Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / BUSI 682 DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW As you read the chapters assigned to each module, no doubt you will find some concepts more interesting and applicable to your personal or work situation than others

BUSI 682 DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW As you read the chapters assigned to each module, no doubt you will find some concepts more interesting and applicable to your personal or work situation than others

Business

BUSI 682 DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS OVERVIEW As you read the chapters assigned to each module, no doubt you will find some concepts more interesting and applicable to your personal or work situation than others. Select one topic to discuss in detail. • • • • Discussion: Leadership and Strategy Discussion: Communications and Culture Discussion: Influencing and Negotiating Discussion: Teams and Learning INSTRUCTIONS Please be sure to include the exact Key Concept you selected in your Discussion subject line. After you have successfully picked the concept that interests you the most, research at least five (5) recent scholarly articles that relate to the concept on which you wish to focus your research. Articles may be found in reputable professional and scholarly journals that deal with the content of our course. Popular general reading magazines and online sources such as Wikipedia are not permissible. I highly recommend you use the Liberty University Library resources. Librarians are available to assist you in all matters pertaining to conducting your research, including what constitutes a scholarly article. After reading the articles, select the one article that you wish to discuss. The Discussion is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Modules. You must adhere precisely to the following headings and format: Key Concept and Why You Are Interested In It After reading the textbook, specifically state why you are interested in conducting further research on this topic, i.e., academic curiosity, application to a current issue related to employment, or any other professional rationale. Please be sure to include a substantive reason, not simply a phrase. Explanation Of The Key Concept This is a clear and concise overview of the essentials relevant to understanding this key concept. Major Article Summary Using your own words, provide a clear and concise summary of the article, including the Page 1 of 3 BUSI 682 major points and conclusions. Discussion (In your own words, discuss each of the following points) 1. How the cited work relates to your above explanation AND how it relates specifically to the content of this module. This part of your Discussion provides evidence that you have extended your understanding of this topic beyond the textbook readings. 2. How the cited work relates to the other 4 works you researched. This part of your Discussion provides evidence that you have refined your research topic to a coherent and specialized aspect of the topic, rather than a random selection of works on the topic. The idea here is to prove you have focused your research and that all works cited are related in some manner to each other – rather than simply a collection of the first 5 results from your Internet search. Annotated References A minimum of 5 scholarly business references (not textbooks, Wikipedia, or other popular reading magazines), in APA format (APA current edition), and must contain persistent links so others may have instant access. In the event formatting is lost or corrupted when posting the Discussion, be sure to attach the Word document to your posting, as evidence your work was completed in the proper format. The annotations are designed to help your classmates in their understanding of the topic. • • • An annotated bibliography is a list of the journals and resources you used. Each citation is followed by a brief (usually about 150 words) descriptive and an evaluative paragraph, “the” annotation. • An annotation should: • Be approximately 150 words and is more than just several sentences summarizing the source/reference. • Present why the author is qualified to speak on the stated subject. • Summarize the source/reference. • Explain to the reader why the reference is important to the project management profession. • Communicate to the reader how the reference relates to the subject being discussed. The purpose of the annotation is to inform the reader of the relevance, accuracy, and quality of the sources cited. Please do not simply cut and paste from your sources, as this constitutes plagiarism. I have found that most of the time this occurs as an innocent oversight on the part of the student. Regardless of the reason, in the event of plagiarism, the student will receive zero points for the entire Module (this includes Discussion, Discussion responses, and participation). Please note that points will be awarded in each aspect of the assignment if the assignment meets or exceeds graduate-level content and writing standards. Page 2 of 3 BUSI 682 REPLIES Additionally, each student will be required to post a written response to two (2) other students' Discussion threads. Replies are due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of the assigned Modules. Except Modules 8, which is due by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Friday. Page 3 of 3 Influencing and Negotiating The most skillful project leaders have perfected the skill of being comfortable while being uncomfortable. Fast, cheap, good—you can have any two. We often ask participants in our leading global projects seminars this question, “What are the most important challenges you experience in your role as a leader of global projects?” The following are consistently mentioned. How can I better understand global counterparts and communicate effectively across cultures? How can I get real support from the steering committee? How can I motivate individuals to be enthusiastic about the project? What approaches can I use to influence others in a matrix organization when I am dealing with different cultures and functions and have little or no authority over those whom I am trying to influence? By far, the greatest challenge is the latter – influencing across functions and cultures. Our answer to this influencing question is as follows. First, we must understand how power and influence can be used effectively by leaders of global projects. Second, most project leaders would benefit from further developing and enhancing their negotiation skills, and related ability to deal with conflict, since an important component of influence without authority is negotiating and mediating conflict. Before we delve into influencing, negotiating, and dealing with conflict, we need to be clear on just what we mean by influence and how it differs from persuasion or manipulation. Manipulation is the dark side of influence or persuasion. We can use skillful persuasion and influencing tactics, but if we are manipulating we are by definition creating an unfair advantage. Taken to an extreme, the use of formal authority can easily cross the line into the realm of manipulation. Persuasion and influencing are highly related, but it is important to understand the subtle differences. Persuasion involves enticing someone into action largely through logic and reason. Influencing takes one further step in that those we are influencing feel a compelling force to take certain actions or behave in particular ways. In other words, I can persuade you to do some work on my project, perhaps by laying out the logic, but you may feel more cajoled than compelled. Influencing is more than making a persuasive speech. It involves truly understanding the world of the person being influenced and what that person really wants and needs, and then fulfilling those wants and needs. We return frequently throughout the book to this common theme of understanding others by looking through their lenses. Every individual in any organization has the ability to influence others and has a certain amount of power in the organization. The amount of power a person has is a total of the formal power that is given by the position the individual has in the organization plus the amount of informal power individualist has earned. Informal power is based on one's knowledge, expertise, reputation, networks, and interpersonal skills. Formal power is given to an individual by virtue of their position in the organization. By exercising formal power an individual has the ability to reward, punish, and to “tell people what to do.” We saw a sign recently in the lobby of a small business. It read, “The boss is always the boss.” That sign clearly states the “power” of the boss. In working with hundreds of project leaders in our seminars, we have come to the simple conclusion that most project leaders do not have the luxury of resorting to formal authority. In most cases, the boss is always the boss, but the project leader is
 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

  1. Key Concept and Why You Are Interested In It
  1. The concept of emotional intelligence in the topic, “Influencing and Negotiating,” is essential in influencing others to act on a given task or winning their trust in the negotiation process.
  2. I am interested in emotional intelligence to understand how emotions affect a leader’s ability to influence and negotiate with others.
  1. Explanation of the Key Concept
  1. Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to one’s ability to be aware of his or her emotions and emotions of others, to manage his or her emotions, and to manage others’ emotions (Black et al., 2020).
  2. According to Daniel Goleman, a psychologist who assisted in popularizing EI, EI has five core subcontracts, including self-regulation, self-awareness, empathy, motivation, and social skills.
  3. Studies suggest that EI has four different levels, including the ability to manage emotions, understand emotions, reason using emotions, and emotional perception (Schlegel et al., 2018).
  4. Several scholars claim that EI can influence people’s behaviors, such as group behaviors, work, social, and individual traits.. 
  1. Major Article Summary
  1. The article, “Self-efficacy and emotional intelligence: Influencing team cohesion to enhance team performance,” by Black et al. (2019), established that emotional intelligence enhanced self-efficacy’s development, increasing team cohesion.
  2. The researchers further noted that self-efficacy is an essential mediator between team cohesion and EI.
  3. According to Black et al. (2019), self-efficacy and the emotional intelligence (EI) of the team members are essential antecedents for team cohesion.
  1. Discussion

