Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Brief introduction to organization, function, and services (10 points)

10 to >7.0 pts

Accomplished

Brief, clear, and succinct description of organization, function, and services

7 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

Description of organization and its function and services is unclear or disorganized.

4 to >3.0 pts

Needs

Improvement

Description of organization is present but unclear in describing functions and services.

3 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Description of organization present yet inaccurate, missing, or late

10 pts

Description of organization’s design: division of labor,

departmentalization, span of control, and authority (30 points)

30 to >23.0 pts Accomplished

Organizational design is thoroughly described with specific examples for each category

23 to >15.0 pts

Proficient

Organizational design is

somewhat

described with some examples

15 to >8.0 pts

Needs

Improvement

Organizational design is identified, but description is unclear or disorganized

8 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Organizational design is not identified nor described

30 pts

Restructure potential for outcome improvement (25 points)

25 to >19.0 pts Accomplished

Thoughtful, innovative, restructuring options are described with specific examples related to design and feasibility; outcomes are identified based on changes

19 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

Restructuring options are somewhat described; examples related to design and feasibility are mentioned; outcomes may be

identified

12 to >6.0 pts

Needs

Improvement

Restructuring options are identified but no examples related to design and feasibility are mentioned; outcomes may be

identified

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Restructuring options are unclear or unsupported; no outcomes

identified

25 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

Applicability to other types, sizes, locations (25 points)

25 to >19.0 pts Accomplished

Thoughtful explanation of why (or why not) current organizational design could work for different type/size/location; examples given in support of position

19 to >12.0 pts

Proficient

Why (or why not) current organizational design could work for different type/size/location is somewhat explained; examples provided could be stronger

12 to >6.0 pts

Needs

Improvement

Why (or why not) current organizational design could work for different type/size/location is identified but lacking explanation or support with examples

6 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Why (or why not) current organizational design could work for different type/size/location is weak, inaccurate, or missing. Examples are weak or not present.

25 pts

Formatted based on APA (7th edition) style; appropriate grammar and

spelling; 1 - 2 pages in length (plus title page, references, and supporting documentation). (10 points)

10 to >7.0 pts

Accomplished

All criteria met and in correct APA formatting, including headings associated with grading criteria.

7 to >4.0 pts

Proficient

Mostly all criteria met and in correct

APA

formatting.

4 to >3.0 pts

Needs

Improvement

A few criteria met and in correct APA formatting.

3 to >0 pts

Unacceptable

Criteria not met, missing, or inaccurate. APA formatting is not present.

10 pts

Total Points: 100