FIN2034 / MFA2014 EQUITY VALUATION The aims of this project is to accomplish an inclusive business analysis on equity valuation of Sa Sa International Holdings Limited (Sa Sa) and makes suggestions to the investors whether buy or sell stocks based on the study outcomes

Finance Nov 11, 2021

FIN2034 / MFA2014 EQUITY VALUATION

The aims of this project is to accomplish an inclusive business analysis on equity

valuation of Sa Sa International Holdings Limited (Sa Sa) and makes suggestions to

the investors whether buy or sell stocks based on the study outcomes.

The aims of this project is to accomplish an inclusive business analysis on equity

valuation of Sa Sa International Holdings Limited (Sa Sa) and makes suggestions to

the investors whether buy or sell stocks based on the study outcomes.

The aims of this project is to accomplish an inclusive business analysis on equity

valuation of Sa Sa International Holdings Limited (Sa Sa) and makes suggestions to

the investors whether buy or sell stocks based on the study outcomes.

QUESTION

There are several methods available for stock valuation in the market. Select one company listed in Bursa Malaysia as a case study.

REQUIRED:

Evaluate the performance of the companies using fundamental analysis. (10 marks)

Use an appropriate valuation model to value the companies and justify the selected valuation method. (15 marks)

Make your recommendation with justification. (5 marks)

GUIDELINE:

Word limit 3000.
Section headers should be clear and concise.
The write-up should be marginalized with neat and aligned left and right, CONSISTENT indents.
Reports SHOULD consist of both in-text (within the write-up) and references.
All appendices (if ANY) should be included with justification.
FORMAT: 12 p.t.s. Times New Roman, adjusted margins, 1.5 spacing except for sources or notes after images or tables (1.0 spacing)
Up to 2 Marks will be deducted from ‘report presentation’ when the above does not comply.
You are required to sign off the attached plagiarism statement. The similarity index should not exceed 15%.
Please arrange your assignment base on the following sequence:

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

REPORT RUBRIC (30%)

Student Name:

Student ID Number:

Programme: BACHELOR OF SCIENCE (HONS) FINANCIAL ANALYSIS

Skill Traits	Descriptions	F	D	C	B	A	Score Marks	Score Grade
Demonstrate knowledge of evaluating the performance of the companies	Able to evaluate the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts	No/little effort on evaluating the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts	Minimal grasp on evaluating the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts	Adequate grasp on evaluating the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts	Good on evaluating the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts	Excellent on evaluating the performance of the companies based on relevant theories and concepts
	(10 marks)	(1-2 marks)	(3-4 marks)	(5-6 marks)	(7-8 marks)	(9-10 marks)
Demonstrate knowledge of using the appropriate valuation model and justifications the model.	Able to use appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.	No/unclear on the demonstrate knowledge of using appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.	Minimal grasp on the demonstrates knowledge of using appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.	Adequate grasp on the demonstrates knowledge of using appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.	Good on the demonstrate knowledge of using appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.	Excellent on demonstrating knowledge of using appropriate valuation model and justification of the model.
	(15 marks)	(1-4 marks)	(5-7 marks)	(8-10 marks)	(11-12 marks)	(13--15 marks)
Demonstrate knowledge of the recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	Able to demonstrate knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	No/unclear on the demonstrate knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	Minimal grasp on the demonstrate knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	Adequate on demonstrate knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	Good on demonstrating knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence	Excellent on demonstrating knowledge of recommendations based on solid facts and evidence
	(5 marks)	(1 mark)	(2 marks)	(3 marks)	(4 marks)	(5 marks)