help in homework

New User?

Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Some elements to look for when using DOCS model Design: Features related to the way the text is laid out on the page

Some elements to look for when using DOCS model Design: Features related to the way the text is laid out on the page

Writing

Some elements to look for when using DOCS model Design: Features related to the way the text is laid out on the page. These are physical characteristics of the writing’s format, such as: ? Headings ? Highlighting particular phrases by using techniques such as bold, underline, or italics ? Use of images, charts, or graphs ? Spacing of the text ? Use of color ? Different sized fonts ? Different types of font ? Bullet points Organization: Features related to how the writer chooses to organize the information in the text. Writers generally use more than one method of organization. This can be about the text as a whole or a particular section of the text. Some common organization techniques are: ? Problem-solution ? General – particular ? Matching-contrast ? Topic-restriction-illustration ? Description ? Narrative ? Instruction ? Explanation ? Definition ? Exemplification ? Classification ? Compare-contrast ? Cause-effect ? Discussion-argumentation Content: Text content is not always obvious. Think about what information the author has decided to include in the text and how it relates to the topic, purpose, and audience. Examples include: ? Topics and relevant details. What types of information are included in the text? o Specific Disciplinary knowledge. This is generally knowledge gained through study or work in a particular field. o Insider knowledge. This is generally knowledge that is shared by a relatively small number of people and that is not known by others. o Participants: who is quoted/paraphrased? Whose points of views are expressed in the text? If the text is about a controversial issue, are both sides addressed? Style: Features relating to the language the author uses in the writing. These should be things that stand out. ? Vocabulary ? Specific grammar features, such as passive voice ? Verb choice ? Modals ? Sentence structure ? Jargon ? Figurative language, such as metaphor and simile Values: Often the most difficult to identify. Think about what is important to both the reader and writer. This needs to be specific and can fall under general categories that may overlap: ? Shared understanding of language (general): o Is the author using a specifc type of vocabulary (ex. Slang, jargon) to reach his audience. Based on this, what is important to the reader and writer? ? Shared life experience (general) o What experiences relating to the topic have both the reader and writer had? ? Shared cultural values (general) o These are values that stem from the reader and writer coming from the same or similar cultures. These are often related to religion or societal issues ? Shared disciplinary values (general) o These are values that are shared because the reader and writer have a background in the same discipline. What things are important to people from the discipline that are evident in the text? From Johns, A. Text, Role and Context Rough Draft Due: Sep. 15 Final Draft Due: Sep. 22 Ling 305W Project 1 – Genre Analysis using DOCS-V Write your genre analysis in paragraph format identifying genre conventions, providing examples of the features from both texts and explaining them. This should take 2-4 pages and should contain what you believe are the crucial conventions of Design, Organization, Content and Style of the genre you are covering as well as supported answers for (C) and (D). a. Begin with the rhetorical information of both texts: title, author’s name, date, source, genre, target audience, purpose of the texts/genre. b. List all four elements of the DOCS model separately; identify 2-3 features for each element, include quoted and/or paraphrased text, and explain how these features connect to the text’s effectiveness or ineffectiveness. c. Based on your analysis, describe what you believe certain discourse community values of the genre are when you consider the shared elements that arose from your DOCS analysis of the texts. d. What is your evaluation of the texts? Do both writers accomplish the purposes of the genre? Is one text more or less effective than another text? Explain your ideas. e. List the reference information, using APA or MLA format. (Helpful Questions to guide parts of Analysis) Rhetorical Information/Genre knowledge: ? What do you know about the genre? Who typically reads this genre? What is the context of this text? Who will read this specific text? ? Who is the writer? What do you know about the writer’s background, credibility, knowledge of the topic, beliefs, and social allegiances? ? What is the call to write? Why is the writer addressing the issue and taking a position at this particular time? Is there some sense of urgency involved? How does the writer identify the significance of the issues involved? ? Who is the intended audience? Is the writer addressing one group of readers or more than one? What kind of relationship is he/she trying to establish with readers? What assumptions about readers does he/she seem to make? D-O-C-S (See handouts from class, notes from class, examples and pg. 46 in your textbook) Discourse Community Values: ? What academic, professional, cultural, or religious values might be shared by the community? Text Effectiveness: ? What is your evaluation of the effectiveness of this text? Does the author accomplish his/her purpose? What are things that keep the text from being effective? Rough Draft Due: Sep. 15 Final Draft Due: Sep. 22 FINAL DRAFT: Order for submitting Project #1: ? Rough Draft Due Sep. 15 by 4pm ? Peer Review (in class and through Canvas-due Sep. 17 ? Final Draft Due: ____Sep. 22 by midnight (on Canvas, through Turnitin) Genre Analysis Grading Rubric: DESIGN: (15 points) 1. Proper format is used and the content fits the length specifications (2-3 full pages). 