left the employment of employer or master, without the permission of such employer or master, the person or persons so offending shall be liable in damages to the employer or master, and shall, upon conviction, be punished by fine, in a sum not exceeding five hundred dollars, nor less than ten dollars, or by imprisonment in the county jail, or house of correction, for not more than six months or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Chapter XCII. An Act to prohibit the carrying of Fire-Arms on premises or plantations of any citizen without the consent of the owner.

SECTION 1. Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Texas, That it shall not be lawful for any person or persons to carry fire-arms on the enclosed premises or plantation of any citizen without the consent of the owner or proprietor other than in the lawful discharge of a civil or military duty and any person or persons so offending shall be fined a sum not less than one nor more than ten dollars or imprisonment in the county jail not less than one day nor more than ten days, or both, in the discretion of the Court or jury before whom the trial is had.

Chapter CXXVIII. An Act to define and declare the rights of persons lately known as Slaves, and Free Persons of Color.

SEC. 2. …nothing herein shall be so construed as to repeal any law prohibiting the inter-marriage of the white and black races, . . .

*

Reading Questions

  1. What did Section 2 of Mississippi’s Vagrancy Law forbid? What was the punishment for violating the law?

  2. What did Section 7 of Mississippi’s Vagrancy Law forbid?

  3. What did Section 7 of Mississippi’s Civil Rights for Freedmen establish?

  4. What did Section 1 of the Mississippi Penal Code forbid?

  5. According to Section 5 of the Mississippi Penal code, what was the penalty for Blacks who could not pay fines?

  6. According to Chapter LIX Section 1 of the Texas Black Codes, what limitations were placed on Blacks?

  7. According to Chapter LXXX of the Texas Black Codes, how were Black employees expected to behave? What were the consequences of failing to behave according to expectations?

  8. Who was discussed in Chapter LXXXII Section 1 of the Texas Black Codes? What was that group prevented from doing, and what was the penalty for breaking this law?

  9. What did Chapter XCII Section 1 of the Texas Black Codes forbid?

  10. What did Chapter CXXVIII Section 2 of the Texas Black Codes forbid?

* * *

By 1868, a variety of armed groups, wearing disguises, had emerged in Texas to intimidate former slaves. In addition to burning crops and stealing horses, these groups assaulted and even murdered blacks. The following document includes questions (and required responses) for those initiated into the KKK during Reconstruction.

Questions Asked at an Initiation to the Ku Klux Klan

1. --Do you belong to the White race?

Ans. –I do.

2. –Did you ever marry any woman who did not, or does not, belong to the White race?

Ans. –No.

3. –Do you promise never to marry any woman but one who belongs to the White race?

Ans. –I do.

4. –Do you believe in the superiority of your race?

Ans. –I do.

5. –Will you promise never to vote for any one, for any office of honor, profit or trust, who does not belong to your race?

Ans. –I do.

7. –Are you opposed to allowing the control of the political affairs of this country to go, in whole or in part, into the hands of the negro or African race, and will you do everything in your power to prevent it?

Ans. –Yes.


 

Most histories of the Civil War claim that the war ended in the summer of 1865 when Confederate armies surrendered. However, violent resistance and terrorism continued in the South for over a decade. In this report, General J.J. Reynolds describes the lawlessness of Texas during Reconstruction.

General Reynolds Describes Lawlessness in Texas (1868)

General: I have the honor to forward herewith annual tabular statement of expeditions and scouts, and reports of movements of the various regiments serving in this district, for the year ending September 30, 1868.

Armed organizations, generally known as “Ku-Klux Klans,” exist, independently or in concert with other armed bands, in many parts of Texas, but are most numerous, bold, and aggressive east of Trinity River.

The precise objects of the organizations cannot be readily explained, but seems, in this state, to be to disarm, rob, and in many cases murder Union men and negroes, and as occasion may offer, murder United States officers and soldiers; also to intimidate every one who knows anything of the organization but who will not join it.

The civil law east of the Trinity River is almost a dead letter. In some counties the civil officers are all, or a portion of them, members of the Klan. In other counties where the civil officers will not join the Klan, or some other armed band, they have been compelled to leave their counties. Examples are Van Zandt, Smith, and Marion counties; (the county seat of the latter is Jefferson.)

In many counties where the county officers have not been driven off their influence is scarcely felt. What political end, if any, is aimed at by these bands I cannot say, but they attend in large bodies the political meetings (barbecues) which have been and are still being held in various parts of this State under the auspices of the democratic clubs of the different counties.

The speakers encourage their attendance, and in several counties men have been indicated by name from the speaker’s stand, as those selected for murder. The men thus pointed out have no course left them but to leave their homes or be murdered on the first convenient opportunity.

The murder of negroes is so common as to render it impossible to keep an accurate account of them.

Many of the members of these bands of outlaws are transient persons in the State; the absence of railroads and telegraphs and great length of time required to communicate between remote points facilitating their devilish purposes.

These organizations are evidently countenanced, or at least not discouraged, by a majority of the white people in the counties where the bands are most numerous. They could not otherwise exist.

I have given this matter close attention, and am satisfied that a remedy to be effective must be gradually applied and continued with the firm support of the army until these outlaws are punished or dispersed.

They cannot be punished by the civil courts until some examples by military commissions show that men can be punished in Texas for murder and kindred crimes. Perpetrators of such crimes have not heretofore, except in very rare instances, been punished in this state at all.

Free speech and a free press, as the terms are generally understood in other States, have never existed in Texas. In fact, the citizens of other states cannot appreciate the state of affairs in Texas without actually experiencing it. The official reports of lawlessness and crime, so far from being exaggerated, do not tell the whole truth.

Jefferson is the center from which most of the trade, travel, and lawlessness of eastern Texas radiate, and at this point or its vicinity there should be stationed about a regiment of troops. The recent murder at Jefferson of Hon. G. W. Smith, a delegate to the constitutional convention, has made it necessary to order more troops to that point. This movement weakens the frontier posts to such an extent as to impair their efficiency for protection against Indians, but the bold, wholesale murdering in the interior of the state seems at present to present a more urgent demand for the troops than Indian depredations. The frontier posts should, however, be reinforced if possible, as it is not improbably that the Indians from the northwest, after having suffered defeat there, will make heavy incursions into Texas.

To restore measurable peace and quiet to Texas will require, for a long time, that troops be stationed at many county seats, until, by their presence, and aid if necessary, the civil law can be placed in the hands of reliable officers, and executed. This will be the work of years, and will be fully accomplished only by an increase of population.

*

Reading Questions

  1. In the initiation of new members of the Ku Klux Klan, what seem to be the most important issues to Klan members?

  2. In the initiation of new members of the Ku Klux Klan, what does the Klan seem to want to prevent Black people from doing? What does it want to prevent White people from doing?

  3. How did General Reynolds describe the activities of the KKK in East Texas?

  4. According to General Reynolds, why was Klan activity so widespread in East Texas?

  5. According to General Reynolds, how did Texas’s size and state of development contribute to the problems in East Texas?

  6. According to General Reynolds, what was needed to end Klan activity in East Texas?

 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

The Reconstruction Era

  1. In your own words, summarize the Reconstruction Amendments.

The reconstruction amendments were a series of constitutional amendments aimed at creating a unified Union with southern states and giving black people constitutional rights. The reconstruction amendments started during the Abraham Lincoln era, where he aimed to abolish slavery nationwide after disrupting slavery in the Southern states. There were still states in the Union that had slaves, including Maryland and Delaware. There was still deliberation on the rights and how the former slaves would fit into the country. When Andrew Johnson came into power, he allowed leniency in how the Southern states enacted the reconstruction bill to retract their ordinance of secession from the Union. The confederate states would allow black people their freedom under certain conditions, which showed they did not share the same laws and privileges as the white people. States like Mississippi would enact laws to make it a crime for any black person not to have a job. They would be taken to prison, where their services would be given to people who could guarantee they could pay taxes. The Republican Party would push for their rights, including electorate rights, to expand their voting bloc.

  1. In your own words, summarize the provided excerpts of Mississippi’s Vagrancy Law, Civil Rights of Freedmen, and Penal Code.

The vagrancy laws were discriminatory laws that ensured that black people were always at work. The laws also restricted the freedom of movement for black people and mulattos, characterizing them as an unlawful association. White people were also limited in their association with people of colour (Vagrancy Law). The Civil Rights of Freedom would guarantee employers would receive back their Negro and mulatto workers who had escaped from service without expiration of their term. The law ensured a monetary incentive to return every African American worker who would have escaped service. The employer would also receive the same compensation, and the worker would be obligated to pay both the catcher and employer from their wages (Civil Rights of Freedmen).  The Penal Code was a law that restricted the carrying of arms, ammunition or bowie knife by black people. It was an infringement on American Rights which allowed people to bear arms.

  1. In your own words, summarize the provided excerpts of the Texas Black Codes.

The Texas Black Codes were coded, which governed how black people would conduct themselves in the workplace. Black people could not provide testimony against white people in court; however, their testimony was valid against other black people. Black people were also not allowed to leave their employer without a due course when under contract. In case of sickness, no one should leave the employer for a substantial period. If an employer decides a labourer is avoiding work under the pretense, they were allowed to fine them about double their wages. The laws also encourage the workers to be somewhat submissive to the employer. They were obligated to be a call any time their employer needed their services. It was illegal to make an offer to an employee to entice them from their current employer. Workers were also not allowed to have visitations when they were working. Workers were also not allowed to have arms in a plantation or the owner’s premises.

  1. In your own words, summarize General Reynolds’s report on the Conditions in Texas in 1868.

The General Reynolds report was a description of the lawlessness in the Texas regions. The General describes the conditions which were brought about by gangs, including the Ku-Klux-Klans, which were responsible for terrorizing government officials and, to an extent, people of colour. White people who refused the offer to join or cede to the needs of the Klan were in danger of losing their lives. The General notes that the basic freedoms enjoyed in other regions were not present in Texas, including the freedom of speech. The groups attend large political meetings where they single out targets. The black people who have lost their lives under such gangs are so many that it is impossible to account for all of them. The lack of infrastructure in the region also made governance difficult—the general calls for a need for more military personnel in the frontier. Through serious government intervention, it would have been the only way to ensure that the Indians and citizens were protected.

  1. In your own words and using the primary sources provided, please answer the following questions. Were the Reconstruction Amendments effective in achieving their purpose in the years immediately following the end of the Civil War? Why or why not?

The Reconstruction Amendments were used to help unify the confederate states into the Union and also abolish slavery and give rights to black people. They can be defined to have been both successful and failures, depending on the scope. Under Andrew Jackson, he fought Civil Rights Act and also restricted efforts to unify the nation. He overturned the requirements Lincoln, his predecessor, put in that required confederate states to stop slavery in order to enter the Union. He provided provisions that enabled the Confederate states to continue with discriminatory practices. However, various amendments were passed, which helped with the Reconstruction process. The thirteenth Amendment stated that there should be no conditions for forced servitude in the United States (Amendment XIII). Additionally, laws were passed that stated that all people born in the US were citizens. Nobody could deny them the right to pursue liberty, own property, or equal legal protection (Amendment XV). On the Federal Level, the reconstruction period was successful in helping unite all the states and granted every citizen equal freedoms.

  1. In your own words, summarize Henry George’s thinking in the provided selections from Progress and Poverty.

In his book, Henry George warns about the inequality that was becoming apparent in America and the possible outcome the inequality could bring. Although industrial capitalism had brought about great progress to the economic wellbeing of the civilization, it had also brought with it a great difference in the haves and the have nots creating a great enigma in the time. Such inequality was enough to bring about challenges regarding social and political difficulties. The evils brought about by inequality were not a characteristic of the progress but were challenges that would bring the civilization to a halt. Under such inequality, beggars in the streets arise, high competition for the few employment opportunities, ignorance in schools, and political puppets who vote as their master dictates. Political equality is not enough in the face of such economic inequality. The nation honours liberty in stature, even going as far as setting statues for her. However, they do not fully trust liberty. Economic inequality creates a situation where we educate young people but deny them the right to make a living.

  1. In your own words, summarize Jacob Riis’s thinking in the provided selections from How the Other Half Lives.

One half of the world is unaware of how the other half lives because they do not care to understand the plight of others. The growth of the industrial opportunity in the Cities had seen countless people flock into the cities from various regions. The tenements in the towns became the place where they would live in hundreds of thousands under conditions that were not conducive for human dwelling. The conditions would be an environment for disease to grow. The disease which affected the poor and the rich alike would originate from the poor sanitary conditions afforded to people who dwelled in such housing. There has been an inquiry over what could be the problem with both Christian agencies and state agencies doing their part in trying to answer the questions. Well-off people came up with the suburbs where they could live together and avoid seeing the plight of other people. Such conditions are also rampant with a crime whose perpetrators are those who fill the jails in society.

  1. In your own words, summarize William Graham Sumner’s thinking in the provided selections of “On Social Darwinism.”

Nature provides the premise of competition for all men in existence. Inequality is a characteristic of having free will and liberty. In a society with liberty and free will, nature rewards those who are able to work and denies those who are not good. It is important to note that resources are limited, and there would never be enough. Therefore, the purpose of liberty is not to ensure that the society is equal, rather it is to ensure that the competition is fair and the brute nature of man is curbed. Inequality can be addressed by taking from those who have been rewarded by nature and giving to those who have not done enough to be rewarded. Giving to those who have done worse would ensure the society will disintegrate. It would go against the natural and would favour survival for the most unfit. The emphasis on equality would mean that men with tools should have as much as those who do not have tools. Teaching young people that it is wrong to be richer or have more than your neighbour would be amiss.

  1. In your own words, summarize Andrew Carnegie’s thinking in the provided selections of Gospel of Wealth.

In the modern age, the challenge that arises with wealth distribution would be the ties of brotherhood among the rich and the poor. The change in wealth distribution has seen a big difference in the palace of the rich and the cottage of the poor. However, such a change should be welcomed and not criticized and frowned upon. The difference shows the progress of the human race. Hundreds of years ago, there was no difference between the residence of those who had and those who had not. The conditions now mean that some individuals are richly blessed and richer than those in the past. However, they show the progress which the human race has made. It is better that some individuals can live a life of prosperity instead of everyone in the human race living in squalor. The romanticization of the ‘good old times’ should cease. The modern age ushers a new era of prosperity where the rich have an obligation to the poor and those who serve them in sharing knowledge and experience.

  1. In your own words, and using the primary sources provided, please answer the following questions. Who did Americans in the late nineteenth century blame for wealth inequality? What did they think should be done about wealth inequality?

In the nineteenth century, Americans seemed to blame the rich people for wealth inequality. However, others seemed to have contempt for the whole structure, which allowed some people to get excessively rich. As Jacob Riis notes, the rich secluded themselves in the suburbs to not have to see the tribulations that other people went through in their daily affairs (“Jacob Riis, How the Other Half Lives”). The assessment shows that they perceived rich people as being contemptuous of other people. The solution to what should be done depended on the various individuals. Henry George understood the tribulations to society such levels of inequality brought about but noted that finding a plan to address within the bounds of liberty was a complex political, religious and social issue that the human race has never addressed (“Henry George, Progress and Poverty, Selections”). However, looking at the writings of Graham and Carnegie, it is possible to speculate on some of the proposed solutions. Carnegie asserts that a world where everyone is poor is not ideal and that inequality is characteristic of progress (“Andrew Carnegie’s Gospel of Wealth”). On the other hand, Graham offers a rebuttal to what might seem like a Marxist solution of taking from the rich and giving to the poor (“William Graham Sumner on Social Darwinism”). He notes that nature rewards those who do well, and such an approach would be contrary to the natural law.