Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting Department of Business Studies HELP Bachelor of Business (Hons) Year 3 INTERNAL SUBJECT DETAILS Semester 3, 2021 Subject: MGT 302 Change Management Introduction to the Teaching Staff Ravi Varmman is a senior lecturer with HELP University in the Business department
Faculty of Business, Economics and Accounting
Department of Business Studies
HELP Bachelor of Business (Hons) Year 3
INTERNAL SUBJECT DETAILS
Semester 3, 2021
Subject: MGT 302
Change Management
Introduction to the Teaching Staff
Ravi Varmman is a senior lecturer with HELP University in the Business department. He lectures in Strategic Marketing Management, New Product Management and International Marketing. He is one of the facilitators for the Charles Sturt University, MBA programme, lecturing on International Business, Marketing Management, Marketing and Organizational Research and Business and Professional Ethics.
PRE-REQUISITE(S)
MGT101 Principles of Management
SYNOPSIS.
This course introduces the concepts of change management and the skills needed to effectively trigger and lead effective changes across an organization.
Change is a permanent feature of modern organizational life. It is not only a manager’s ability to cope with change that is important but his/her ability to lead and manage change effectively is also vital.
Students will learn why organisation change occurs, how it occurs, how it can be managed, and what forms it can take, among other inquiries. The learning extends to the processes involved in managing and leading change, including the important task of carrying out diagnosis, and its contribution to the overall objective of achieving meaningful, timely and lasting change.
Upon successful completion of this subject, students should:
|
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2018). Organization development and change (11th ed.). Cengage Learning. |
|
|
Burnes, B. (2014). Managing change (6th ed.), Pearson.
In addition to books you should consult journals and newspapers. The following journals are suitable:
Academy of Management Review
Academy of Management Executive
Academy of Management Journal
Administrative Science Quarterly
Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resource Management
California Management Review
Group and Organisation Studies
Harvard Business Review
Human Relations
Human Resource Management
Journal of Management Studies
Journal of Organisational Change Management
Leadership and Organizational Development Journal
Organizational Dynamics
Organisational Studies
Sloan Management Review
Lecturer : Mr.Ravi Varmman K Subject Title : Change Management
WEEK |
LECTURE TOPIC |
Week 1 |
Overview:(i)The Nature of Planned Change, (ii)The Organizational (“OD”) Practitioner |
Week 2 |
(i)Entering & Contracting, (ii)Diagnosing, |
Week 3 |
(i)Collecting, Analyzing and Feeding Back Diagnostic Information, (ii)Designing Interventions |
Week 4 |
(i)Managing Change, (ii)Evaluating & Institutionalizing OD Interventions |
Week 5 |
Interpersonal, Group & Organization Process Approaches |
Week 6 |
(i)Restructuring Organizations, (ii)Employee Involvement |
Week7 |
(i)Work design, (ii)Performance Management |
Week 8 |
Mid Semester Break |
Week 9 |
(i)Talent Management, (ii)Workforce Diversity & Wellness |
Week 10 |
Transformational Change |
Week 11 |
Continuous Change/ Trans-organizational Change |
Week 12 |
(i)OD in Nonindustrial Settings. (ii)Future Directions in OD |
Week 13-14 |
Revision |
Week 15 |
Examination Period |
Week 16 |
Examination period |
Textbook:
Cummings, T. G., & Worley, C. G. (2018). Organization development and change (11th ed.). Cengage Learning.
ASSESSMENT
There are 3 assessment items for this subject.
Assessment Items |
Value |
Due Date |
1. Assignment 1 |
25% |
24 September 2021 |
2. Assignment 2 |
25% |
5 November 2021 |
3. Final Assessment - |
50% |
Start – Complete Period: 23 November to 26 November 2021 |
REQUIREMENTS
To gain a pass in this subject, students must:
EXTENSIONS AND PENALTIES FOR LATE SUBMISSION OF ASSIGNMENT(S) BUT NOT FINAL ASSESSMENT
If you are having difficulty in completing work in time due to illness or *extenuating circumstances, you may apply for an extension through your lecturer with supporting documentations eg. medical certificate, police report etc. Applications for extensions on or after the due date of the assessment will not be considered. A deduction of 10% per day from the marks awarded after the due date applies, if the piece of work is submitted late without approved extension.
*Extenuating circumstances should primarily mean, medical conditions (both physiological and psychological), family issues (death or illness), and personal misfortune (accident, mugging, theft). Student should provide document proof for all of the above and should also obtain prior approval from the examiner towards late submission.
