Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / CSA 1 In preparation for Case Study Analysis 1, please refer to the instructions found in the Case Study Analysis Instructions module before you begin the assignment
CSA 1
In preparation for Case Study Analysis 1, please refer to the instructions found in the Case Study
Analysis Instructions module before you begin the assignment. The case study assignment is titled:
Isolation of a Global Giant (Kinicki & Breaux Soignet, 2022) and is located on pages 174-175. Please
Construct your case study analysis based on the following two discussion question:
1. What is the underlying problem in this case from the perspective of Huawei's CEO?
2. How can Huawei expand outside of China despite the obstacles it faces?
Case Study Analysis Instructions
Throughout the next eight weeks, we will work on the case method regularly. Case studies are stories that often illustrate realistic and complex situations involving one or more protagonists. Typically, they focus on problems or events that involve conflict, negotiation, or dilemmas. In business and management
Classes, cases help Students Bridge the gap between theory and practice. Working with cases allows you to practice identifying the parameters of a problem, recognizing and articulating a position(s), evaluating solutions and courses of action, and arguing or defending different viewpoints.
The case analysis process starts with critically reading the case and taking notes of numbers and ideas you might want to quote later. After that, you proceed to identify the problems in the case and their underlying issues. Brainstorming potential options is an essential part of the analysis as it will allow you to determine the best option to achieve the desired outcome. To draft your case analysis, make sure to use the DAE framework:
Rubric for CSA
Course: MGMT 500 Sec 02 10955 Bus Policies Operations Organ
|
Define the problem of issue |
Excellent |
Good |
Insufficient |
No Credit |
Criterion Score |
|
Define the problem of issue |
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors. |
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement with adequate level of detail, including evidence of most relevant contextual Factors. |
The problem statement is superficial with limited evidence of some of the most relevant contextual factors.
|
No work was Completed or it was mostly incoherent.
|
/15 |
|
Analysis |
Excellent 40 points |
Good 32 points |
Insufficient 28 points |
No Credit 0 points |
Criterion Score |
|
Analysis using international business (IB) and/or management theories/ concepts/ frameworks
|
Analysis is organized, insightful evidence reveals the causes to the problem. Properly and effectively uses IB and/or management framework(s) throughout paper with no error. |
The analysis is organized and evidence effective in revealing the causes of the problem. Adequately and sufficiently uses IB and/or management framework(s) with minimal error.
|
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing the causes of the problem. Minimally uses theory, or uses it imprecisely in paper.
|
No work was completed or it was mostly incoherent.
|
/40 |
|
Discussion/ Evaluate Solutions |
Excellent 35 points
|
Good 28 points |
Insufficient 24.5 points
|
No Credit 0 points
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Discussion/ Evaluate Solutions |
The discussion is deep, contains a thorough and insightful explanation, and includes all of the following: considers history of problem, reviews reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
The discussion contains adequate explanation, and includes at least three of the following: considers history of problem, reviews reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
The discussion is brief and lacks depth, and includes at least two of the following: considers history of problem, reviews logic/reasoning, examines feasibility of solution, and weighs impacts of solution. |
No work was completed or it was mostly incoherent.
|
/35 |
|
Grammar/ Syntax |
Excellent 5 points |
Good 4 points |
Insufficient 3.5 points |
No Credit 0 points |
Criterion Score |
|
Grammar/ Syntax |
Rules of grammar are used correctly. Capital letters, punctuation, subject-verb agreement, spelling, and other syntactical elements are all done following conventional rules. |
Rules of grammar were not entirely maintained. Any one of the following was incorrectly applied: capital letters punctuation, subject-verb agreement, spelling, and other syntactical elements. |
Rules of grammar were not entirely maintained. Any two of the following was incorrectly applied: capital letters punctuation, subject-verb agreement, spelling, and other syntactical elements. |
No work was completed or it was mostly incoherent.
|
/5 |
|
Format/ Citations/ References |
Excellent 5 points
|
Good 4 points
|
Insufficient 3.5 points
|
No Credit 0 points
|
Criterion Score
|
|
Format/ Citations/ References
|
The assignment did not exceed 6 pages, font 11, Arial, double-spaced, one-inch margins, and proper citation and reference format.
|
Instructions were followed except for at least one of the following: did not exceed 6 pages, font 11, Adal, double-spaced, one-inch margins, and proper citation and reference format.
|
Instructions were followed except for at least two of the following: did not exceed 6 pages, font 11, Adal, double-spaced, one-inch margins, and proper citation and reference format.
|
No work was completed or it was mostly incoherent.
|
/5 |
Already member? Sign In
