Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / BBM208/03 Business Ethics Assignment (50%) Wirecard collapse explained & current situation 0ctober 13th, 2020 From brilliant rise to a spectacular fall – the story of the Wirecard collapse shocked millions of people, reputable investors, and banking regulators across the globe

BBM208/03 Business Ethics Assignment (50%) Wirecard collapse explained & current situation 0ctober 13th, 2020 From brilliant rise to a spectacular fall – the story of the Wirecard collapse shocked millions of people, reputable investors, and banking regulators across the globe

Business

BBM208/03

Business Ethics

Assignment (50%)

Wirecard collapse explained & current situation 0ctober 13th, 2020

From brilliant rise to a spectacular fall – the story of the Wirecard collapse shocked millions of people, reputable investors, and banking regulators across the globe. While Wirecard’s CEO Markus Braun was promising a smooth transition to a cashless society, it appeared that its corporate accounts were, in fact, cashless.

 

The Local Court of Munich – Insolvency Court – opened insolvency proceedings over the assets of Wirecard AG for 7 Wirecard subsidiaries in a ruling dated August 25, 2020. The court formally alienated all the decision-making powers from the business’s directors and executives.

 

How Wirecard collapsed

This summer, the payment processing of many companies was unexpectedly interrupted due to the troubles with scandalous German payment processor and

financial services provider Wirecard. On 26 June 2020, the British Financial Conduct Authority suspended its permission for Wirecard Card Solutions Limited to operate, without prior notice or warning. This has affected the activities of many companies relying on Wirecard in the financial sector. Although the restriction was lifted in a few days, the story didn’t end there.

 

 

In June, the Wirecard management decided to seek court protection as the company appeared incapable of covering all its debts. According to CNBC, the company revealed that €1.9 billion of cash on its balance sheet (about four-fifths of its total net cash) had gone missing. The investigation started by the Financial Times over a year ago suggested that the cash in question likely had not ever existed. At least, two Philippine banks where the money was supposed to be kept said that they had never dealt with Wirecard.

 

 

Along with the once successful payments company, this scandalous finding also affects the transparency of the operations of Germany’s financial regulator, BaFin. In July, BaFin was sued by Wirecard AG investors who claim the regulator turned a blind eye to the clear evidence of an accounting scandal that eventually led to the company’s collapse.

 

 

 
 
 

 

 

Previously, Tilp had filed a suit against Wirecard and its longtime auditor EY (Ernst & Young) which didn’t report any issues until 2020, although prosecutors recently found out that Wirecard representatives knew about massive losses as early as 2015.

 

The former Wirecard CEO Markus Braun, the former Chief Financial Officer, Burkhard Ley, and another Member of the Executive Board, the former head of accounting Stephan Freiherr von Erffa were arrested. Allegedly, they conspired to obtain about €3.2 billion in fraudulent loans. The former executives seem to have added fake assets to the corporate portfolio in order to attract more investments. It worked. Banks in Germany and Japan as well as many corporate investors granted billions to the seemingly prospective payment processor.

 

 

Now the three suspects are staying in custody, and are being investigated for fraud, breach of trust, forging accounts, and market manipulation. The former Chief Operating Officer, Jan Marsalek, who was fired after the missing sum was revealed, apparently fled to Belarus and is presumably still there or in Russia.

 

 

About Wirecard

The infamous payment processor was founded in Munich, in 1999. After some troubles and mergers, in 2006 the startup acquired XCOM Bank AG which had a universal banking license and held material licenses for the issuing and acceptance of credit cards. This way, the renamed Wirecard Bank was licensed by Visa and Mastercard, meaning it could both issue credit cards and handle money on behalf of merchants.

 

In just a couple of years, Wirecard was accused of balance sheet irregularities for the first time. Since 2008, Wirecard had faced a lot of skepticism about how the company could generate the worldwide revenue it claimed. That was when EY’s relationship with Wirecard began. The company was hired to conduct a special audit amid allegations from the German shareholder association. It cleared Wirecard’s reputation.

