Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Chapter: Multiple-Criteria Methods for Evaluation and Group Decision Making 1) What experiences have you had with group decision-making? What difficulties do you see arising when trying to perform a multiple-criteria analysis with many interested parties involved? How might these difficulties be overcome, or at least mitigated? 2) In conducting a group study using a multiple-criteria method, you reach a point at which two of the participants cannot agree on a particular response
Chapter: Multiple-Criteria Methods for Evaluation and Group Decision Making
1) What experiences have you had with group decision-making? What difficulties do you see arising when trying to perform a multiple-criteria analysis with many interested parties involved? How might these difficulties be overcome, or at least mitigated?
2) In conducting a group study using a multiple-criteria method, you reach a point at which two of the participants cannot agree on a particular response. What course of action would you take to placate the parties and avoid further delay?
Multiple-Criteria Methods for Evaluation and Group Decision Making
What experiences have you had with group decision-making? What difficulties do you see arising when trying to perform a multiple-criteria analysis with many interested parties involved? How might these difficulties be overcome, or at least mitigated?
Group decision making is a participatory process whereby multiple individuals analyze problems, evaluate alternative courses of action and then select the best alternative solution collectively (Barnett, 2011). I have had several experiences with group decision making, and all were good since we discussed and came up with a successful solution. We first brainstormed ideas where each group member suggested alternative courses of action.
The group members were more creative by brainstorming ideas as everyone contributed a potential solution that could lead to a more effective decision. We had a good group leader who could control the group while discussing the best alternative solution. We evaluated the different suggestions, and we were able to come up with a solution that we collectively agreed was the best solution to implement. Therefore, I would recommend group decision-making over individual decision-making because a group generates many alternatives that may lead to a superior solution.
Multiple-criteria analysis is a method used to identify and compare different score adaptations options by assessing their effects, performance, impacts and trade-offs. It provides a systematic approach for ranking adaptation options against a various range of decision criteria. Some difficulties may arise when trying to perform this analysis with many interested parties. It may consume and take a long time, be challenging to compare case studies, be challenging to give consistent scores and risks of false subjectivity can be high ("Multi-criteria analysis (MCA)," 2021).
These difficulties that may arise when performing multiple-criteria analysis with many interested parties can be overcome—the use of software where necessary can overcome the problem with prolonged time consumption. The difficulty in comparing case studies can be mitigated by ensuring consistency and logical soundness. Ensuring consistency of the data requirements will also help overcome inconsistency when giving scores. Lastly, the challenge of false subjectivity can be overcome by ensuring an open and transparent analysis ("Multi-criteria analysis: a manual," 2009). In conclusion, even though multiple-criteria analysis has some difficulties, it is relatively simple and can be done at a relatively low cost in a short period of time compared to other methods of analysis.
In conducting a group study using a multiple-criteria method, you reach a point at which two of the participants cannot agree on a particular response. What course of action would you take to placate the parties and avoid further delay?
If two of the participants cannot agree on a particular response, the course of action I will take is to engage them in a win-win negotiation to appease them and avoid further delay. A win-win negotiation is a careful exploration that helps to find a solution that works for both parties. The first step is to separate the parties from the disagreement by ignoring their personality differences and focusing on the issue at hand. I will then focus on the interests of both parties and try to come up with options that will satisfy and placate both parties (Mindtools, 2020).
I will use objective criteria to set out facts about the response by showing evidence to support why the group had chosen the particular response during the study. Using facts and giving evidence to support the response will help the parties understand and reach an agreement. In the process, you should use the best alternative to negotiate into an agreement to ensure you achieve the desired result of bringing the parties into an understanding (Mindtools, 2020).
Title: Multiple-Criteria Methods for Evaluation and Group Decision Making Outline
Group decision making is a participatory process whereby multiple individuals analyze problems, evaluate alternative courses of action and then select the best alternative solution collectively.
