Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / NATIONAL UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SPD 616 ASSIGNMENT 1
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL EDUCATION
SPD 616 ASSIGNMENT 1.2 SPECIAL EDUCATION LAW ANNOTATED TIME LINE
Directions
Law and legislation have played a significant role in the creation of and development of the field of special education. In special education knowledge of the historical events and legal aspects are essential for understanding current legal rights in special education. In this graphic organizer, you will identify and define several key legislation and case law cases that have shaped special education. As you complete the graphic organizer, please include in the Summary section how the legislation establishes or impacts IEPs, free and appropriate education (FAPE), least restrictive environment (LRE), appropriate evaluation, parent and teacher participation, procedural safeguards, confidentiality, transition services, and/or discipline. You will also define and identify the impact of various professional organizations.
The graphic organizer is to be completed individually or in small groups. Upon completion, the group or individual are to identify which laws they believe to be most influential to the field of special education. The data collected and the three laws selected as most influential will be shared in discussions.
Collaboration Guidelines: Collaboration is required and these guidelines must be followed
Resources needed to complete the assignment.
Complete the following in small groups of 3-4 people
|
YEAR |
LEGISLATION & CASE LAW |
SUMMARY |
HISTORICAL SIGNIFICANT & IMPLICATIONS FOR SP.ED. |
IMPLICATIONS FOR TEACHING & LEARNING |
|
|
Year passed |
Name of law or case law |
Does it establish or impact IEPs, free and appropriate education (FAPE),least restrictive environment (LRE), appropriate evaluation, parent and teacher participation, procedural safeguards, confidentiality, transition services, and/or discipline.? |
How this historically impacted field of special education |
The affects or implications for teaching and learning |
|
|
LEGISLATION |
|||||
|
1954 |
PL83-158 Coop Research Act |
First federal research program in special ed. Pre IDEA so no IEP, FAPE,LRE impact. |
Led to the Training for Professional Personnel Act which focused on professional preparation for educating children with mental retardation. Led to increased support for professional preparation to teach a wider range of disabilities |
Strong support for extensive and specific training to be a special education teacher |
|
|
1961 |
PL87-276 teachers of the Deaf Act |
|
|
|
|
|
1965 |
PL89-759 Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) |
|
|
|
|
|
1968 |
PL90-538 Handicapped Children’s ECE Assistance Act |
|
|
|
|
|
1973 |
Rehabilitation Act of 1973- section 504 |
|
|
|
|
|
1974 |
Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) |
|
|
|
|
|
1975 |
PL 94-142 Education For All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) became IDEA |
|
|
|
|
|
1984 |
Perkins Act |
|
|
|
|
|
1986 |
PL 98-199 Handicapped Children’s Protection Act (HCPA) |
|
|
|
|
|
1987 |
Civil Rights Restoration Act |
|
|
|
|
|
1990 |
PL 95-49 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) |
|
|
||
|
1990 |
American with Disabilities Act (ADA) |
|
|
|
|
|
1997 |
IDEA |
|
|
|
|
|
2002 |
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) |
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
IDEA |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
ADA Amendments |
|
|
|
|
|
CASE LAW |
|||||
|
1954 |
Brown vs Board of Ed, |
|
|
|
|
|
1972 |
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v. Pennsylvania |
|
|
|
|
|
1980 |
Mills v. Board of Education of the District of Columbia |
|
|
|
|
|
1982 |
Rowley v. Board of Education |
|
|
|
|
|
1983 |
Roncker v. Walter |
LRE
|
|
|
|
|
1985 |
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center |
|
|
|
|
|
1985 |
Burlington v. Mass |
|
|
|
|
|
1988 |
Honig v. Doe |
|
|
|
|
|
1989 |
Daniel R. R. v. State Board of Education |
LRE
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills SD |
|
|
|
|
|
1993 |
Doe v. Withers |
|
|
|
|
|
1994 |
Sacramento City Unified School District v. Rachel H. by Holland |
|
|
|
|
|
1999 |
Cedars Rapids CUSD v. Garrett F. |
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
Schaffer v. Weast |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
Winkelman v. Parma City SD |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
Bd of Education v. Tom F |
|
|
|
|
|
2017 |
|
|
|
||
|
SOME CALIFORNIA STATE LAW |
|||||
|
1996 |
|
|
|
||
|
2015 |
SB277 Vaccination Law |
|
|
|
|
|
2019 |
Kerri K, et al. vs. State of California, et al. |
AB-2657 Pupil discipline: restraint and seclusion |
|
|
|
|
2019 |
Change in ed Specialist requirement |
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR |
ORGANIZATION |
SUMMARY |
IMPLICATIONS FOR SP.ED. & FOR TEACHING & LEARNING |
||
|
1922 |
Council of Exceptional Children (CEC) |
|
|
||
|
1950 |
National Association for Retarded Citizens (NARC) |
|
|
||
|
|
National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|||
|
1989 |
International Association of Special Education (IASE) |
|
|
||
|
|
Center for the Study of Autism (CSA) |
|
|
||
|
|
DREDF |
|
|
||
|
|
Other: |
|
|
||
|
|
Other: |
|
|
||
Identify which legislation or case law you deem as most important in the field of special education and explain why
|
Case Law or Legislation |
Rationale |
|
1.
|
|
|
2.
|
|
|
3.
|
|
