Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / CHIC 141A (90376 - online) The report is to be 5-7 pages in length
CHIC 141A (90376 - online)
The report is to be 5-7 pages in length. Please be sure to use both a title page and works cited page. (title and works cited pages do not count toward the overall page count of your review) You are also encouraged to follow the MLA or Chicago formats to develop this report. Please double-space your review. This review will count as 20% toward your final grade. And in your works cited page, please list the name of the article that you will be summarizing and analyzing. This an example of the type of the format you should follow:
“Urbanism and Early State Formation in the Huamelulpan Valley of Southern Mexico,’ by
Andrew K. Balkansky. Latin American
Antiquity, Vol. 9, No. 1 (March 1998), pp. 37-67.
In terms of the content of the report, | am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should
devote the first half of the report toasummary of
In terms of the content of the report, | am looking for two main points of discussion. First, you should
devote the first half of the report to asummary of the main points that the author is trying to
convey to the reader. To help you to address this issue, consider some of these questions: What type
of article is this? ls the author presenting an original feature, or is he/she conducting a book review? If
this is a book review, what book (or books) is being reviewed? What is the author’s purpose for writing
this article? What is the author’s academic or professional background?
As for the second point of discussion, this is where
you provide your opinion or perceptions of the article. In other words, what did you think about
it? What were the strengths or weaknesses of the article? How did the article relate to the class? You
are definitely encouraged to write in first person
singular (I feel that..., | think..) as you provide your opinions. As a general rule of thumb, your JSTOR review should be about 60% summary and 40% commentary. Thus a 5-page review with about 3 &
1/2 pages summary and 1 & 1/2 pages commentary is an ideal proportion.
