Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Assignment #3: Implementation and Evaluation Plan You will formulate and communicate a feasible implementation plan and offer a careful evaluation plan for your community health program

Assignment #3: Implementation and Evaluation Plan You will formulate and communicate a feasible implementation plan and offer a careful evaluation plan for your community health program

Health Science

Assignment #3: Implementation and Evaluation Plan

You will formulate and communicate a feasible implementation plan and offer a careful evaluation plan for your community health program. Your implementation and evaluation plan should be based on your change and program theories.

The purpose of this assignment is to demonstrate your ability to justify the approach you intend to take to your program and its likelihood of achieving a positive health effect.  

Instructions: 

Format?:    Papers should be 3-5 pages long, double-spaced, 12-font and 1” margins all around. APA format should be followed throughout, including all cited references.  References are not included in the 5-page limit, and should include all data sources. Quality of writing and APA is worth 5pts.

 

Contents:  ?Please follow the below outline as a guide.   

 

Program theory Logic Model (5pts) 

Construct a visual conceptual model of your program with assumptions, inputs, activities, and outputs that are clearly related to your intended program goals/outcomes. Provide a written annotation to explain and justify its contents. 

 

Timeline, budget, and budget justification (5pts)

Provide a high-level 24-month timeline that represents your work plan. Create a budget outlining the resources needed to complete your program activities. Budgets should adhere to the parameters outlined in the RFP, so please review carefully.  Write a budget justification explaining the purpose of each expense and how you calculated the estimated cost. Identify risks to your suggested budget and describe how these risks will be managed. Include evaluation costs in your budget. ?The timeline and budget worksheet do not count toward the  3-5 page limit and can be attached as an appendix to the paper. Templates for timeline and budget will be provided. 

 

Process Evaluation Plan  (5pts)

Describe how you will evaluate the process of implementing your program. Identify specific process measures from your program plan and describe how you will evaluate those measures (method, how often). Make sure you include assessments of whether your target population is being reached, whether the program is implemented as planned, and how you will remedy under-performance of your program plan. 

 

Effects Evaluation Plan (5pts)

Describe how you will evaluate the effectiveness of your health program. Identify specific health outcome measures as well as intermediate behavioral or environmental change outcomes of interest. Describe how you will evaluate those measures (method, how often) and how you will evaluate upstream influences on these outcomes. Make sure to include an assessment of whether you can or can’t evaluate long-term impact (like reduced mortality). 

 

Peer Review (5pts): ?Provide a formal peer review of one classmate’s needs assessment using a  template provided by the instructor. I will assign you a peer to swap with and the template. 

 

DUE DATE?:   Papers should be uploaded via Engage by ?11:59 pm on Sunday of Week 6?. Peer   Reviews due ?11:59 pm on Wednesday of Week 7.  

 

Grading

criteria

Excellent

Competent  

Developing

Weak

Logic

Model and

Objectives

5pts 

A clear and concise logic model that clearly identifies all components of the program theory/work plan

(4.5-5)

A sufficient logic model is provided identifying program components,

needs improvement for

clarity (4)

A logic model is offered but is lacking in clarity in some way  (3.5)

An insufficient or no logic model is provided (0.5-3)

Timeline and Budget

5pts 

Budget is thorough and reasonable, within RFP parameters, and clearly accounts for all activities. (4.5-5)

Budget is reasonable and within RFP parameters but needs some improvement to be complete (4)

Budget is lacking in specificity and unclear as to whether it accounts for

all necessary program activities (3.5) 

Budget is unclear or insufficient, falls out of RFP parameters, or is missing too many components (0.5-3)

Process evaluation

5pts

Measures are specific, measurable, and directly tied to the program theory. The process evaluation plan is complete and thoroughly considered.

(4.5-5)

Measures are reasonably tied to the program theory. The process evaluation plan is solid but needs some improvements to be fully complete. (4)

Measures are proposed but do not clearly track with the program theory or need revision in order to be informative (3.5)

The process evaluation plan is insufficient for the purpose, or the measures chosen are not relevant according to the program theory. (0.5-3)

Effects evaluation

5pts

Measures are specific, measurable, and directly tied to the change theory. The effects evaluation plan is complete and thoroughly considered. (4.5-5)

Measures are reasonably tied to the change theory. The effects evaluation plan is solid but needs some improvements to be

fully complete. (4)

Measures are proposed but do not clearly track with the change theory or need revision in order to be informative (3.5)

The effects evaluation plan is insufficient for the purpose, or the measures chosen are not relevant according to the change theory. (0.5-3)

Academic writing quality and

APA

5pts 

Excellent academic writing quality. Concise scholarly tone, well organized, uses appropriate vocabulary and standard English. Clear, logical, and coherent flow.

Strong skill, proper APA.

(4.5-5)

Good writing quality. Professional tone, well organized and rarely strays from appropriate vocabulary or standard English. Clear and logical flow. (4)

Acceptable writing quality. Communicates ideas, but lacks professional or academic tone.

Organization, clarity, and flow need improvement. Strays from standard English and/or writing quality interferes with comprehension. (3.5)

Inadequate writing quality. Inappropriately casual, not organized clearly or lacks clarity..

Strays from standard English. The writing quality is in the way of understanding the argument. (0.5-3)

Peer Review

5pts

 High quality, specific, and critical feedback offered that addresses all areas of the paper (4.5-5)

Sufficient feedback offered that addresses the paper but may focus more on positive than constructive critique (4)

Incomplete or inactionable feedback provided, or feedback does not indicate comprehension of the paper (3.5)

Peer review is inadequate or missing entirely (0.5-3)

Total points earned (out of 30)

 

Late adjustment (-10% or 3pts  for each day late unless other arrangements were made) 

 

Final grade

 

A: 90-100% (27-30 points) / B: 80-89% (24-26 points) / C: 70-79% (21-23 points) / BC below 70% (20.5 points or below)

 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

14.99 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

rated 5 stars

Purchased 3 times

Completion Status 100%

Sitejabber (5.0)

BBC (5.0)

Trustpilot (4.8)

Google (5.0)