Part 1

The management of Fraser Lake Sawmills has appealed to the Labour Relations Board. The main reasons for this are that the arbitrator made several errors in his decision. The union did not negotiate in good faith and deliberately tried to frustrate the process, they argue.

Part 2

The management of Fraser Lake Sawmills made the following closing argument. The main reasons for this are as follows:. The arbitrator made several errors in his calculations and his decision is not supported by the evidence. Workers are not entitled to the same benefits as employees at other sawmills in the area.

Part 3

The case of Smith v. Jones & Sons Ltd. provides a good example of how the labour relations board should rule in the Fraser Lake Sawmills case. The board found that the workers were not entitled to the same benefits as employees at other sawmills in the area.

Step-by-step explanation

Part 1

• Based on the Fraser Lake Sawmills case which was an appeal to the Labour Relations Board of an earlier arbitration decision, the management of Fraser Lake Sawmills would like to submit the following closing argument. The labour relations board should overturn the earlier arbitration decision and find in favor of Fraser Lake Sawmills.

Part 2

• Based on the Fraser Lake Sawmills case which was an appeal to the Labour Relations Board of an earlier arbitration decision, the management of Fraser Lake Sawmills would like to submit the following closing argument. The labour relations board should overturn the earlier arbitration decision and find in favor of Fraser Lake Sawmills. 
• The main reasons for this are as follows: 1. The arbitrator made several errors in his calculations and his decision is not supported by the evidence. 2. The union did not negotiate in good faith and deliberately tried to frustrate the process. 3. The workers are not entitled to the same benefits as employees at other sawmills in the area. We believe that the board will come to the same conclusion that the earlier arbitration decision was flawed and should be overturned. The workers at Fraser Lake Sawmills are not entitled to the same benefits as employees at other sawmills in the area, and the union did not negotiate in good faith. We thank the board for its time and consideration.

Part 3

• The case of Smith v. Jones & Sons Ltd. provides a good example of how the labour relations board should rule in the Fraser Lake Sawmills case. In Smith v. Jones & Sons Ltd., the board found that the workers were not entitled to the same benefits as employees at other sawmills in the area. 
• The union did not negotiate in good faith, and the arbitrator made several errors in his calculations. We believe that the board will come to the same conclusion in the Fraser Lake Sawmills case.