Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / There are serious public and environmental health concerns with meat supply chains, such as antibiotic resistance, methane production, and animal welfare (See readings in Mod 4

There are serious public and environmental health concerns with meat supply chains, such as antibiotic resistance, methane production, and animal welfare (See readings in Mod 4

Management

There are serious public and environmental health concerns with meat supply chains, such as antibiotic resistance, methane production, and animal welfare (See readings in Mod 4.2, and the textbook's case study of Country Natural Beef & Table 3.4).

Identify one major animal supply chain change that has happened (past) or will happen (future) in one form of meat production and discuss:

  1. What prompted the change?
  2. What are the outcomes of the change (intended and unintended)?
  3. What are the impacts of the change on producers and consumers?

Guidelines

A complete and meaningful response to the discussion prompt will earn the required points. You may instead choose to respond to another student's original response to the prompt, which will also count as points if it is complete and meaningful, for example, raises additional support for an argument, respectfully challenges a position, or raises meaningful questions.

In each Discussion forum, if you both respond to the original prompt and engage in a dialog with a classmate in an exchange of more than 2 posts (your original post or a classmate's), you can earn an additional one point in that forum, gaining an additional point on the Discussion.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Identify one major animal supply chain change that has happened (past) or will happen (future) in one form of meat production and discuss:

The reduction of antibiotic use for growth promotion and disease prevention.

  • What prompted the change?
    • The problem of antibiotic resistance in humans has increased over the past few decades.  Along with the over-use of antibiotics within the human medial field they have also been overused in our food supply chain.  Having them in our food supply increases the chances of resistance in humans.
  • What are the outcomes of the change (intended and unintended)?
    • As described in The Washington Post’s editorial “A great first step to protect antibiotics for the future”, the Obama administration proposed that manufacturers stop selling antibiotics for growth promotion.  Additionally, they recommended veterinary oversight be strengthened in the industry.  Data from the FDA shows a 33 percent decline between 2016 and 2017 in domestic sales and distribution, and a drop of 43 percent from 2015.   
    • This has caused the price of production to increase. As these antibiotics were once used for disease prevention and       growth promotion, farmers now can expect to see more sick animals and smaller healthier animals.
  • What are the impacts of the change on producers and consumers?
    • Overall there has been a positive impact to consumers. They can expect food to be antibiotic free, which means reducing their chances of having a resistant bacterial infection.  The consumer will likely pay more but as the market grows for this type of food the supply should become plentiful and prices should drop.
    • Producers now have to deal with more sick animals and likely less yields. This has a cost associated with it, one where they will have to absorb or pass on to the consumer.  However, they have taken a step towards responsible farming and consumers are now taking that into consideration when purchasing food at the grocery store.

Related Questions