 

From 2009, EY became Wirecard’s group auditor. Being a respected firm, it brought back the public trust towards the accused financial services provider. For many years, all allegations were denied by both the German company and its auditor. Moreover, the author of the accusing association’s “misleading” report was prosecuted and briefly jailed for non-disclosure of having minor ownership of Wirecard stock, from which he profited when the share price fell.

 

Meanwhile, Wirecard began its vast international expansion in 2010. It acquired large payments processors in Asia, India, and the USA over the next decade.

 

In 2016, the German banking company agreed to buy Citi Prepaid Card Services as part of a strategy to grow beyond Europe and become a global payments player. At the time, Wirecard was already the second-largest payments processor in Europe behind WorldPay. The company said the prepaid card business would be integrated with Wirecard’s global payments platform.

 

Due to the series of exposing articles by the Financial Times (FT), both the general public and local regulators started paying more scrupulous attention to the shady Wirecard activities. However, Wirecard denies everything, and BaFin, the German financial regulator, supports the company. According to the FT, journalists, researchers, hedge funds, and short-sellers critical of Wirecard have both been investigated by BaFin and received “spear-phishing” emails for years after their claims.

 

The payment processor became Europe’s largest fintech, raising huge investment sums and reaching the market cap of €24 billion. In 2018, Wirecard replaced

 

Commerzbank in the prestigious DAX 30 index, making it an automatic investment for pension funds around the world. Who would guess then that the sensational fintech unicorn would soon become the first listed member of the 30-year-old DAX to go bust?

 

In 2019, Wirecard and UnionPay partnered for their mutual benefit. The partnership meant to support UnionPay’s continuous push for international growth, while also fueling Wirecard’s presence in China. It was a major deal since UnionPay led the global card scheme market, having issued over half of the world’s payment cards currently in circulation. However, the excitement of the global strategic partnership soon faded away.

 

As journalists and investigators got hold of some internal documents and the reports from whistleblowers, the Wirecard soap bubble finally burst. In 2020, KPMG’s auditing report failed to verify the genuine nature of Wirecard profits reported from 2016 to 2018.

 

A few months later, even EY confirmed the obvious discrepancies in Wirecard’s financial results for 2019 and the first quarter of 2020. The auditor is still struggling to explain why it signed off on Wirecard’s books for years though.

 

Source:

https://payspacemagazine.com/fintech/wirecard-collapse-explained-current-situation/

NOTES/ GUIDELINES

Answer ALL questions

  1. Discuss the details of the Wirecard scandal.

700 word count (30 marks)

  1. Ernest and Young cleared Wirecard’s reputation back in 2008 and BaFin, the German financial regulator, continually supports Wirecard. Critics of Wirecard were investigated by BaFin.

Evaluate whether or not both these organization should be held accountable for the scandal. Provide justification for your response. 900 word counts

Example : using Kant’s ethics to justifiy

 

When talking about whether the two organizations, E&T and BaFin, should be held accountable for the wirecard scandal, I'm here to using Kantian ethics, to evaluate whether the behavior of one of the organizations should be responsible for the wirecard scandal.

 

Kant’s ethics pays attention to principles and believes that to judge whether people’s behavior is moral or not, it does not need to look at the result of the behavior, but only whether the behavior conforms to the moral rules, whether the motivation is kind, whether it is out of obligation, etc., and when the behavior is determined by a group of people or a group of people, after this culture is recognized, it is considered moral behaviour.

 

For Germans, Wirecare is more than just a company, because Germany has long relied on traditionally industries such as machinery, automobiles, and chemicals. To a certain extent, Wirecard is a symbol of Germany's ability to innovate and represents the development trend of alternating old and new. According to Kantian ethics, if BaFin launched an investigation on Wirecard at that time, it was not in line with the prevailing German culture at the time, that is indirectly acknowledging the authenticity of Wirecard's false accounting scandal was an immoral behavior.

 

By the way, BaFin have perfect duties adopted various policies to protect wirecard's behavior, which was in line with the prevailing culture at the time and was an ethical behavior without consider result. (40 marks)

  1. Suggest course of action (s) to prevent discrepancies in the financial results reporting to ensure that such scandal will not arise in the near future. (40 marks)

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

16.99 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions