Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / When we think about discrimination we are used to see it being done to a minority group

When we think about discrimination we are used to see it being done to a minority group

Sociology

When we think about discrimination we are used to see it being done to a minority group. YEt for some reason there is this idea that the majority can not be discriminated against. So the question I have for you is this: 1. why do you think that people act and behave in a manner that the majority can't be discriminated against? 2. Why do you think that Christianity can be jeered without repercussions in our society? 3. Do you think that teasing, lambasting, or jeering a majority in this country is acceptable because that it is seen as a way of undermining the power or authority of the majority? 4. Why is it a bad idea for the majority to be traded disrespectfully and what negative consequences can come from it? 5. how have you see examples of this issue within the news or the media? Use the below posted article to answer these questions…… Exposed: Christian Students Rejected, Failed, and Expelled for their Faith by State Colleges and Universities By Matthew Clark5 yrs. ago Public colleges and universities are taking the gloves off when it comes to Christian students on their campuses. Gone are the days of surreptitious slights against Christians; now it is open season on faith. Blatant, in-your-face anti-Christian discrimination is the new norm. Christian students now face their applications being rejected because they let it slip out that they are a person of faith, receiving failing grades for daring to allow their religious beliefs to outweigh the omniscience of the educational elites, or being outright expelled for having the audacity to live in accordance with their faith. The rise of anti-Christian discrimination on public university campuses is astounding in its breadth and shocking in its shamelessness. The American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) is currently representing two students who were denied admission to the Radiation Therapy Program at the Community College of Baltimore County (CCBC): Brandon Jenkins and Dustin Buxton. These students, who were acting out their Christian faith by seeking to serve the hurting and the sick, were brazenly refused admission because of their professed belief in God. One student, Brandon, was denied admission because when asked in an admissions interview what was the most important thing in his life, he replied simply, “My God.” In rejecting his application, Radiation Therapy Program Director Dr. Dougherty informed Brandon, “I understand that religion is a major part of your life. . . however, this field is not the place for religion. . . . If you interview in the future, you may want to leave your thoughts and beliefs out of the interview process.” The college unapologetically doubled down on this sentiment, stating that Dr. Dougherty’s statement “is not bad advice,” and that students, when interviewing for secular positions, would be better advised to “have a concrete reason for wanting to undertake the training at hand than to say only that God directed one to do it.” (For more on Brandon’s case, click here). This situation is almost unbelievable, but unfortunately Brandon isn’t alone. Dustin was similarly denied admission to CCBC’s Radiation Therapy Program because when asked about the guiding principle in his life during his interview process, he answered simply, “My faith.” Dr. Dougherty scored the Christian student’s interview low because “He [Dustin] also brought up religion a great deal during the interview.” When we notified the college of its discriminatory conduct, rather than apologizing for their clearly discriminatory decision, CCBC instead retaliated by placing an eightyfive year hold on Dustin’s account, forbidding him from registering for any classes. (For more on Dustin’s case, click here). We’re in federal court in both of these cases. This college’s anti-Christian discrimination is not only unconscionable, it’s unconstitutional. However, this college is far from alone in its attack on Christian students. Sadly, we are seeing a rise of instances across the country in which students at public universities and colleges are being unjustly discriminated against because of their professed Christian faith. Audrey Jarvis, a student at Sonoma State University in California, was asked by a university administrator to remove her cross necklace during orientation because it could potentially offend others. In Florida, at Polk State College, a professor gave a student zeros on several assignments because the student refused to agree with the professor’s anti-Christian bias. The course syllabus even stated, “[t]he point of this is not to ‘bash’ any religion, we should NEVER favor one over another, they all come from the same source, HUMAN IMAGINATION….” At Florida Atlantic University, a student was reportedly ordered to write the name of “Jesus” on a piece of paper and stomp on it. A student at Eastern Michigan University was expelled for expressing her faith in a counseling program. Likewise, a student at the University of Wisconsin was informed by her professor that “[r]eligious contemplations and the bible [sic] belong to a different realm and not academic sources. So your argumentation along Christian lines . . . are [sic] inappropriate for this presentation. I will not allow you to present unless you change this. You will also fail your presentation if your [sic] discuss religion in connection with it.” Additionally, Christian organizations are being removed from public university campuses. California State universities have effectively evicted Christian organizations from university campuses by refusing to recognize Christian organizations in college directories and university websites, increasing their room rental fees, and forbidding them from representing themselves at campus-wide open houses, until the Christian organizations accept California State University’s “allcomers” policy. In light of the prevalent rise of hostility towards religion by public universities and colleges, and the unapologetic discrimination against those professing Christian beliefs, we at the ACLJ are addressing the problem, and we are working towards gaining greater protections for religious liberties. The ACLJ has launched a new public advocacy campaign, joined by tens of thousands of Americans. Along with our representation of students like Brandon and Dustin in court, we’re sending a message to state colleges and universities across America: stop anti-Christian discrimination now. These lawsuits demonstrate to public universities and colleges that discrimination against students because of their profession of Christian beliefs is unacceptable – the American public will not support such blatant, unconstitutional discrimination against, and suppression of, religious freedoms. In short, we won’t tolerate it. https://aclj.org/religious-liberty/exposed-christian-students-rejected-failed-andexpelled-for-their-faith-by-state-colleges-and-universities
 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Religious Discrimination - Outline

