In a speech to motivate action, why should the audience be provided with information to take action immediately?

 In communication, speech is significant in delivering the intended message. Speeches that motivate the audience to take action need to be very persuasive and convincing (Thompson, 2018). In such as speech, it is vital to provide information that is needed to take action immediately. There are several reasons for providing the information to take action. The main reason for providing the information is to persuade the audience on the importance of taking action and ensuring they do not forget or procrastinate. Secondly, providing information helps to provide credibility on the need to take action. It gives the audience a sense of direction on where they are and where they are heading. It helps to convince of the need to take action.

When would a statement of reasons pattern be effective?

In a speech, a statement of reason is always very essential in promoting effective communication. The statement of reasons pattern is particularly effective on various occasions. The first occasion in when reporting on a research that was conducted. In reporting. It is crucial to justify the reason for conducting the study. Secondly, a statement of reasons is essential when persuading the audience to take a particular course of action. When influencing the audience, it is crucial to convince the audience about taking a specific action and disregarding the other. In communication, the audience is always eager to be convinced of the importance of taking a particular course through evidence. For example, when convincing the audience of the importance of social media to student lives. The parents must be eager to understand how social media will help their children improve.

When would a comparative-advantages pattern be effective?

In communication, a comparative advantage pattern is essential in convincing the audience of the message being delivered. The comparative advantage pattern would be effective when convincing the audience to take certain actions against another action. For example, in the speech to convince the audience on the importance of legalizing marijuana. The audience would be keen to understand how the benefits of legalizing marijuana are better compared with criminalizing its usage in society. The other circumstance that a comparative advantage pattern would be effective is comparing two products and convincing the audience why using one is better than the other (Mohan, 2019). For example, persuading people that Toyota is a better brand compared to Nissan. The audience will need to understand each brand's pros and cons and understand the advantage of one brand compared to the other.

In the notes this week, a list of fallacies should not be used in speeches. Provide an expanded definition and examples for each of the terms listed.

In a speech, persuasion is an essential part of effective communication. However, the use of fallacies might distract effective persuasion. There are various fallacies that speakers need to avoid. The first fallacy to avoid is red herring. Red herring involves diversion from the main issue through relating an issue with common fear (Rudanko, 2021). For example, persuading the audience on the social media use and then warning them that it encourages terrorism. The diversion affects the understanding of the audience on the issue. The second fallacy that should be avoided is a strawman. Strawman involves giving a weak argument that can easily be refuted (Rudanko, 2021). For example, convincing people that marijuana should be legalized because it provides employment. The other fallacy is begging the question by claiming the truth as if it is obvious. Speech on obvious issues might lead to loss of interest and concentration from the audience.