Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / NU560 Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review Instructions This is part 2 of your evidence-based practice project

NU560 Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review Instructions This is part 2 of your evidence-based practice project

Nursing

NU560 Unit 4 Assignment Literature Review

Instructions

This is part 2 of your evidence-based practice project. 

In this assignment, you will refer back to the topic you selected for your evidence-based practice problem from the identified list of topics provided by your course faculty in week 1 and the three articles selected from your week 2 assignment.

For this assignment, you will interpret the three articles selected from your week 2 assignment. First, you must complete a matrix table for your three articles (see template provided below).  Once you complete this matrix table, you will write a paper, including the following information:

  • An introduction to the topic from week 2 and created PICOT question (although this information may be similar to what you provided in your week 2 assignment, be sure to paraphrase and not copy/paste directly from that assignment).
  • For each of the three articles selected, describe the following:
    • Concepts explored in the article/study (This is the “what” of the study.)
    • Methods used in the article/study (Describe this in detail; it’s “how” of the study.)
    • Participants in the article/study (This is the “who” of the study.)
    • Instruments/tools in the student (This is the resources used to collect the data; i.e.; survey, interview, etc. Be sure to include a discussion of reliability and validity, as well.)
  • Conclusion/summary of the evidence.
  • Be sure to provide the matrix table at the end of your paper as an appendix; failure to include this at the end of the paper or at all will result in point deduction.

Remember to support your ideas with the articles you found. These articles should be less than five (5) years old. They should not be from the Web, but from the library databases, and be sure to use a narrative format.

In addition, you must follow APA guidelines, providing a title page, reference page, appendix, and in-text citations, as well as use level headings to match the assignment criteria listed above.

Please use, at minimum three scholarly references, and your paper should be 4-5 pages, excluding title and reference pages and the matrix table.

Please review the rubric to ensure that your assignment meets criteria.

Attached File

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Rubric

NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric

NU 560 -Lit Review Rubric

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction

NU560-CO1; PRICE-P

25 pts

Above Expectations

Exquisitely states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

21.25 pts

Meets Expectations

Moderately states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

18.75 pts

Below Expectations

Minimally states purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

11.25 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not state purpose of paper, introduces contents of paper and captures reader’s attention.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Content

NU560-CO1; NU560-CO3; NU560-CO5; NU560-CO6; PRICE-P; PRICE-I

25 pts

Above Expectations

Conveys full understanding of the topic by fully addressing: The matrix table & selects appropriate sources of evidence to support EBPG/Translational research problem and composes a literature review supporting EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding the investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to the EBPG/Translational research proposal.

22.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Conveys understanding of the topic by addressing: The matrix table & selects appropriate sources of evidence to support EBPG/Translational research problem and composes a literature review supporting EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding the investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to the EBPG/Translational research proposal.

20 pts

Below Expectations

Conveys minimal understanding of the topic: The matrix table & selects appropriate sources of evidence to support EBPG/Translational research problem and composes a literature review supporting EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding the investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to the EBPG/Translational research proposal.

17.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not address: The matrix table or select appropriate sources of evidence to support EBPG/Translational research problem and composes a literature review supporting EBPG/Translational research proposal. Include a discussion regarding the investigation and search for the literature to gain knowledge related to the EBPG/Translational research proposal.

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeBody/Organization

NU560-CO6; PRICE-I

25 pts

Above Expectations

• Organized throughout • Logical, clear sequence • Exhibits critical thinking • 4-5 pages (not including title page and reference page)

22.5 pts

Meets Expectations

• Well organized • Easy to follow • Shows some original thought • 3-4 pages (not including title page and reference page)

20 pts

Below Expectations

• Some organizational. problems • Shows little original thought • Less than 3pages (not including title page and reference page)

17.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

• Difficult to follow • May jump topics • Shows little original thought • Less than 2 pages (not including title page and reference page)

25 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDevelops paper/References

NU560-CO1; PRICE-P

15 pts

Above Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 3 references used.

10.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 2 references used.

9 pts

Meets Expectations

Draws content from current & appropriate body of literature. At least 1 references used

7.5 pts

Below Expectations

No references.

15 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

PRICE-P; PRICE-I

5 pts

Above Expectations

Uses appropriate headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses correct APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references. No errors.

4.5 pts

Meets Expectations

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion or does not follow APA guidelines for headings. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with 1-5 minor errors noted.

4 pts

Below Expectations

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Uses APA format for title page, spacing, margins, headings, and references with more than 5 errors noted.

3.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

Does not use headings to clearly organize & delineate areas of discussion. Does not adhere to APA guidelines.

5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Spelling

PRICE-I; PRICE-P

5 pts

Above Expectations

No errors noted.

4.5 pts

Meets Expectations

1-2 grammar and/or spelling errors.

4 pts

Below Expectations

3-4 grammar and/or spelling errors.

3.5 pts

Expectations not addressed

More than 5 grammar and/or spelling errors.

5 pts

Total Points: 100

 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

16.99 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions