Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / For the exclusive use of M

For the exclusive use of M

Management

For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. IN1249 Tony Hsieh at Zappos: Structure, Culture and Change Winner “Human Resources Management / Organisational Behaviour” category The Case Centre Awards 2018 03/2018-6181 This case was written by Noah Askin, Assistant Professor of Organisational Behaviour, and Gianpiero Petriglieri, Associate Professor of Organisational Behaviour, both at INSEAD, with the assistance of Joanna Lockard. It is intended to be used as a basis for class discussion rather than to illustrate either effective or ineffective handling of an administrative situation. It has benefited from the advice and insights of INSEAD Professors Frédéric Godart and Mark Mortensen. Additional material about INSEAD case studies (e.g., videos, spreadsheets, links) can be accessed at cases.insead.edu. Copyright © 2016 INSEAD COPIES MAY NOT BE MADE WITHOUT PERMISSION. NO PART OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE COPIED, STORED, TRANSMITTED, REPRODUCED OR DISTRIBUTED IN ANY FORM OR MEDIUM WHATSOEVER WITHOUTThis THEdocument PERMISSION OF THE COPYRIGHT OWNER . Karlesky in 2021. is authorized for use only by Matthew For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. March 24th, 2015 began like a typical morning at Zappos. Employees streamed into the online retailer’s headquarters in Las Vegas, shuffling by the popcorn stand in the lobby, the makeshift bowling alley between desks, and colleagues dressed as pirates. Once in their personalized workspaces, they answered the daily “identify a fellow Zapponian” quiz required to log in to their computers. And then they found a memo from CEO Tony Hsieh in their inboxes. 1 “This is a long email,” the first line of the company-wide message read. “Please take 30 minutes to read [it] in its entirety.” Zappos had been moving towards Holacracy—a philosophy and form of organizing based upon self-management—for a year now. But Tony felt that the transition was not going fast enough, and had not been supported with the widespread conviction necessary for such an overhaul. Therefore, he had decided “to take a ‘rip the Band-Aid’ approach to accelerate progress.” That approach involved a limited-time offer, as he wrote: Self-management and self-organization is not for everyone … Therefore, there will be a special version of “the offer”2 on a company-wide scale, in which each employee will be offered at least 3 months’ severance (and up to 3 months of COBRA reimbursement for benefits) if he/she feels that self-management, selforganization, and our Best Customers Strategy and strategy statements as published in Glass Frog are not the right fit. 3 In order to qualify for the offer, employees had to read the book “Reinventing Organizations” and watch a talk by its author online. 4 If, after absorbing its message, they remained steadfast in the intent to leave, they had to give notice by April 30. One week after the deadline passed, the press was reporting that 14% of Zappos’ 1,443 employees had taken up Tony’s offer. 5 The 210 employees who left included 20% of the tech department. At the time, Zappos was undertaking a complex migration of its web site, which powered a billion-a-year business, to the Amazon platform. The project, labelled “Supercloud” and mandated by Amazon, was arguably “the single largest e-commerce re-platforming in history”. The timely completion of the transition, scheduled for December 2015, was now at stake. 6 Zappos, which Tony ran and had saved multiple times with his own money before it was acquired by Amazon in 2009, was regarded as a shining example of a dynamic organizational culture, lauded as one of Fortune’s “Best Places to Work,” and labelled a potential savior of downtown Las Vegas. Each of these achievements was now called into question with the substantial scrutiny and potential disruption generated by Tony’s move. Tony Hsieh’s Background Born to what he described as “typical Asian American parents,” 7 Tony Hsieh was expected in his youth to master four musical instruments, achieve perfect grades, and earn admission to a top American college. While he met his parents’ demands, Tony’s aspirations differed considerably. He began to show an interest in entrepreneurship at age 9. His first venture was breeding and selling earthworms. Garage sales, delivering newspapers, and selling his own newsletters followed. Most of his business ideas were short lived and failed to generate the This document is authorized for use only by Matthew Karlesky in 2021. Copyright © INSEAD 1 For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. returns he hoped for, though he was never dissuaded from pursuing new ventures. While he was attentive to their financial success, he saw money as a means to an end. As he recalled, Money meant that later on in life I would have the freedom to do whatever I wanted. The idea of one day running my own company also meant that I could be creative and eventually live life on my own terms. 8 In his college years at Harvard, Tony avoided hours of exam prep by crowdsourcing study notes and selling each collection for $20. He also ran the Quincy House Grille, an eating area in his college dorm, buying frozen McDonald’s burgers for $1, and then cooking and selling them to fellow students for $3. Switching to selling pizzas, which required less travel and generated higher profit than burgers, Tony met Alfred Lin. One of his best and most entrepreneurial customers, Alfred would buy whole pizzas from Tony and resell them at a profit by the slice in his own dorm. The two eventually became business partners. LinkExchange After graduation, Tony took a job at Oracle, but quickly realized that his generous salary did not compensate for the lack of challenge. His desire to run a business was stronger than the appeal of easy money. After a short-lived website design venture, Tony and another friend from college, Sanjay Madan, created LinkExchange, a network of banner ads on websites. Sequoia Capital, one of Silicon Valley’s prestigious Venture Capital firms, provided seed funding and the company took off immediately. Microsoft bought it for $265 million in 1998, only three years after its launch. Sequoia made $50 million on their $3 million investment. 9 As a 24-year-old millionaire, Tony had time to consider what he had learned from the trajectory of LinkExchange. In the beginning, Tony and Sanjay had hired friends and friends-of-friends who wanted to be a part of something special. As the company grew past 100 employees, however, they had switched to hiring smart people who seemed to be more motivated by money. Shortly after, Tony recalled, he began dreading going to work. I was the co-founder of LinkExchange, and yet the company was no longer a place I wanted to be at. ...How did we go from an “all-for-one, one-for-all” team environment to one that was now all about politics, positioning and rumours? 10 Venture Frogs In 1999, Tony and Alfred Lin, who had been LinkExchange’s CFO, decided to start an investment fund called Venture Frogs, the name a product of a friend’s dare. They raised $27 million and begun investing in early stage companies. Meanwhile, Tony bought a brand new loft above a movie theatre. Here, together with exLinkExchange friends, he hosted a tight community that he referred to as a tribe. In addition to incubator space for Venture Frogs, Tony later purchased the building’s 325 square meter (3500 square foot) penthouse solely to facilitate frequent and large gatherings of close friends. The connectedness we felt was making all of us happier, and we realized that it was something that we had all missed from our college days…. I made a note to myself This document is authorized for use only by Matthew Karlesky in 2021. Copyright © INSEAD 2 For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. to make sure I never lost sight of the value of a tribe where people truly felt connected and cared about the well-being of one another. 11 Tony’s understanding of the nature of connectedness had started at a rave where, he recalled, The entire room felt like one massive, united tribe of thousands of people, and the DJ was the tribal leader of the group. People weren’t dancing to the music so much as the music seemed like it was simply moving through everyone…It was as if the existence of individual consciousness had disappeared and been replaced by a single unifying group consciousness…everyone in the warehouse had a shared purpose. 12 Ten years later, combining personal insights with the study of scientific research, Tony would assert his conviction that “the combination of physical synchrony with other human beings and being part of something bigger than oneself leads to a greater sense of happiness.” 13 Zappos: The Early Years Following a frustrating shoe shopping experience in the late 1990s, Nick Swinmurn was struck by the idea of an online marketplace where people could find and purchase any shoe they could possibly want. Swinmurn pitched his idea to Venture Frogs in 1999, explaining that footwear was a $40 billion industry in the US. Mail-order catalogues accounted for 5% of the market, but no serious player had yet emerged online that offered a large selection, or an experience that was superior to visiting a brick-and-mortar store. Venture Frogs invested $500,000—enough to try to grow the business to a size that might catch the attention of a large venture capital firm. Fred Mossler, a Nordstrom sales associate, joined the company to handle the commercial side, and the online store was dubbed Zappos, an adaptation of the Spanish word for shoes, zapatos. In October 1999, Zappos began “drop ship” relationships with manufacturers. It forwarded customers’ online orders to each brand, which would in turn ship the shoes directly to the customer. Zappos did not generate much profit at first, but made progress fast enough that Tony decided to introduce the founder to Sequoia. In spite of the positive indicators and Tony’s endorsement, however, Sequoia decided not to invest. Swinmurn pitched to other VC firms to no avail, and eventually found himself with five days left before Zappos would run out of cash. As employees packed their desks, he received a call from Tony: he and Alfred had decided to make an exception to Venture Frogs’ strategy of making only one angel investment per company. They would give Zappos another $1.1 million to help it keep trying to secure more funding. Tony regarded the founders as passionate and determined, and they don’t seem like they’re doing this just to get rich quick. They’re actually interested in trying to build something for the long term. 14 The Zappos team moved into the Venture Frogs incubator, and Tony joined the company as coCEO in May 2001. By the end of 2001, the business had grown to $8.6 million in gross This document is authorized for use only by Matthew Karlesky in 2021. Copyright © INSEAD 3 For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. merchandise sales. In 2003, as the company reported $70 million in sales, Tony became sole CEO and Swinmurn took the role of chairman. In the process, Tony cultivated Zappos’ “fun and a little weird” culture. He kept things casual— wearing jeans, sneakers, and a Zappos T-shirt or hoodie each day. He preferred to greet others with a hug rather than a formal handshake. 15 He communicated in a casual format, writing emails with bullet points and ignoring capital letters and punctuation. While he continued hosting frequent parties and gatherings with his “tribe” that now included fellow Zapponians, Tony spoke quietly and with little inflection. In a group, he attracted little attention to himself and often sat on the sidelines, enjoying the company of people who were more outgoing than he was. He lived alone, but he regularly filled his five guest rooms with friends, business associates, and people he met travelling. 16 In contrast to his reserved physical presence, Tony was one of the first CEOs to embrace Twitter and develop a large following on it. He believed the micro-blogging platform provided an opportunity to make users happier because of its transparency, and allowed him to build closer connections to Zappos’ customers and employees. As he put it, What I found was that people really appreciated the openness and honesty, and that led people to feel more of a personal connection with Zappos and me compared to other corporations and business people that were on Twitter.17 Growing Pains As sales continued to grow, the company set up a warehouse in Kentucky to carry its own inventory. Fred generated new business with dozens of brands, establishing Zappos as “the Amazon of shoes”. Delighted customers received their order within a couple of days. However, profits remained very low and the company continued to struggle for cash. To keep the momentum going, Tony and Alfred invested the remaining Venture Frogs fund in Zappos, and Tony cut his salary to $24 a year. He housed employees in his loft without charging rent, and sold his real estate to put the proceeds into Zappos. Eventually, he sold the loft too, at a loss, to keep the company going. “In my heart,” he recalled, “I knew it was the right thing to do. I believed in Zappos, and I believed in Fred.” 18 To help make the company profitable faster, Tony cut most marketing expenses and focused on increasing repeat purchases with existing customers, hoping that word of mouth would sustain the company’s growth. This strategy relied heavily on its call centre customer service representatives, the principal point of contact for all customers. Finding people committed to these positions in San Francisco, however, proved to be a challenge. Tony briefly considered outsourcing the function, but ruled it out on the basis of a lesson he had learned dealing with warehousing problems: never outsource a core competency. Tony decided instead to move Zappos near Las Vegas, a city where he hoped to find a larger pool of customer service-oriented talent for its growing 24-hour call centre. The majority of Zappos’ San Francisco-based employees chose to move with the company and found themselves, like Tony, with few friends in Las Vegas outside the Zappos “family”. This document is authorized for use only by Matthew Karlesky in 2021. Copyright © INSEAD 4 For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. Once the company settled in its new location, Tony focused on improving the customer experience, strengthening Zappos’ culture, and investing in employees’ hiring and development. Sales continued to grow, driven primarily by repeat customers. When they reached $184 million, in late 2004, Sequoia finally invested $20 million in Zappos. A Customer-Centric Strategy and a “Weird” Culture Having led it out of the doldrums, Tony kept Zappos focused on its strategy of “WOWing” customers and treating vendors with respect. Zappos’ employees were fanatical about service, constantly seeking to surprise, amuse, and engage customers. Four million pairs of shoes were stored in the Kentucky warehouse, which was next to a UPS hub. The set-up enabled Zappos’ free-delivery policy; orders were guaranteed to arrive within 4 or 5 business days. Customer service representatives often chose to offer repeat customers free next-day delivery. Zappos also instituted a 365-day free returns policy, and returns were more than a third of gross revenue. 19 The “please at any cost” attitude ran through every interaction. As Tony recalled, Some customers order as late as midnight and get free delivery by 8 o’clock the next morning. People ask me if it is expensive to do that. It is very expensive. But we are willing to invest to create a ‘wow’ experience that generates customer loyalty. Our whole philosophy is to take most of the money we would spend on marketing, put it into the customer experience, and let word of mouth be our true form of marketing. Repeat customers buy more and become our best advocates.”20 Tony believed that a customer who called the company was worth five to six times as much over the course of his or her lifetime as one who ordered online. 21 Unlike the majority of online retailers, Zappos encouraged its customers to communicate with it by telephone, placing its tollfree number at the top of every page on the web site, and stressing the company’s desire to have personal interactions with anyone interested. Zappos did not adhere to common call centre performance management norms. There were no incentives to get customers off the phone quickly, no scripts provided, and no upselling encouraged. Tony emphasized developing “personal emotional connections” with each caller. He wanted call centre representatives to be authentic on the phone and to build a genuine relationship with each customer. Reps, for example, were trained to visit competitors’ websites if a customer asked for a Zappos product that was currently out of stock. Similarly, Zappos’ vendor management strategy diverged from industry norms. Vendors’ calls were answered the same day, their emails within hours. Zappos employees would meet vendors at the airport when they flew in to visit, and invited them to play golf the last Friday of every month. 22 The company also created an “extranet” to give them complete visibility into sales and merchandising metrics. Alfred Lin explained, They can write suggested orders for our buyers to approve. They can communicate with our creative team and make changes to their brand boutiques on the site. Why do we do this? The average buyer at Zappos has a portfolio of 50 brands, but because of transparency, there’s an additional 50 pairs of eyes helping run the business too…. No one buyer knows a brand better than the brand’s own representative. So why not leverage their knowledge to help us run better business? This document is authorized for use only by Matthew Karlesky in 2021. Copyright © INSEAD 5 For the exclusive use of M. Karlesky, 2021. As a result, when they feel empowered to manage their own business using the tools and accessibility we provide, they’ll spend more hours helping us than their typical account. 23 Zappos’ culture became even more important to Tony after the move to Las Vegas, and he put increasing emphasis on hiring and rewarding people who were motivated to be more than just Zappos’ employees, but people who enjoyed hanging out with other Zapponians. He favoured the term “work-life integration” above “work-life balance,” 24 reflecting the belief that the two could be enjoyably inseparable given the right conditions and the right people. Zappos was as an intense workplace where an employee could suddenly break into dance on the table during a meeting. 25 Employees, referred to as “members”, were encouraged to be themselves at work. They decorated their workplace with streamers and quirky memorabilia, and the style was casual at all levels. 26 One described the scene as follows: Everybody here was so happy. They were so invested in this company. You could see it, and you could feel it. I was floored. I was sceptical, but I knew there had to be something special here for people to behave that way…. You can wear pajamas or bunny ears to a meeting and be taken seriously—actually, they’re more responsive to you. 27 To reinforce the Zappos culture, members were asked to define what it meant to them. New hires received a book of the collected responses. The book gradually grew to include those of customers, partners, and vendors and eventually became publicly available. Tony said, We believe that your company’s culture and your company’s brand are really just two sides of the same coin. The brand may lag the culture at first, but eventually it will catch up. 28 Zappos took pride in being transparent and opened its doors to anyo...
 