I.    How the Cited Work relates to the explanation

  1. Black et al. (2019) present critical insight regarding the impact of EI on influencing team cohesion and team performance.
  2. The cited work relates to the explanation of EI because it depicts how human emotions affect one’s ability to interact with others.
  1. How it relates to module content
  1. The module content delves into influencing others using either formal power or informal power. As per the module, influencing involves truly understanding others’ worldviews or perspectives, needs, desires, emotions, and wants.
  2. Black et al. (2019) show that team performance is a product of emotional intelligence and team cohesion.
  1. How the Cited Work Relates to the Other Researched Works
  1. The cited work relates other four articles because they all share similar findings on the effects of EI on negotiation, teamwork, performance, and other real-work endeavors.
  2. For example, both Black et al. (2019) and Bellucci et al. (2020) agree that EI shape how people interact, react, or negotiate with others.
  1. Conclusion
  1. In conclusion, emotional intelligence is an essential attribute that helps a leader influence others to achieve greater success and assists him to negotiate with others appropriately, thus reaching a middle ground.
  2. It is clear from the five articles that emotional intelligence can influence team performance, team cohesion, teamwork, communication, and collaboration.

 

Key Concept and Why You Are Interested In It

The concept of emotional intelligence in the topic, “Influencing and Negotiating,” is essential in influencing others to act on a given task or winning their trust in the negotiation process. I am interested in emotional intelligence to understand how emotions affect a leader’s ability to influence and negotiate with others. For a very long time, researchers have only focused on the decision-making and cognition process, thus ignoring the impact of emotions in negotiation and influencing others. In other words, few researchers have tried to explore the relationship between emotional intelligence and influencing and negation outcomes. Therefore, I am interested in the concept of emotional intelligence to understand how it influences negotiation processes. By researching “the influence of emotional intelligence on influencing and negotiation outcomes,” I will understand how emotions impact one’s ability to influence others in real-life situations.

Explanation of the Key Concept

Emotional intelligence (EI) refers to one’s ability to be aware of his or her emotions and emotions of others, to manage his or her emotions, and to manage others’ emotions (Black et al., 2020). In other words, EI is a person’s ability to understand and manage his or her emotions and the emotions of other people around him. Studies have shown that individuals with a higher degree of EI understand what they are feeling, what their emotions mean, and how their emotions can impact other individuals. For a leader, having EI is an essential trait for success, especially in projects or tasks that directly or indirectly affect others. Similarly, EI has a significant impact on individual employee performance and the general performance of an organization. Specifically, EI influences an organization’s performance areas, such as stress management, negotiation, teamwork, pro-social behaviors, creativity, leadership effectiveness, and creativity.

According to Daniel Goleman, a psychologist who assisted in popularizing EI, EI has five core subcontracts, including self-regulation, self-awareness, empathy, motivation, and social skills. Self-awareness assists persons in understanding and recognizing their drives and emotions and the effects of their emotions on others’ behaviors and emotions. Self-regulation is a human skill that allows one to redirect his or her impulsive moods. Motivation refers to concerns beyond status or money that compel individuals to focus on their goals. Empathy refers to one’s ability to discern and respond effectively to others’ emotions. Social skills assist people in building rapport with others, establishing common ground with them, and manage relationships effectively.

Studies suggest that EI has four different levels, including the ability to manage emotions, understand emotions, reason using emotions, and emotional perception (Schlegel et al., 2018). The first phase of understanding one’s emotions is to perceive them accurately. Perceiving emotions involve decoding nonverbal signals, such as facial expression, tonal variation, and body language. The next step, which is reasoning with emotions, involves using emotions to enhance cognitive activity and promote critical thinking. Emotions assist people in prioritizing what they react to or pay attention to. Considering that emotions can carry different meanings, understanding emotions is essential how it affects people’s behaviors. Therefore, one’s ability to manage emotions effectively is an integral part of EI.

Several scholars claim that EI can influence people’s behaviors, such as group behaviors, work, social, and individual traits. For example, Bellucci et al. (2020) established that EI could assist persons in coping successfully with environmental pressures and demands. Because individuals with higher EI are better able to redirect or control their disruptive moods and impulses, they are more comfortable handling difficult situations that trigger immense emotions, are open to change, and handle ambiguity easily. Researchers have established that people with a higher EI are more successful at communicating their intentions, goals, and ideas in powerful and exciting ways, thus winning others’ trust and loyalty. 

Major Article Summary

The article, “Self-efficacy and emotional intelligence: Influencing team cohesion to enhance team performance,” by Black et al. (2019), established that emotional intelligence enhanced self-efficacy’s development, increasing team cohesion. The researchers further noted that self-efficacy is an essential mediator between team cohesion and EI. They found that team cohesion was relatively high when each team member had a greater EI. Team cohesion entails the degree of closeness that persons in a group feel attached to. It is important to understand that self-efficacy refers to one’s belief in her ability or capacity to perform certain behaviors needed to realize specific performance outcomes and attainments. Black et al. (2019) argued that teams with a greater EI had a higher team cohesion, which is essential in realizing a higher team performance.

According to Black et al. (2019), self-efficacy and the emotional intelligence (EI) of the team members are essential antecedents for team cohesion. Simply, a team where everyone understands other team members’ emotions and manages their individual emotions tends to register a higher team cohesion, which bolsters team performance. Therefore, this study depicted that having team members with higher EI is imperative in realizing a greater team performance. This study is essential for managers in selecting and hiring team members with high levels of self-efficacy and EI. Alternatively, managers or team leaders can subject employees to train and education to assist them in internalizing increased levels of EI and self-efficacy.

Discussion

How the Cited Work relates to the explanation

Black et al. (2019) present critical insight regarding the impact of EI on influencing team cohesion and team performance. The cited work relates to the explanation of EI because it depicts how human emotions affect one’s ability to interact with others. It is clear from this cited work that emotions can impact not only people’s interactions but also their performance. As per the explanation, EI is made up of five elements, including self-regulation, self-awareness, empathy, motivation, and social skills. One can infer from the article by Black et al. (2019) that social skills, an element of EI, shapes how team members build rapport with others, establish common ground with them, and manage relationships. It is also evident from the cited work that team members can realize greater success when they have higher self-regulation and self-awareness.

How it relates to module content

The module content delves into influencing others using either formal power or informal power. As per the module, influencing involves truly understanding others’ worldviews or perspectives, needs, desires, emotions, and wants. Therefore, the cited work on emotional intelligence and team cohesion relates to module content because it depicts that emotional intelligence is essential in influencing others’ performance. For example, when a team leader understands his team members’ emotions, the leader can develop influencing strategies that auger well with them. Black et al. (2019) show that team performance is a product of emotional intelligence and team cohesion. This implies that the concept of emotional intelligence mentioned in the module has a greater impact on team performance. Therefore, it is undeniable that a leader with a greater understanding of his or her emotions can influence a team to achieve greater performance.

How the Cited Work Relates to the Other Researched Works

The cited work relates other four articles because they all share similar findings on the effects of EI on negotiation, teamwork, performance, and other real-work endeavors. For example, both Black et al. (2019) and Bellucci et al. (2020) agree that EI shape how people interact, react, or negotiate with others. Similarly, Black et al. (2019) and Schlegel et al. (2018) agree that people with higher EI excelled more in teamwork and negotiation than people with lower EI. Black et al. (2019) and Sharma, Agarwal & Gupta (2017) agree that human emotions affect one’s ability to interact with others. It is clear from Black et al. (2019) and Sharma, Agarwal & Gupta (2017) that emotions can impact people’s interactions and their performance. Zehetner and Kraigher-Krainer (2017) and Black et al. (2019) agree that higher levels of EI contribute to better negotiation results.

Conclusion

In conclusion, emotional intelligence is an essential attribute that helps a leader influence others to achieve greater success and assists him to negotiate with others appropriately, thus reaching a middle ground. It is clear from the five articles that emotional intelligence can influence team performance, team cohesion, teamwork, communication, and collaboration. When a leader is aware of his or her emotions and how his emotions affect others, he or she can learn how to interact with them properly, humanely, and peacefully. As a result, the leader can mobilize and motivate others to achieve greater performance. A leader can also use his or her emotional intelligence to bring people together, thus realizing greater success. Furthermore, emotional intelligence helps a leader to solve conflicts and disputes quickly, resulting in enhanced team cohesion.