Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / 1) Identify the various constructs and concepts involved in the study
1) Identify the various constructs and concepts involved in the study.
The various concepts involved in the study include the cause of the accidents, and also the feedback that is being received from several reports. State Farm then uses these concepts to clarify/understand the dangerous intersections. In addition, the concepts in this study included the characteristics of the crashes that occurred at the intersection as well. Some of the characteristics that State Farm included were the traffic that went through the intersection, the severity of the crashes, and whom the drivers were ensured by.
In this study, State Farm focused only on the driver that they covered. This was to avoid any claims being filed against them, and also because they care about the dangerous intersection accidents that were affecting the safety of their consumers. The dangerous intersection provided State Farm with a report of the accidents caused by the intersection, as they made a conscious effort to prevent more crashes through the improvement of the safer intersections in the United States. In the study, we see that cities with the highest number of dangerous intersections, also lead to a higher rate of accidents. Grants worth $100,000 were given to cities with the most dangerous intersection accidents. The research focuses on road safety engineering, criminal behavior, and traffic volume as well. The physical layout of the road is also very crucial to shaping the driver’s behavior during the intersections (Schindler, 2022).
2. What hypothesis might drive the research of one of the cities on the top 10 dangerous intersection list?
Hypothesis testing is used to test claims about population parameters based on sample data (Harrison, 2019). The hypothesis that might drive the research of one of the city's top 10 dangerous intersections list should be focused on the gross misconduct of the drivers, and how traffic conflicts due to high traffic volume led to the dangerous intersection. In addition, the different hypotheses that we could develop from this research would be created with the general research topic as well as expected results. In this situation, the cities of the top ten dangerous intersection list would need research on how to reduce the number of crashes in that particular intersection. Also, the hypothesis in this study will be focused on figuring out the main causes of the crashes as well. As I focused on this, I was reminded of Proverbs 19:2 which states “Desire without knowledge is not good, and whoever makes haste with his feet misses his way” (ESV). This relates to hypothesis testing because researchers need to thoroughly evaluate the issue and then implement effective measures to address the issue. This takes time, and no hasty decision equals a successful result in this scenario.
3. Evaluate the methodology for State Farm’s research.
In evaluating the methodology for State Farm’s research, I see that the methodology involves a collection of data from police reports, the study of traffic, benefit-cost analysis, and capacity profile of intersection. In addition, the choice of sampling and ranking the ten dangerous intersection lists lead to more effective and realistic findings. According to Crundwell, Sorting and categorizing the accident rates as well as traffic volume was beneficial in helping implement both short-term and long-term improvements.
The methodology for this research was vital in drawing patterns on issues leading to the intersection characteristics. This led to the improvement of efficiently handling loss prevention programs for the road sector. Unfortunately, the danger codes were narrowed down and focused on property damages/personal injuries. I believe that if the methodology had included a regression analysis on the property loss, and loss of lives then it would have displayed more substantial numbers on how dangerous the intersection truly was.
4. If you were State Farm, how would you address the concerns of transportation engineers?
If I was State Farm, I would address the concerns of transportation engineers by centering my focus on the implementation of the previous findings that occurred before the evaluation of the current state of the dangerous intersection. I also would strongly consider a grant disbursement that will be focused on the accident rate, including the accidents and traffic volume as well. Lastly, I believe that the engineers would be in a great position to reduce the risks where they occurred at high rates at the intersections.
5. If you were State Farm, would you use traffic volume counts as part of the 2003 study? What concerns, other than those expressed by Nepomuceno, do you have?
If I was State Farm, I would include the traffic volume counts as part of the 2003 study because I believe that It would be beneficial to the study as well. Cities with a high number of intersections have more accident rates as well. The other concerns I have would be focused on other means of transportation as a solution. Therefore, I would also consider railway transport which would be essential in reducing the dangerous intersection accidents rates on the road. Railroad transportation will reduce the traffic volume as well. As I focused on these concerns, I remembered Philippians 2:3 which states “Do nothing from selfish ambition or conceit, but in humility count others more significant than yourselves” (ESV). This relates to my stated concerns because, State Farm decided to put their consumers as significant, and I agree because we are called to love others like ourselves and count others as more significant as well.