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

Zappos Case Study

Would you want to work at a place like Zappos before the transition to Holacracy?  How about after?  Why or why not? (200 words)

I would have enjoyed being as employee at Zappos before the conversion to Holacracy. However, my main reason for wanting to work for the company in advance is based on reports that employees were really happy with the company before conversion with benefits taking the form of; medical, food, life coach, and much more (Askin, Petriglieri & Lockard, 2018). Consequently, the organization allowed employees to grow holistically and be highly motivated to work, thus having significant value for their jobs.

However, I would prefer to work at Zappos after Holacracy. Once the transition is complete, the company's structure shall no longer be bureaucratic; instead, it shall encourage self- management. The challenge with the previous system was the tedious decision-making process that the company employees would undergo, which would delay operations. Consequently, with holacracy, the company shall undertake a more decentralized approach to decision-making and performance by increasing autonomy (Askin, Petriglieri & Lockard, 2018). Therefore, I shall have more room for creativity in the company's best interest, and I shall not merely be following directives hence have a deeper meaning of the purpose of my job. Additionally, when the employees are empowered, they begin to have higher job satisfaction, which reflects in their performance.

However, it is important to note that not everyone shall be suitable in a self-management scenario; some employees need supervision and management to attain success (Askin, Petriglieri & Lockard, 2018).

 How would you assess Tony Hsieh as a leader?  How about as a boss? (200 Words)

As a leader, Tony Hsieh is of the view that the essential aspect of a company is the organization's culture, and upon implementing an effective and efficient culture, other parts of the organization fall into place, such as customer service (Askin, Petriglieri, & Lockard, 2018).  Consequently, in the interest of elevating organizational culture, Tony Hsieh seeks to transition the company into holacracy, basically encouraging self-management. Therefore, it is valid to conclude that the leadership style that Tony Hsieh possesses is transformative. Transformative leadership encourages employees to work without supervision by trusting their capabilities, leading to more autonomy when performing functions (Montuori & Donnelly, 2017). Furthermore, his transformative leadership style is evident from the fact that he values inspiration over motivation. When employees have a more profound belief in their capabilities, the organization's culture is developed, thus motivation becomes an effect.

As a boss, Tony Hsieh shall make an incredible boss being that he values employees and seeks to ensure that they have high job satisfaction when at the workplace. Tony Hsieh believes that ensuring that employees are satisfied thus they perform well, leading to increased customer satisfaction. Furthermore, as a boss, he would encourage work life balance to ensure the satisfaction of employees due to minimized work stress thus leading to higher productivity.

Related Questions