  1. Why people act in a way majority cannot be discriminated against
  1. First of all, I think that people believe that social institutions such as courts and police have been strengthened to protect the affairs of majority groups.
  2. Secondly, individuals who are subject to discrimination believe that there are laws and policies which have been approved to protect the rights of the majority groups.
  3. Third, individuals considers that minority group’s culture is more superior to the minority groups.
  1. Why Christianity can be jeered without repercussions
  1. I ponder that Christianity can be jeered without repercussions given that Jesus has been forgiving our sins.
  2. Besides, God does not want anything blocking individuals from living in life in all its fullness.
  3. Thirdly, some individuals who jeer Christianity repent. In this way, they can connect with God effectively.
  4. Furthermore, God sent Jesus as the solution to the entire problems Christianity faces.
  1. Why jeering is not acceptable
  1. I think that teasing, lambasting, or jeering the majority is not acceptable since it hardly exposes them to the jobs they qualify to occupy.
  2. Second, it enables the involved parties to incur financial losses inform of legal battles.
  3. In addition, it increases hostility between the majority and minority groups.
  1. Why it is bad to trade majority disrespectfully and its consequences
  1. It is a bad idea for the majority to be treated disrespectfully given that it is against the Constitution and the privileges they ought to enjoy.
  2. As a result of disrespect, people are denied admission to different institutions.
  3. Besides, it enables people to be expelled from specific programs.
  4. Finally, it enables Christian organizations to be removed from universities.
  1. How have seen examples of the issue in media
  1. I have observed many media platforms displaying lawsuits demonstrating how majority groups have been discriminated against in society.
  2. I have also observed many media platforms reveal to society members the market forces that lead to discriminatory practices.
  3. Finally, I have observed them exemplifying media bias.

Religious Discrimination  

1. Why do you think that people act and behave in a manner that the majority can’t be discriminated against?

First of all, I think that people believe that social institutions such as courts and police have been strengthened to protect the affairs of majority groups. Secondly, individuals who are subject to discrimination believe that there are laws and policies which have been approved to protect the rights of the majority groups. Third, individuals considers that minority group’s culture is more superior to the minority groups. In this way, they argue that the minority groups normally remain silent even if they are exposed to racism. Besides, the existence of racial attitudes that favor the majority groups has made many individuals perceive that they can hardly be discriminated against.

2. Why do you think that Christianity can be jeered without repercussions in our society?

I ponder that Christianity can be jeered without repercussions given that Jesus has been forgiving our sins. In Mathew chapter 18 verses 21, this aspect is evident when Jesus answered Peter that he should not forgive seven times. Instead, he should learn to forgive people who wrong him seventy-seven times. Likewise, humanity has been forgiven the same times whenever they sin. Besides, God does not want anything blocking individuals from living in life in all its fullness. Thirdly, some individuals who jeer Christianity repent. In this way, they can connect with God effectively. Furthermore, God sent Jesus as the solution to the entire problems Christianity faces. In this way, he restores peace by reconciling the conflicts humanity is exposed to. Finally, laws in the Constitution protect people from repercussions.

3. Do you think that teasing, lambasting, or jeering a majority in this country is acceptable because that it is seen as a way of undermining the power or authority of the majority?

I think that teasing, lambasting, or jeering a majority is not acceptable due to profound reasons. Firstly, I ponder that it hardly exposes them to the jobs they qualify to occupy. Second, it enables the involved parties to incur financial losses inform of legal battles. Dustin Buxton and Brandon Jenkins represent few individuals who have incurred extra financial costs when being represented by the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) (Mathew, 2016). In addition, it increases hostility between the majority and minority groups. As a consequence, they can opt to fight so that they can solve their indifferences. Finally, I ponder it is not acceptable since God's commandments instruct humanity to refrain from committing such acts. In this way, they can be able to enter God’s kingdom and have everlasting life.

4. Why is it a bad idea for the majority to be traded disrespectfully and what negative consequences can come from it?

It is a bad idea for the majority to be treated disrespectfully given that it is against the Constitution and the privileges they ought to enjoy. As a result of disrespect, people are denied admission to different institutions. For instance, people interviewing Dustin decline to admit him to CCBC Radiation Therapy as a result of this aspect. Besides, it enables people to be expelled from specific programs. In specific, the article reveals that learners have been expelled at Eastern Michigan University as a result of expressing their faith in counseling programs (Mathew, 2016). In addition, disrespect enables the majority to score lower grades. Finally, it enables Christian organizations to be removed from universities. In this way, many learners feel threatened to embrace Christianity and follow its ideologies.

5. How have you see examples of this issue within the news or the media?

I have observed many media platforms displaying lawsuits demonstrating how majority groups have been discriminated against in society. Besides, I have seen them embracing the idea that some specific ethnic communities are more superior in society, thus they should be issued more privileges. I have also observed many media platforms reveal to society members the market forces that lead to discriminatory practices. In this context, they have revealed that social institutions such as universities and colleges are the key areas embracing this aspect. Finally, I have observed them exemplifying media bias. That is, they have been writing specific articles with tones displaying the presence of religious discrimination in society.      

Related Questions