Due date: |
24th September 2021 |
Value: |
20% + 5% |
Word limit: |
2500 - 3000 words |
Rationale
To provide students the ability to recognize, diagnose and appreciate “best practices” within the framework of organizational development and change management.
Task
WITH INDUSTRY 5.0, MAN AND MACHINE COLLABORATE TO FIND WAYS OF WORKING TOGETHER TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY, CHOICE AND SUSTAINABILITY
Industry 5.0 focuses on combining human creativity and craftsmanship with the speed, productivity and consistency of robots. The fourth industrial revolution, or Industry 4.0, saw the integration of smart, connected, and autonomous digital and physical technologies like IoT and robotics. Industry 5.0 integrates AI and the crucial and exclusively human strengths of problem-solving, value-adding creativity, and deep understanding of customers, to improve products and productivity and enable mass personalisation. The theme explores the transformative potential of Industry 5.0, bringing to bear technical, behavioural, business, and societal perspectives to address opportunities and challenges.
With the theme of, “Technology to enable human-machine collaboration”, carry out an investigation to explore the said relationship, its impact on human, challenges and potential avenue to synergize to make it a workable solution to fit the aspiration of Industry 5.0.
Based on the above article you are required to carry out a literature review on the perspective of remote work (aka work from home).
Your discussion should include:
Note:
Project 2
Due date: |
5 November, 2021 |
Value: |
25% of total assessment in subject |
Word limit: |
3000 – 3500 words
|
Rationale
Task:-
Hybrid work is a drastic departure from the traditional work model. Hybrid work has many variations. Some companies might allow every employee the flexibility to work on-site and remotely part of the week. Other companies might have employees working either full-time remote or full-time on-site. And others might allow a combo of the two.
You have been tasked to investigate the matter by focussing on a company of your choice and eventually to provide a solution for the said company to migrate into a hybrid work model. The company you select must firstly be a local company (Malaysian), and secondly must be within the category of Small & Medium Sized Enterprise (SME). The solution you provide must show a comprehensive plan as to how the said firm would proceed to adopt a hybrid work model and how it can transition towards it smoothly.
Refer to the guideline below to complete this project.
Note:
You may gather information from interviews, company websites or published literature of the said organization.
This is a group project. Each group should consist between 4 - 5 students only.
Upon submission of written report each member of the group should attach an individual log.
Prepare a written report of length between 3000 -3500 words.
All academic formalities as in assignment one must be strictly adhered to.
Period: |
23 November 2021 (9.00am) – 26 November 2021 (5.00pm) |
Value: |
50% |
Duration: |
Four (4) Days |
Instruction:
This assignment will be the third and final assessment set for this subject.
Candidates will be given a case incident.
Candidates will be given 4 days to complete this task.
Candidates will have to attempt this task by complying with all academic formalities as stipulated for a regular assignment as have been laid out for Assignment 1 and 2
Further details on the final assessment will be updated on the 11th week of the semester..
Note:
Candidates should take note that you will have to obtain a pass grade for this component in order to obtain an overall pass for this subject.
ASSIGNMENT ASSESSMENT RUBRICS
Note:
All 3 assessments will be graded using the below rubrics.
Marking Rubrics:
Category |
Criteria |
Ratings |
Marks |
|||||||
Outstanding |
Competent |
Below Average |
Unsatisfactory |
|||||||
Content |
Relevance to Question Asked |
Comprehensive exploration of the topic. (10-9 marks) |
Has covered reasonably well within the confines of the given literature for this course. (8-6marks) |
Topic not fully covered (5-3 marks) |
Totally off tangent from the topic. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
||||
Effective Use of Theory |
Has used more than three theories in discussion (5 marks) |
Has used at least two theory in discussion (4-3 marks) |
Has used at least one theory in discussion (2-1 marks) |
No theories were used. (0 marks) |
/5 |
|||||
Topics Discussed in Depth |
Critical comment and a personal synthesis of the issues shown. (10-9marks) |
Has attempted to be critical but does not show personal synthesis (8-6marks) |
Discussion is too brief (5-3 marks) |
No element of discussion, very narrative. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
|||||
Logically Developed Argument |
Discussion put forward has absolute consistency with flow of thought. (10-9 marks) |
Has attempted systematic exploration of the topic. (8-6 marks) |
A reasonably balanced summary of the issues as reflected in the course study materials. (5-3 marks) |
Unreflective personal comment, incoherent argument. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
|||||
Integration of Reference Material |
Detailed support from literature. (5 marks) |
Regular support provided from the literature. (4-3 marks) |
Some explanation, illustration and support is provided from the literature. (2-1 marks) |
No support from literature. (0 marks) |
/5 |
|||||
Variety of Viewpoints Expressed |
Demonstrated wide understanding of the topic with excellent reference made to contemporary thought on the investigated topic.
