Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Describe the problem of free will and evaluate the main responses to it
Describe the problem of free will and evaluate the main responses to it.
Paper Grading Rubric Introduction to Metaphysics (Fall 2021)
Overall grade:
|
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Makes little mention of relevant content. |
|
Accurately explains some of the relevant content. |
|
Accurately explains most but not all of the relevant content and/or some explanations need more development. |
|
Fully and accurately explains all of the relevant content. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clarity |
|
|
|
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Explanations are largely unclear. |
|
Summarizes ideas instead of explaining them and most explanations are unclear. |
|
Most but not all explanations are clear and precise, and most but not all of the paper would be comprehensible to a generally intelligent person. |
|
All explanations are clear and precise. Paper would be comprehensible to a generally intelligent person. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Creativity |
|
|
|
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Paper does not develop any of the author’s own ideas. |
|
Paper focuses largely on the ideas of others; author needs to develop own insights. |
|
Argument is insightful, but it should be further developed in response to class readings. |
|
Shows fresh insight into the topic, and the author develops their own argument in conversation with class readings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Organization |
|
|
||
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Paragraphs are not organized and writing does not follow a clear and systematic narrative. |
|
Paper is focused in some places, but in other places the writing does not follow a clear and systematic narrative. |
|
Maintains clear focus throughout much of the paper, but some steps and/or transitions are unclear. |
|
Breaks the discussion down into distinct parts and demonstrates the logical relationships between those parts. Writing follows a clear and systematic narrative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
|
Spelling and Grammar |
|
|
||
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Extensive grammatical errors make the paper difficult to read. Many word choices are mistaken and/or confusing. |
|
Paper contains a significant number of mistakes. Many words are clear, but there are also significant problems with word choice. |
|
Paper has a small number of mistakes; it was proofread, but not carefully enough. Word usage and definitions are generally but not entirely precise. |
|
Paper has almost no grammar or spelling errors. Words are chosen for their precise meanings. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
|
Reasoning |
|
|
|
|
Poor (D or below) |
C/D |
Satisfactory C |
B/C |
Good B |
A/B |
Excellent A |
Does not establish a clear line of reasoning and piece contains minimal argumentation. |
|
There is some argumentation, but it is mostly unconvincing, and the overall line of reasoning is not clear. |
|
There is some argumentation, but it is mostly unconvincing, and the overall line of reasoning is not clear. |
|
There is an obvious, clear line of reasoning and the argumentation is straightforward and convincing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional comments |
: |
|
|
|
|
Already member? Sign In