2. Title, subheadings, bullet points, and brief content are included. 3. A minimum of 2 conventions per section are emphasized by using bolded, italicized, or underlined text. 4. Optional images can enhance the handout. _____points Organization: (25 points) 1. The sequence follows the order outlined in #3 a-d from the prompt. 2. Each section (subheading and bullet points) focuses on one topic only and is developed with details, descriptions, and explanations. _______points Content: (25 points) 1. The purpose of the assignment is presented. The topic and issue is identified. 2. Texts are introduced including title, author’s name, date, source, genre, target audience. 3. The genre is explained/described in terms of DOCS based on the text examples. 4. An analysis is provided which discusses the elements of the text in terms of audience and purpose. 5. The texts are thoughtfully evaluated in terms of genre conventions, identification of community values and effectiveness in influencing audience to their purpose. 6. Quotation and paraphrase are included in the analysis. 7. Reference/work cited information is included. 8. Peer review sheet, peer-reviewed draft, annotated texts and notes are attached to DOCS-V analysis. Rough Draft Due: Sep. 15 Final Draft Due: Sep. 22 _______points STYLE: (10 points) 1. Appropriate sentence structure (no run-ons or fragments, appropriate use of coordination, subordination, and transitional phrases). 2. Appropriate use of parts of speech (verbs, nouns, adjective, adverbs). 3. Quoting correctly identified and punctuated. 4. Parallel structures maintained. ______points From the New York Times online: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/20/arts/anton-yelchin-star-trek-actor-dies-at27-in-an-accident.html Some elements to look for when using DOCS model Design: Features related to the way the text is laid out on the page. These are physical characteristics of the writing’s format, such as: ? Headings ? Highlighting particular phrases by using techniques such as bold, underline, or italics ? Use of images, charts, or graphs ? Spacing of the text ? Use of color ? Different sized fonts ? Different types of font ? Bullet points Organization: Features related to how the writer chooses to organize the information in the text. Writers generally use more than one method of organization. This can be about the text as a whole or a particular section of the text. Some common organization techniques are: ? Problem-solution ? General – particular ? Matching-contrast ? Topic-restriction-illustration ? Description ? Narrative ? Instruction ? Explanation ? Definition ? Exemplification ? Classification ? Compare-contrast ? Cause-effect ? Discussion-argumentation Content: Text content is not always obvious. Think about what information the author has decided to include in the text and how it relates to the topic, purpose, and audience. Examples include: ? Topics and relevant details. What types of information are included in the text? o Specific Disciplinary knowledge. This is generally knowledge gained through study or work in a particular field. o Insider knowledge. This is generally knowledge that is shared by a relatively small number of people and that is not known by others. o Participants: who is quoted/paraphrased? Whose points of views are expressed in the text? If the text is about a controversial issue, are both sides addressed? Style: Features relating to the language the author uses in the writing. These should be things that stand out. ? Vocabulary ? Specific grammar features, such as passive voice ? Verb choice ? Modals ? Sentence structure ? Jargon ? Figurative language, such as metaphor and simile Values: Often the most difficult to identify. Think about what is important to both the reader and writer. This needs to be specific and can fall under general categories that may overlap: ? Shared understanding of language (general): o Is the author using a specifc type of vocabulary (ex. Slang, jargon) to reach his audience. Based on this, what is important to the reader and writer? ? Shared life experience (general) o What experiences relating to the topic have both the reader and writer had? ? Shared cultural values (general) o These are values that stem from the reader and writer coming from the same or similar cultures. These are often related to religion or societal issues ? Shared disciplinary values (general) o These are values that are shared because the reader and writer have a background in the same discipline. What things are important to people from the discipline that are evident in the text? From Johns, A. Text, Role and Context
 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Rhetorical Information

