Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / PSY4005D Introduction to Research Methods 2 Question 1
PSY4005D
Introduction to Research Methods 2
Question 1. Use the details below of a hypothetical experiment to answer parts a to f.
This study is about the effects of reminders on people’s intentions. People often declare an intention to change their behaviour, such as eating healthier or going to the gym more often. However, these intentions often fall through. A group of researchers investigated whether people simply forget about their intentions, and whether providing cues to remind them to do something would make it more likely to happen.
Participants were randomly assigned into two groups. The first group (control group) did not receive any reminders. The second group (reminder through association group) were told that a picture of an elephant would appear on a survey, and when they saw the picture, they would need to select choice E on the last question despite it being the wrong answer. The control group were told to select choice E at the start of the experiment but were not provided a reminder. The results are presented in Table 1 below.
Hypothesis: People who were reminded through association would be more likely to select choice E on the last question than the control group who were not provided a reminder.
(33% of the marks) (LOs 1, 2, 3, 5) Table 1.
Number of participants who selected or did not select choice E when they were placed in a control or reminder group.
|
Did not select choice E |
Selected choice E |
Control |
63 |
90 |
Reminder through association |
20 |
132 |
Question 2. Use the details below of a hypothetical experiment to answer parts a to f.
A popular technique used in false memory research is the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm. Participants are presented with a list of words they must remember. They are then asked to recognise the words they remembered from a list. Within this list are non-presented but related words from the original list, known as critical lures. Participants often report some of these lures were present in the original list.
A group of researchers wanted to investigate whether warning participants about the presence of these lures would decrease the number of lures they recalled. Twenty-five participants completed two conditions where they were not warned about the lures and then when they were warned. The data are shown in Table 2 below.
Hypothesis: People will recall fewer lures when they are warned than when they are not warned.
(33% of the marks)
(LOs 1, 2, 3, 5)
Table 2.
Number of critical lures recalled under the warning and no warning conditions
Participant |
Warning |
No Warning |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
6 |
1 |
3 |
7 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
1 |
3 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
10 |
1 |
1 |
11 |
1 |
2 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
13 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
1 |
2 |
15 |
1 |
3 |
16 |
2 |
2 |
17 |
3 |
3 |
18 |
1 |
3 |
19 |
2 |
3 |
20 |
3 |
2 |
21 |
1 |
2 |
22 |
1 |
2 |
23 |
1 |
3 |
24 |
1 |
3 |
25 |
2 |
2 |
Question 3. Use the details below of a hypothetical study to answer parts a to f.
Participants were given a ‘traditional’ gender bias questionnaire which is a subjective measure of whether a person holds gender stereotypical views. They were also given an implicit association test, which is a reaction time test that, it is claimed, can measure gender bias objectively and hence is more difficult to fake. The experimenters wanted to know how these two measures are related. Both measures were converted to provide a score on a scale of 0 (least gender biased) to 100 (most gender biased). The data are shown in Table 3 below.
Hypothesis: Subjective measures of gender bias will be positively associated with objective measures of gender bias.
(34% of the marks)
(LOs 1, 2, 3, 5)
Table 3.
Measure of each participant’s subjective and objective measure of gender bias.
Participant |
Subjective |
Objective |
1 |
46 |
47 |
2 |
49 |
59 |
3 |
40 |
68 |
4 |
52 |
77 |
5 |
56 |
58 |
6 |
51 |
44 |
7 |
57 |
44 |
8 |
49 |
41 |
9 |
67 |
82 |
10 |
44 |
58 |
11 |
43 |
52 |
12 |
51 |
57 |
13 |
66 |
71 |
14 |
50 |
65 |
15 |
51 |
59 |
16 |
55 |
52 |
17 |
58 |
52 |
18 |
55 |
55 |
19 |
59 |
63 |
20 |
53 |
52 |
21 |
58 |
68 |
22 |
55 |
68 |
23 |
46 |
40 |
24 |
56 |
66 |
25 |
40 |
35 |
26 |
58 |
68 |
27 |
54 |
59 |
28 |
59 |
65 |
Guidelines
You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the APA system(s).
The My Study Skills Area on iLearn contains useful resources relating to referencing.
Additional notes:
Students are required to indicate the exact word count on the title page of the assessment.
The word count excludes the title page, tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. Where assessment questions have been reprinted from the assessment brief these will also be excluded from the word count. ALL other printed words ARE included in the word count See ‘Word Count Policy’ on the homepage of this module for more information.
Submission Guidance
Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail.
Your assessment should be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file. For more information please see the “Guide to Submitting an Assignment” document available on the module page on iLearn.
You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is on the homepage of your module and also in the Induction Area).
Assessment Criteria (Learning objectives covered - all)
Level 4 is the first stage on the student journey into undergraduate study. At Level 4 students will be developing their knowledge and understanding of the discipline and will be expected to demonstrate some of those skills and competences. Student are expected to express their ideas clearly and to structure and develop academic arguments in their work. Students will begin to apply the theory which underpins the subject and will start to explore how this relates to other areas of their learning and any ethical considerations as appropriate. Students will begin to develop self-awareness of their own academic and professional development. |
||
|
||
Grade |
Mark Bands |
Generic Assessment Criteria |
First (1) |
80%+ |
Outstanding performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject area and to confidently apply theory whilst showing awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows an excellent level of competence and confidence in managing appropriate sources and materials, initiative and excellent academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. |
70- 79% |
Excellent performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply theory whilst showing some awareness of any relevant ethical considerations. The work shows a high level of competence in managing sources and materials, initiative and very good academic writing skills and professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows originality of thought. |
|
Upper second (2:1) |
60- 69% |
Very good performance which demonstrates the ability to analyse the subject and apply some theory. The work shows a good level of competence in managing sources and materials and some initiative. Academic writing skills are good and expression remains accurate overall. Good professional skills (where appropriate). The work shows some original thought. |
Lower second (2:2) |
50- 59% |
A satisfactory to good performance which begins to analyse the subject and apply some underpinning theory. The work shows a sound level of competence in managing basic sources and materials. Academic writing skills are satisfactory and expression remains accurate overall although the piece may lack structure. Satisfactory professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks some original thought. |
Third (3) |
40- 49% |
Basic level of performance in which there are some omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows a basic use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are limited and there are some errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are some difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. |
Marginal fail |
30- 39% |
Limited performance in which there are omissions in understanding the subject, its underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows a limited use of sources and materials. Academic writing skills are weak and there are errors in expression and the work may lack structure overall. There are difficulties in developing professional skills (where appropriate). The work lacks original thought and is largely imitative. |
|
29% and below |
A poor performance in which there are substantial gaps in knowledge and understanding, underpinning theory and ethical considerations. The work shows little evidence in the use of appropriate sources and materials. Academic writing skills are very weak and there are numerous errors in expression. The work lacks structure overall. Professional skills (where appropriate) are not developed. The work is imitative. |
Already member? Sign In