Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / BE282 LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN PLANING AND CONTROL COURSEWORK – Spring, 2022 The coursework will be assessed by an Individual Report (2000 words – 100% of final marks)
BE282 LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN PLANING AND CONTROL
COURSEWORK – Spring, 2022
The coursework will be assessed by an Individual Report (2000 words – 100% of final marks).
For this individual essay, students will investigate a focal firm in a supply chain that is of interest. The organisation of interest can be located in any position in the network but is required to have a central role in the operation of the supply chain network. Typical examples would be original equipment manufacturers, large retailers or brand owners, or key part / raw material suppliers critical for networks at a broader scale, i.e. industry level.
The main objectives of the project are to identify and map the supply chain or network of the focal organisation; investigate and critically evaluate the supply chain management strategy and practices relevant to business functions entangled with supply chain management; identify risks, challenges and opportunities for the focal firm in the supply chain context; and develop supply chain management policy recommendations for the focal firm.
Individual essay is required to cover the key findings on the following areas
Discuss the supply chain planning and management processes, systems, and techniques, considering the relations between them. In particular, discuss o Demand Management and Forecasting[1]
Discuss weaknesses and strengths of the supply chain from a risk
management perspective and describe and critique risk management policies used.
Please keep in mind that you might not be able to find sufficient information about and elaborate on all of the specific items that are listed above. This list is provided as a guide on the key areas about which you should carry out research and for each area what key aspects you are expected to discuss. Your coursework will not be assessed by how many of these aspects have been covered. The assessment will instead concern a) the width of research (whether you have been able to cover the information that is available in the extant literature and public domain), b) the depth of understanding (ability to synthesize and reflect on pieces of information collected), c) the ability to identify challenges and opportunities for the focal organisation, and d) the relevance and applicability of recommendations provided. There will most likely be some pieces of information that you cannot find. Please see the notes below on
Sources of Information
The information required will be collected by group members by researching academic and practitioner literature. A good project will achieve a balance among different sources of information, including published case studies (check http://www.thecasecentre.org), primary company information (from company websites, reports, white papers, and interviews with company managers), industry reports, business surveys, and academic publications (see Module Outline for journals related to the subject). You must reference all the sources used to retrieve information. If private sources of information, such as private company data or interviews with company managers are used, relation information must be documented and supplied to the Module Leader, with consent from the relevant business contact.
Essex Business School uses the following marking scheme for non-quantitative assessments. These grades will be used to mark non-quantitative coursework and student work within EBS. These grades form a 20 point scale running from 95 to 0. These descriptors aim to give a general indication of the expectations of student performance for different degree classifications. Information regarding progression across a degree programme can be found on the following page.
Grade |
Degree Classification |
Indicative criteria for assessment of student work with nonquantitative components |
|
|
UG |
PGT |
|
95 |
First Class (1) |
Distinction |
A First Class (or Distinction) level answer is an excellent answer which demonstrates a systematic understanding of detailed, relevant knowledge. These pieces of work will display many of the following features: Structure
|
90 |
|||
85 |
|||
80 |
|||
75 |
|||
72 |
|||
68 |
Upper Second Class (2.1) |
Merit |
This is a very good answer, which demonstrates a good level of knowledge. These pieces of work will display several of the following features: Structure
Coverage
Analysis
|
65 |
|||
62 |
Grade |
Degree Classification |
Criteria |
|
|
UG |
PGT |
|
58 |
Lower Second Class (2.2) |
Pass |
This is a good answer which competently completes the task. It generally reproduces taught material but may display little evidence of independent reading. A 2:2 answer will display several of the following features: Structure
Coverage
Analysis
|
55 |
|||
52 |
|||
48 |
Third Class (3) |
Fail |
This is a weak answer which demonstates some knowledge, but it tends to be superficial, incomplete or poorly understood. A third class answer will display several of the following features: Structure
Coverage
Analysis
|
45 |
|||
42 |
|||
36 |
Fail |
This is a poor answer. A fail answer will display several of the following features: Structure
|
|
30 |
|||
24 |
|||
Grade |
Degree Classificati |
on |
Criteria |
12 |
|
|
Analysis
|
0 |
|
|
|
|