 

Both articles analyzed are identified as news articles and or obituaries that commemorate the lives of the people whose lives have been lived and have now passed on. The first article is aptly entitled “Anton Yelchin, ‘Star Trek’ Actor, Dies at 27” written by Dave Itzkoff in June 19, 2016. The article reports the passing of the actor who was famously known for his role in Star Trek and includes information of how he died as well as a brief look into his life before passing. It is stated in the article how his parents had both fled the Soviet Union when Anton was a child in order to start a better life and choosing to live in Los Angeles, California. He played many roles in the film industry because he started out as a child actor and had his breakthrough during the Star Trek reboot in 2009.

These information paid respects to him as an actor as well as his talents in the film industry. The article also detailed how he passed away through an accident with his vehicle that was previously known to have been recalled by the car company for creating mistakes in the design that made the people confuse certain functions. This ultimately caused Anton’s unfortunate death. The second article is also somewhat of a news article and obituary given the title “Obituary: Carrie Fisher”. This is about the life of Star Wars actress Carrie Fisher who was famously known for her role as Princess Leia Organa in the Star Wars franchise throughout her career. The article looked back on her life in the film industry and emphasized on her becoming famous and seemingly able to hold her title by just having one famous role in her entire career which was in Star Wars. Although unlike the previous article where the cause of death of Anton was talked about, the second article focused more on Carrie Fisher’s life and acting career and less about how she passed away and the cause of it.

These two genres although already have similarities of it being an obituary and commemorating the lives of specific people that have passed on, also talk about actors that play famous roles in the famous sci-fi franchises Star Trek and Star Wars. Because these two articles involve roles in the beloved sci-fi franchises, typical readers for this kind of article may be fans of the franchise as well as the actors mentioned that have starred in the franchise. The first article involved the safety hazard that faulty vehicles can cause which was the reason for the untimely death of Anton Yelchin and this information may also attract readers who have rising concerns about car safety including ones looking to buy vehicles of the same model that caused Anton’s sudden passing. The second article gave a brief insight on Carrie Fisher’s life and how at one point in her life she formed an addiction to drugs and alcohol but would soon recover. This piece of information from the article may now attract readers who are not only fans of Carrie Fisher but also some people who are struggling the same kinds of addictions and illness at the moment and may find inspiration and strength through the article by reading about how although Carrie Fisher struggled with the addiction, she still managed to fight it and continue her life as well as pursue her career further by playing her iconic role in Star Wars through the reboots developed years after the movie franchise was released.

The articles both pay respects to outstanding actors that gave life to characters in movie franchises loved by many people in the science fiction genre. It details their life stories which helps recount how they have lived their lives even before landing their iconic roles.

D-O-C-S

Design

            In terms of design format and how the texts were laid out on the articles, both articles used images of the person the articles were referring to in order to give a better description for the readers of who the articles were referring to although the second article for Carrie Fisher used more images for the article than the one for Anton Yelchin. Most images used for both article were of their role and affiliation to the franchises they both starred in- Star Trek and Star Wars. The spacing, size, and font faces used for both articles were appropriate enough that audiences will be able to easily read and understand the article. The article for Anton Yelchin only used one header for the start of the article in the title whereas Carrie Fisher’s article included several headers depending on what the section of the article was going to be about with relation to Carrie Fisher.

Organization

            As the articles were obituaries and reported the death of two specific people, both articles had a narrative type of organization to them. The recounting of each of the actor’s lives through the articles made it effective in the goal of commemorating how they lived their life before passing on as well as bringing light to how they died.

 

 

Content

            The first article for Anton Yelchin described his passing and how his vehicle malfunctioning caused his untimely death. Other details also included in the content were of when and where he was born, his career as an actor and how it started as well as other actors and colleagues paying tribute to him after his death. Information such as how a faulty vehicle caused his death and details of this were all important content added in the article to fully understand how his death came to be. For the second article about Carrie Fisher, the content included what role she was famously known for as well as her struggles with alcohol and drugs and how she fought the battle in order to continue pursuing her career in acting. Her works as well as films and books she was featured in were also part of the content for the article as well as her family life. These type of content in the articles made both of the readings effective in sparking interest for the readers and helping them commemorate the lives lived by both person.

Style

            The articles were written in a third person perspective where the author speaks fondly but with mindfulness to situation and death of each of the two people. The vocabulary and grammar used were also very coherent and helped in understanding what the goals of the articles were. Although both actors had a connection to the science fiction franchises of Star Trek and Star Wars, there were no specific jargon used that could be connected to either films which made the article generalized and made for all types of readers as opposed to just being targeted towards fans of the science fiction film franchises. Sentence structures and modals were all very informative and helped in the effectiveness of what the articles were aiming for.

Value  

            The articles and authors, when connecting to the readers had a shared life experience as depicted to the struggles dealt by the two main subjects of the article- Anton Yelchin and Carrie Fisher. A shared life experience wherein although not many people reading the articles can relate to the fame that were experienced by the two, some can identify to losing loved ones to vehicular accidents, or experiencing their own battles of addiction to substances and the like.

Discourse Community Values

Some professional values that can be shared would be the inspiring work ethic shown by the two people written in the article who worked hard to get to the success that they have achieved before both of their passing.

Text Effectiveness

                The texts and both articles were very effective in accomplishing what the message of these articles was trying to send to the readers. The authors used appropriate formats and style as well as properly highlighted and paid respect to each of the individual talked about in the articles by adding the necessary information.

Sitejabber (5.0)

BBC (5.0)

Trustpilot (4.9)

Google (5.0)