Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / East Mississippi Community College ECON 2123 Chapter 19-DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTS TRUE/FALSE 1)Generally, contracts are discharged by the performance of the terms of the contract

East Mississippi Community College ECON 2123 Chapter 19-DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTS TRUE/FALSE 1)Generally, contracts are discharged by the performance of the terms of the contract

Economics

East Mississippi Community College

ECON 2123

Chapter 19-DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTS

TRUE/FALSE

1)Generally, contracts are discharged by the performance of the terms of the contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. A contract can be discharged by the expiration of the time period specified in the contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. A condition subsequent is a condition that must occur before a party to a contract has an obligation to perform under the contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. In most bilateral contracts, the performances of the parties are concurrent conditions.

 

                                           

 

  1. If a debtor specifies the debt to which a payment is to be applied and the creditor accepts the money, the creditor is bound to apply the money as specified; therefore, if a debtor specifies that a payment is to be made for a current purchase, the creditor may not apply the payment to an older balance.

 

                                           

 

  1. Payment by check is a conditional payment.

 

                                           

 

  1. An agreement that does not specify the time for performance is not binding because it is too indefinite.

 

                                           

 

  1. The time for performance is typically essential in a contract for the sale of perishable property.

 

                                           

 

  1. Unless a contract so provides, time is ordinarily not of the essence, and performance within a reasonable time is sufficient.

 

                                           

 

  1. In a case of the sale of property, time is not regarded as of the essence when there has not been any appreciable change in the market value or condition of the property and when the person who delayed does not appear to have done so for the purpose of speculating on a change in market price.

 

                                           

 

  1. A party who in good faith has provided substandard performance of a contract may sue to recover the payment specified in the contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. The doctrine of substantial performance is concerned with the issue of whether an imperfect performance will be considered adequate to discharge one's responsibilities under a contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. When a building contractor has substantially performed a contract to construct a building, the contractor is entitled to recover the full contract price.

 

                                           

 

  1. A person who substantially performs a contract is liable for damages to the other party.

 

                                           

 

  1. There is no exact standard or test by which to determine whether contractual performance is substantial.

 

                                           

 

  1. All courts hold that when an agreement requires satisfaction of the other party regarding the acceptance of an act, a reasonable person standard is used.

 

                                           

 

  1. A homeowner who supplies the specifications for poured cement walls can hold a contractor liable for damages when the walls that are poured in exact compliance with those specifications prove defective.

                                           

 

  1. The parties may agree that the adequacy of performance under a contract is to be determined by a third party.

 

                                           

 

  1. Contracts may be discharged by the joint action of both contracting parties or, in some cases, by the action of one party alone.

 

                                           

 

  1. The federal Consumer Credit Protection Act gives the debtor the right to rescind a credit transaction within three (3) business days when the transaction would impose a lien on the debtor’s home.

 

                                           

 

  1. In a mutual rescission, both parties, acting in good faith, renew their commitment to perform all obligations set forth in their original agreement.

 

 

                                           

 

  1. For the parties to enter into an accord and satisfaction that discharges the original obligation, there must be a bona fide dispute.

 

                                           

 

  1. Impossibility of performance applies when the debtor does not have sufficient funds to pay a debt.

 

                                           

 

  1. A seller's inability to obtain from any supplier the goods called for by the contract generally discharges the contract for impossibility of performance.

 

                                           

 

  1. To establish impossibility a party must show (1) the unexpected occurrence of an intervening act; (2) that the risk of the unexpected occurrence was not allocated by agreement or custom; and (3) that the occurrence made performance impossible.

 

                                           

 

  1. When parties contract expressly for a particular subject matter, the contract is discharged if the subject matter is destroyed through no fault of either party.

 

                                           

 

  1. A typical situation where the doctrine of economic frustration applies is when the party suffers a loss when a gain was expected.

 

                                           

 

  1. A house-painting contract is discharged if continual rain makes it impossible to complete the painting by the time specified in the contract.

 

                                           

 

  1. By operation of law, a party can be discharged in bankruptcy from debts.

 

                                           

 

  1. A contract provision requiring that suit be brought within one (1) year does not violate public policy, although the statute of limitations would allow two (2) years in the absence of such a contract limitation.

 

                                           

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

4.83 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE