Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Find one JOURNAL ARTICLE from a peer reviewed journal no more than 5 years old on a topic of your interest related to child welfare
Find one JOURNAL ARTICLE from a peer reviewed journal no more than 5 years old on a topic of your interest related to child welfare. This should be a 1-2 page typed review following APA format. My advice would be pick one topic (e.g. child sexual abuse, single parent families, ad infinitum) and do each of your assigned article reviews on that topic, but that is not a mandate. Read the article carefully three times. Then write a summary of the article that is between 400-450 words. Submit via Canvas. Tell what the purpose of the article was, the conclusions of the researchers, and any relevant information you think would be useful to the reader of your summary (ME). If you have any criticism (positive or negative) include that. Most importantly, describe thoroughly what you LEARNED. In addition the reviews will be evaluated based on:
After locating a peer reviewed journal article reporting a research study, answer the following questions.
Article Review on Child Sexual Abuse
Summary
Child Sexual Abuse (CSA) has been widespread, although various scholars have defined the term differently. According to Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef (2019), there has been substantial adverse behavioral, health, and social impact of CSA. Evidence of the prevalence and etiology of CSA has grown significantly since the 1970s. To date, there is a general agreement that CSA is a complex issue occurring for various reasons, in many ways, and different relations in peer groups, families, institutions, and communities. In 2019, Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef looked at the initiators and blocks to CSA disclosures. They argued that appropriate access to therapeutic and supportive measures for survivors of CSA could alleviate danger to the physical and mental well-being of people of different ages. Therefore, recognizing and indulging factors that inhibit or promote CSA disclosures can assist past disclosures, help survivors get timely services, and possibly inhibit more sexual oppression. A better understanding of the factors and the practices of disclosures of CSA are appropriate when researchers continuously show increased rates of delayed disclosures.
In their review, Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef (2019) focused on disclosures of CSA among different ages. The researchers used Kiteley and Stogdon's review model. They identified and analyzed 33 studies done after 2000 to induce the most substantial results to be deliberated for practice and more investigations. Their main research question aimed to determine the condition of CSA disclosure examination and what is applied to practice and research. In their study, they used Braun and Clarke's procedures for thematic examination, in which different themes appeared. First, they found that disclosure is an interactive, iterative course rather than a separate incident that is best performed in a social context. Secondly, modern disclosure frameworks replicate a person-in-environment and social-ecological orientation to understand the problematic interaction of persons, contextual, familial, and cultural factors considered in the disclosure.
Further, gender and age and considerably influence disclosure. Moreover, a life-course perspective is lacking. Finally, the barriers to disclosure continuously outweigh the facilitators. Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef (2019) concluded that many people are subjected to CSA, notwithstanding precautionary measures. Many victims continuously agonize silently, as shown by the increased amounts of late disclosure. Even though there have been firm strides made to understand disclosures of CSA, the available facts do not entirely arrest a unified image of processes of disclosure and paths throughout life. The researchers recommended a need for additional research on contextual, environmental, and cultural factors. Obstacles remain to be recognized more often than initiators, even though dialogical settings are developing as significant initiators of disclosure of CSA.
Questions
What type of research is used in the article?
Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef (2019) used mixed methods to perform their study. They performed a literature review of reliable sources published between 2000 and 2016. Further, they used Kiteley and Stogdon's systematic analysis model to perform investigations of disclosure investigations, through several mixed methods, to acme the most substantial conclusions that need consideration for additional research and planning. The word systematic implies a meticulously practical research approach of literature on research for the construction of knowledge. The researchers retrieved relevant research by searching global electronic databases. Also, the research used Braun and Clarke's procedures for thematic examination.
What was the research question or hypothesis?
The main research question was: What research exists about CSA disclosure, and what can be understood and applied to practice and further research?
What results were found?
After examining 33 peer-reviewed journals published between 2000 and 2016, these researchers identified five themes about CSA disclosure. To start with, disclosure is well-considered an interactive, iterative process than a specific incident performed in a relational setting. Secondly, modern frameworks reveal a person-in-environment and social-ecological model to know the complicated interaction of contextual, familial, individual, and cultural factors tortuous in disclosure of CSA. Thirdly, gender and age are essential disclosure factors. In addition, a life-course perspective is lacking. Lastly, disclosure barriers continue to offset the facilitators (Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef, 2019).
What are the implications of the results for human services? That is, what kinds of services or policies should agencies provide, based on this article?
There are solid strides made in using a social-ecological model to reinforce studies in the investigations about the disclosure. Therefore, there should be continuous research efforts and considerations of practice. Also, CSA disclosures can happen in a dialogical setting, such as helpful formal relations and other relations such as trusted adults and peers. Therefore, education and information on sexuality matters, and sexual abuse, can assist people in disclosing. Further, objectives of therapeutically reinforced disclosures may take precedence over legal methods if the health of victims is important. Therefore legal procedures may support disclosures and act as barriers because of the undesirable results of the court process. In addition, health care should understand the literature evidence about disclosure of CSA to create an environment to facilitate therapeutic disclosures. Finally, more research is required to identify trends over different stages in life (Alaggia, Collin-Vézina, and Lateef, 2019).
What is your opinion of this article? E.g. does it support or contradicts your beliefs, what you learned in the text etc.?
Based on the above themes, I consider disclosure a process, which is stressed throughout modern research. There are developments in the understanding of such complex processes. However, how the initial CSA detection or efforts to disclose in children affect future disclosures is poorly understood. I consider this to result from the lack of a unified life-course viewpoint on examinations, even though age constantly shells as considerably prompting disclosure. I recommend the use of a life-course angle in future longitudinal examinations.