(10-9 marks) |
Demonstrated good understanding of the topic with some reference made to contemporary thought on the investigated topic. (8-6marks) |
Demonstrated fair understanding of the topic with no reference made to contemporary thought on the investigated topic. (5-3marks) |
Demonstrated poor understanding of the topic with no reference made to contemporary thought on the investigated topic. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
|||||
Originality |
Originality and Creative Thought |
Demonstrated strong element of independent thinking (10-9 marks) |
Attempted to show independent thinking but did not fully explore the thought. (8-6marks) |
Thoughts were developed based on known paradigm. (5-3 marks) |
Did not show any originality or creative thought in work. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
||||
Goes Beyond Basic Course Material |
Wide range of reference material used beyond suggested in the course material (10-9 marks) |
Course materials were used effectively, without reference made beyond that. (8-6 marks) |
Used course material reasonably well. (5-3 marks) |
Course material was poorly utilized. (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
|||||
Style and Presentation |
Language Fluency and Style |
Virtually flawless language proficiency (5 marks) |
Few flaws in grammar and spelling (4 marks) |
Minor flaws in grammar , spelling and clarity of sentences. (3 marks) |
Major flaws in grammar , spelling and clarity of sentences. (2-0 marks) |
/5 |
||||
Well Organized and Clear Framework |
Virtually flawless presentation, conforming to all expectations of format and structure. (5 marks) |
Few flaws in presentation. (4 marks) |
Opening paragraph simply restates the topic.
Some major points missed (3 marks) |
Structure confused, not discernible, not explained (2-0 marks) |
/5 |
|||||
Reasonable Length |
Below 3% range of word length (5 marks) |
Within 3% - 5% range of word length (4 marks) |
Between 5% - 7% range of word length (3 marks) |
More than 7% range of word length (2-0 marks) |
/5 |
|||||
Referencing |
Acknowledgement of Sources |
Flawless referencing method, conforming to expected academic formalities (5 marks) |
Few flaws in academic formalities (4 marks) |
Minor flaws in academic formalities (3marks) |
Major flaws in academic formalities (2-0 marks) |
/5 |
||||
Wide Range of Sources Used |
More than 20 sources used to complete the assessment, of which more 50% and more are journal articles. (10-9 marks) |
10 -19 sources used to complete the assignment of which 30% - 49% are journal articles (8-6 marks) |
5-9 sources used to complete the assignment of which 30% - 49% are journal articles (5-3 marks) |
Only used 4 or below sources to complete the assignment o only referred to 30% and below to journal articles (2-0 marks) |
/10 |
|||||
Total |
/100 |
|||||||||
Assignment No.: __
Assignment Cover Sheet
Student Information (For group assignment, please state names of all members) |
Grade/Marks |
|||
Name |
ID |
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
Module/Subject Information |
Office Acknowledgement |
|||
Module/Subject Code |
|
|
||
Module/Subject Name |
|
|
||
Lecturer/Tutor/Facilitator |
|
|
||
Due Date |
|
|
||
Assignment Title/Topic |
|
|
||
Intake (where applicable) |
|
|
||
Word Count |
|
Date/Time |
||
Declaration
. I/We have read and understood the Programme Handbook that explains on plagiarism, and I/we testify that, unless otherwise acknowledged, the work submitted herein is entirely my/our own.
. I/We declare that no part of this assignment has been written for me/us by any other person(s) except where such collaboration has been authorized by the lecturer concerned.
. I/We authorize the University to test any work submitted by me/us, using text comparison software, for instances of plagiarism. I/We understand this will involve the University or its contractors copying my/our work and storing it on a database to be used in future to test work submitted by others.
Note:1) The attachment of this statement on any electronically submitted assignments will be deemed to have the same authority as a signed statement.
2) The Group Leader signs the declaration on behalf of all members.
Signature: |
Date: |
|
mail: |
|
|
Feedback/Comments* |
||
Main Strengths |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Main Weaknesses |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
Suggestions for improvement |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
Student acknowledge feedback/comments |
|
|
||
Grader’s signature |
Student’s signature: |
|
Date: |
Date: |
|
Note:
1)A soft and hard copy of the assignment shall be submitted.
2)The signed copy of the assignment cover sheet shall be retained by the marker.
3)If the Turnitin report is required, students have to submit it with the assignment. However, departments may allow students up to THREE (3) working days after submission of the assignment to submit the Turnitin report. The assignment shall only be marked upon the submission of the Turnitin report.
*Use additional sheets if required.
|
ACADEMIC INTEGRITY
Honesty and Responsibility
Academic integrity is an important tenet for HELP University. In pursuit of the highest standards of academic integrity, the Department of Business Studies holds it students to the highest ethical standards defined by the Rules and Regulations section of the Academic Handbook. All students at the Department of Business Studies are subjected to and are bound by the Student Academic Misconduct Rule to assure academic honesty. Students are required to sign a pledge on the assignment cover sheet before submitting your assignments to the Administration Office of the Faculty of Business, Economics & Accounting.
What is Plagiarism?
Plagiarism is academic dishonesty or academic theft, and it is a serious academic offence. Plagiarism includes, but is not limited to, the followings:
While a student is not discouraged to discuss an assignment with his/her friends or classmates, the work he/she submits must be done by the student alone. If a student shares his/her assignment with other students and they plagiarize it, the student is as guilty as those students who plagiarized his/her assignment. All parties to plagiarism are considered equally guilty. Under no circumstances should a student be involved in collusion with other students unless he/she is permitted to work on an assignment jointly by the lecturer/tutor. If a student is unsure what constitutes plagiarism, he/she is obliged to consult the lecturer/tutor on the matter before submission of his/her assignment.
When and How to Reference?
Knowing when and how to cite is a student’s responsibility. If he/she is in doubt or need more help on this matter, the student may consult the lecturer/tutor. The following list comprises some of the sources a student will need to reference. The list is by no means exhaustive, but simply consists of the most common sources used by students to complete their work.
Students are advised to cite in the following cases [[1]]:
In general, a referencing system requires two parts:
This is information about a source within the text of an assignment.
This is a list of all sources a student has used to research his/her assignment. It is alphabetically arranged by author surname and appears immediately after the last page of an assignment.
Different faculties or departments may have different requirement on how referencing for an assignment should be done. The various formats used for in-text citations and list of references are available in the following websites:
Once a student has selected a referencing style for his/her assignment, he/she must follow the same style consistently throughout the assignment. We strongly suggest that the student consults the lecturer/tutor about which method to use before submission of his/her assignment.
What are the Procedures and Penalties for Plagiarism?
When a lecturer/tutor encounters a possible case of plagiarism, the lecturer/tutor shall report the matter to the Head of the Department, who then initiates an investigation on the matter. The following procedures would be carried out:
Possible penalties for plagiarism range from mark reduction for the assignment to expulsion from the University. The student will not be allowed to make up the assignment. If plagiarism has been found to have occurred, the Department will take action(s) as determined by the forms of plagiarism implicated:
Verbatim copying another person’s work without acknowledgement
1st offence |
: |
A grade of “F” in the subject and a warning letter will be issued |
2nd offence |
: |
Expulsion from the University at the discretion of the Head of Department |
Near-verbatim copying another person’s work by simply altering the order of the sentences or the format of presentation or by changing a few words or phrases without acknowledgement.
1st offence |
: |
Zero mark on the assignment and a warning letter will be issued |
2nd offence |
: |
A grade of “F” in the subject and a warning letter will be issued |
3rd offence |
: |
Expulsion from the University at the discretion of the Head of Department |
Acknowledgement is made but paraphrasing by changing and/or eliminating some words
1st offence |
: |
Deduction of 50% of available marks on the assignment and a warning letter will be issued |
2nd offence |
: |
A grade of “F” in the subject and a warning letter will be issued |
3rd offence |
: |
Expulsion from the University at the discretion of the Head of Department |
Insufficient acknowledgement by not applying citation or quotation marks correctly
1st offence |
: |
Deduction of up to 50% of available marks on the assignment and a warning letter will be issued |
2nd offence |
: |
A grade of “F” in the subject and a warning letter will be issued |
3rd offence |
: |
Expulsion from the University at the discretion of the Head of Department |
Pleading ignorance or unintentional plagiarism does not constitute valid reasons for plagiarism and will not avoid the penalties from being imposed. Excuses for acts of plagiarism such as the following, but not limited to, will not be entertained:
Students should be reminded that it is their responsibilities to take due care throughout their written work to effectively reference or cite when they use others’ ideas from any source.
[1] http://www.yale.edu/bass/writing/sources/plagiarism/warning.html, accessed May 18, 2008.