Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / 1) Discuss the premises of the classical theory of crime and what you agree/disagree with and why

1) Discuss the premises of the classical theory of crime and what you agree/disagree with and why

Sociology

1) Discuss the premises of the classical theory of crime and what you agree/disagree with and why.

2) Discuss the premises of the neoclassical theory of crime and what you agree/disagree with and why.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

According to classical theory in criminal justice, it implies that an individual who breaks the law does so with sound free will, with knowledge of the effects of their actions. As a response to a criminal's action, the classical theory of crime proposes that society should enforce a punishment that fits the crime committed. Neoclassical theories of crime maintain that preventing, decreasing, or eradicating crime can occur through stricter child-rearing practices, enhanced punishments, and/or an increase in surveillance and security (Bohm & Vogel, 2001).

Step-by-step explanation

The conventional belief of criminology indicated criminals induce crime for the sake of pleasure and pain. Hence, they have a human tendency to commit a crime. Classical philosophers support means of prevention to deter future crimes and reject capital punishment and the death penalty as punishment (Adelman, et al. 2017). The purpose of classical philosophy is to create predetermined beliefs for the benefit of society. This is also whereby classical criminology believes criminals exhibit impulsive behavior that leads to peril in society.

I disagree with this theorem since it doesn't put into consideration the socioeconomic impact of crimes. People make a decision based on grounds, but the reason is more complex when an individual commits a crime. Modern criminology describes crime as an individual making impulsive decisions without considering consequences.

 

Neoclassical criminology focused on individual rights, due process, alternative sentencing, and legal rights.  Neoclassical devotees relied on scientific proof, the reason for the crime, and consequences. In any case, the people have no free will when they commit crimes. So, neoclassical theory suggests crimes need a due process of the law (Schmalleger, 1999). Many of the modern period's rights have an origin from neoclassical thinking like liberty, search, and seizure, imprisonment, trials, sentencing, self-incrimination, and interpreters are part of the criminal system today.
I disagree with this theorem since it tries to reduce or ignore other factors, like chronological oppression, intercepted chances, and deprivation. This theory, therefore, puts the guilt for committing crimes exclusively on the individuals, rather than on environmental factors. While crime is a result of people making a calculated choice to maximize pleasure while avoiding the pain of punishment, neoclassical theorists fail to suppose that everyone will decide to commit a crime.