Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Harvard University AUDIT 111 Chapter 5-Systems Development and Program Change Activities TRUE/FALSE 1)The objective of systems planning is to link systems projects to the strategic objectives of the firm
Harvard University
AUDIT 111
Chapter 5-Systems Development and Program Change Activities
TRUE/FALSE
1)The objective of systems planning is to link systems projects to the strategic objectives of the firm.
terms.
a. |
reconciling program version numbers |
b. |
program testing |
c. |
user involvement |
d. |
internal audit participation |
a. |
a cost-benefit analysis was conducted |
b. |
the detailed design was an appropriate solution to the user's problem |
c. |
tests were conducted at the individual module and total system levels prior to implementa- tion |
d. |
problems detected during the conversion period were corrected in the maintenance phase |
a. |
documentation updates |
b. |
testing |
c. |
formal authorization |
d. |
internal audit approval |
a. |
compiled programs are very susceptible to unauthorized modification |
b. |
the source program library stores application programs in source code form |
c. |
modifications are made to programs in machine code language |
d. |
the source program library management system increases operating efficiency |
a. |
using passwords to limit access to application programs |
b. |
assigning a test name to all programs undergoing maintenance |
c. |
combining access to the development and maintenance test libraries |
d. |
assigning version numbers to programs to record program modifications |
a. |
Database Management System |
b. |
Recovery Operations Function |
c. |
Source Program Library Management System |
d. |
Computer Services Function |
a. |
involves individual modules only, not the full system |
b. |
requires creation of meaningful test data |
c. |
need not be repeated once the system is implemented |
d. |
is primarily concerned with usability |
a. |
An audit objective for systems maintenance is to detect unauthorized access to application databases. |
b. |
An audit objective for systems maintenance is to ensure that applications are free from errors. |
c. |
An audit objective for systems maintenance is to verify that user requests for maintenance reconcile to program version numbers. |
d. |
An audit objective for systems maintenance is to ensure that the production libraries are protected from unauthorized access. |
a. |
protect applications from unauthorized changes |
b. |
ensure applications are free from error |
c. |
protect production libraries from unauthorized access |
d. |
ensure incompatible functions have been identified and segregated |
a. |
conceptual level |
b. |
context level |
c. |
intermediate level |
d. |
elementary level |
a. |
is a top-down approach |
b. |
is documented by data flow diagrams and structure diagrams |
c. |
assembles reusable modules rather than creating systems from scratch |
d. |
starts with an abstract description of the system and redefines it to produce a more detailed description of the system |
a. |
this approach does not require input from accountants and auditors |
b. |
development time is reduced |
c. |
a standard module once tested does not have to be retested until changes are made |
d. |
system maintenance activities are simplified |
tables?
a. |
context level |
b. |
elementary level |
c. |
intermediate level |
d. |
prototype level |
a. |
the internal auditor |
b. |
the project manager |
c. |
a user representative |
d. |
the system designer |
a. |
operational feasibility study |
b. |
schedule feasibility study |
c. |
legal feasibility study |
d. |
economic feasibility study |
a. |
hardware acquisition |
b. |
insurance |
c. |
site preparation |
d. |
programming |
a. |
software acquisition |
b. |
data conversion |
c. |
personnel costs |
d. |
systems design |
a. |
backbone system |
b. |
vendor-supported system |
c. |
benchmark system |
d. |
turnkey system |
a. |
can be installed faster than a custom system |
b. |
can be easily modified to the user’s exact specifications |
c. |
is significantly less expensive than a system developed in-house |
d. |
is less likely to have errors than an equivalent system developed in-house |
a. |
a detailed review of the source code |
b. |
contact with user groups |
c. |
preparation of a request for proposal |
d. |
comparison of the results of a benchmark problem |
a. |
fully documented system report |
b. |
systems selection report |
c. |
detailed system design report |
d. |
systems analysis report |
a. |
input screen formats |
b. |
alternative conceptual designs |
c. |
report layouts |
d. |
process logic |
a. |
systems designers and programmers |
b. |
end users |
c. |
accountants |
d. |
all of the above require systems documentation |
a. |
structure diagrams |
b. |
overview diagram |
c. |
system flowchart |
d. |
program flowchart |
a. |
run schedule |
b. |
logic flowchart |
c. |
file requirements |
d. |
explanation of error messages |
except
a. |
a list of users who receive output |
b. |
a program code listing |
c. |
a list of all master files used in the system |
d. |
a list of required hardware devices |
a. |
decomposing the system |
b. |
validating the database |
c. |
reconciliation of new and old databases |
d. |
backing up the original files |
a. |
cold turkey cutover |
b. |
phased cutover |
c. |
parallel operation cutover |
d. |
data coupling cutover |
a. |
crane used to install equipment |
b. |
freight charges |
c. |
supplies |
d. |
reinforcement of the building floor |
a. |
software acquisition costs |
b. |
systems design costs |
c. |
data conversion costs |
d. |
programming costs |
a. |
a recurring cost |
b. |
a data conversion cost |
c. |
a systems design cost |
d. |
a programming cost |
a. |
increased customer satisfaction |
b. |
more current information |
c. |
reduced inventories |
d. |
faster response to competitor actions |
a. |
expansion into other markets |
b. |
reduction in supplies and overhead |
c. |
more efficient operations |
d. |
reduced equipment maintenance |
a. |
can be measured and expressed in financial terms |
b. |
might increase revenues |
c. |
might decrease costs |
d. |
all of the above |
a. |
are easily measured |
b. |
are of relatively little importance in making information system decisions |
c. |
are sometimes estimated using customer satisfaction surveys |
d. |
when measured, do not lend themselves to manipulation |
a. |
opinion surveys |
b. |
simulation models |
c. |
professional judgment |
d. |
review of accounting transaction data |
a. |
the report of systems analysis |
b. |
the systems selection report |
c. |
the detailed system design |
d. |
the systems plan |
a. |
site preparation |
b. |
insurance |
c. |
programming and testing |
d. |
data conversion |
a. |
results in a formal project schedule |
b. |
does not include a review of the current system |
c. |
identifies user needs and specifies system requirements |
d. |
is performed by the internal auditor |
a. |
it constrains the generation of ideas about the new system |
b. |
it highlights elements of the current system that are worth preserving |
c. |
it pinpoints the causes of the current problems |
d. |
all of the above are advantages of surveying the current system |
a. |
gathering facts |
b. |
surveying the current system |
c. |
redesigning bottleneck activities |
d. |
reviewing key documents |
a. |
identify user needs |
b. |
specify requirements for the new system |
c. |
formally state the goals and objectives of the system |
d. |
specify the system processing methods |
a. |
the conceptual design of the new system |
b. |
an evaluation of the new system |
c. |
users’ needs and requirements for the new system |
d. |
a comparison of alternative implementation procedures for the new system |
a. |
specify audit trail requirements |
b. |
prepare data gathering questionnaires |
c. |
suggest inclusion of advanced audit features |
d. |
ensure mandated procedures are part of the design |
a. |
designing the system outputs |
b. |
resolving conflicts that arise from a new system |
c. |
selecting the programming techniques to be used |
d. |
approving the accounting procedures to be implemented |
a. |
specifying system objectives |
b. |
preparing a formal project proposal |
c. |
selecting hardware vendors |
d. |
producing a project schedule |
a. |
technical feasibility |
b. |
economic feasibility |
c. |
logistic feasibility |
d. |
schedule feasibility |
47. Which of the following is not a tool of systems analysts?
a. |
observation |
b. |
task participation |
c. |
audit reports |
d. |
personal interviews |
a. |
all similarities and differences between competing systems are highlighted |
b. |
structure diagrams are commonly used |
c. |
the format for input screens and source documents is decided |
d. |
inputs, processes, and outputs that distinguish one alternative from another are identified |
a. |
the accountant is responsible for designing the physical system |
b. |
the accountant is responsible to ensure that audit trails are preserved |
c. |
the internal auditor is responsible to confirm that embedded audit modules are included in the conceptual design |
d. |
the accountant is responsible to make sure that the accounting conventions that apply to the module are considered by the system designers |
a. |
data conversion |
b. |
software maintenance |
c. |
insurance |
d. |
supplies |
a. |
provides authorization control for the Systems Development Life Cycle |
b. |
will eliminate any crisis component in systems development |
c. |
provides a static goal to be attained within a five-year period |
d. |
all of the above |
a. |
technical feasibility |
b. |
conceptual feasibility |
c. |
operational feasibility |
d. |
schedule feasibility |
.
project.
.
firm.
Systems Authorization Activities: All systems should be properly authorized to ensure their economic justification and feasibility. This requires a formal environment in which users submit requests to systems professionals in written form.
initial programming and testing system design-one
hardware costs
software maintenance costs site preparation
rent for facilities
data conversion from old system to new system insurance costs
installation of original equipment hardware upgrades
Already member? Sign In