Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / Multiple Choice Questions 1) On November 8, 2013, Power Corp

Multiple Choice Questions 1) On November 8, 2013, Power Corp

Accounting

Multiple Choice Questions

1)

On November 8, 2013, Power Corp. sold land to Wood Co., its wholly owned subsidiary. The land cost $61,500 and was sold to Wood for $89,000. From the perspective of the combination, when is the gain on the sale of the land realized? 

 

 

 

2.

Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Stendall Co. on January 1, 2013. During 2013, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Stendall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Stendall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2013. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2013 was $2,140,000 because of a consolidating adjustment for intra-entity sales less the entire profit remaining in Stendall's ending inventory.

How would consolidated cost of goods sold have differed if the inventory transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar? 
 

 

 

 

3.

Edgar Co. acquired 60% of Stendall Co. on January 1, 2013. During 2013, Edgar made several sales of inventory to Stendall. The cost and selling price of the goods were $140,000 and $200,000, respectively. Stendall still owned one-fourth of the goods at the end of 2013. Consolidated cost of goods sold for 2013 was $2,140,000 because of a consolidating adjustment for intra-entity sales less the entire profit remaining in Stendall's ending inventory.

How would non-controlling interest in net income have differed if the transfers had been for the same amount and cost, but from Stendall to Edgar? 
 

 

 

 

 

 

4.

On January 1, 2013, Race Corp. acquired 80% of the voting common stock of Gallow Inc. During the year, Race sold to Gallow for $450,000 goods which cost $330,000. Gallow still owned 15% of the goods at year-end. Gallow's reported net income was $204,000, and Race's net income was $806,000. Race decided to use the equity method to account for this investment. What was the non-controlling interest's share of consolidated net income
 

 

 

 

5.

Webb Co. acquired 100% of Rand Inc. on January 5, 2013. During 2013, Webb sold goods to Rand for $2,400,000 that cost Webb $1,800,000. Rand still owned 40% of the goods at the end of the year. Cost of goods sold was $10,800,000 for Webb and $6,400,000 for Rand. What was consolidated cost of goods sold

 

 

 

 

 

6.

Gentry Inc. acquired 100% of Gaspard Farms on January 5, 2012. During 2012, Gentry sold Gaspard Farms for $625,000 goods which had cost $425,000. Gaspard Farms still owned 12% of the goods at the end of the year. In 2013, Gentry sold goods with a cost of $800,000 to Gaspard Farms for $1,000,000, and Gaspard Farms still owned 10% of the goods at year-end. For 2013, cost of goods sold was $5,400,000 for Gentry and $1,200,000 for Gaspard Farms. What was consolidated cost of goods sold for 2013?  

 

 

 

 

7.

X-Beams Inc. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Kent Corp. During 2013, Kent made several sales of inventory to X-Beams. The total selling price was $180,000 and the cost was $100,000. At the end of the year, 20% of the goods were still in X-Beams' inventory. Kent's reported net income was $300,000. What was the non-controlling interest in Kent's net income
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8.

Justings Co. owned 80% of Evana Corp. During 2013, Justings sold to Evana land with a book value of $48,000. The selling price was $70,000. In its accounting records, Justings should 
 

 

 

 

 

9.

Norek Corp. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Thelma Co. On January 2, 2012, Thelma sold a parcel of land to Norek. The land had a book value of $32,000 and was sold to Norek for $45,000. Thelma's reported net income for 2012 was $119,000. What is the non-controlling interest's share of Thelma's net income
 

 

 

 

 

 

10.

Clemente Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Snider Co. On January 2, 2012, Clemente sold equipment to Snider for $125,000. The equipment had cost Clemente $140,000. At the time of the sale, the balance in accumulated depreciation was $40,000. The equipment had a remaining useful life of five years and a $0 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used by both Clemente and Snider.
At what amount should the equipment (net of depreciation) be included in the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2012? 
 

 

 

 

11.

Clemente Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Snider Co. On January 2, 2012, Clemente sold equipment to Snider for $125,000. The equipment had cost Clemente $140,000. At the time of the sale, the balance in accumulated depreciation was $40,000. The equipment had a remaining useful life of five years and a $0 salvage value. Straight-line depreciation is used by both Clemente and Snider.
At what amount should the equipment (net of depreciation) be included in the consolidated balance sheet dated December 31, 2013? 
 

 

 

 

13.

Bauerly Co. owned 70% of the voting common stock of Devin Co. During 2012, Devin made frequent sales of inventory to Bauerly. There were unrealized gains of $40,000 in the beginning inventory and $25,000 of unrealized gains at the end of the year. Devin reported net income of $137,000 for 2012. Bauerly decided to use the equity method to account for the investment. What is the non-controlling interest's share of Devin's net income for 2012? 
 

 

         

 

14.

Chain Co. owned all of the voting common stock of Shannon Corp. The corporations' balance sheets dated December 31, 2012, include the following balances for land: for Chain--$416,000, and for Shannon-$256,000. On the original date of acquisition, the book value of Shannon's land was equal to its fair value. On April 4, 2013, Chain sold to Shannon a parcel of land with a book value of $65,000. The selling price was $83,000. There were no other transactions which affected the companies' land accounts during 2012. What is the consolidated balance for land on the 2013 balance sheet? 
 

 

 

15.

Gibson Corp. owned a 90% interest in Sparis Co. Sparis frequently made sales of inventory to Gibson. The sales, which include a markup over cost of 25%, were $420,000 in 2012 and $500,000 in 2013. At the end of each year, Gibson still owned 30% of the goods. Net income for Sparis was $912,000 during 2013. What was the non-controlling interest's share of Sparis' net income for 2013? 
 

 

 

16.

On January 1, 2013, Payton Co. sold equipment to its subsidiary, Starker Corp., for $115,000. The equipment had cost $125,000, and the balance in accumulated depreciation was $45,000. The equipment had an estimated remaining useful life of eight years and $0 salvage value. Both companies use straight-line depreciation. On their separate 2013 income statements, Payton and Starker reported depreciation expense of $84,000 and $60,000, respectively. The amount of depreciation expense on the consolidated income statement for 2013 would have been 
 

 

 

17.

Yukon Co. acquired 75% percent of the voting common stock of Ontario Corp. on January 1, 2013. During the year, Yukon made sales of inventory to Ontario. The inventory cost Yukon $260,000 and was sold to Ontario for $390,000. Ontario still had $60,000 of the goods in its inventory at the end of the year. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit that should be eliminated in the consolidation process at the end of 2013 is 
 

 

 

18.

Prince Corp. owned 80% of Kile Corp.'s common stock. During October 2013, Kile sold merchandise to Prince for $140,000. At December 31, 2013, 50% of this merchandise remained in Prince's inventory. For 2013, gross profit percentages were 30% of sales for Prince and 40% of sales for Kile. The amount of unrealized intra-entity profit in ending inventory at December 31, 2013 that should be eliminated in the consolidation process is 
 

 

 

19.

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2013, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000.

Included in the amounts for Pot's sales were Pot's sales of merchandise to Skillet for $140,000. There were no sales from Skillet to Pot. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Skillet still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2013. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2013? 

 

 

 

20.

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2013, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000.

Included in the amounts for Skillet's sales were Skillet's sales of merchandise to Pot for $140,000. There were no sales from Pot to Skillet. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Pot still had 40% of the intra-entity sales as inventory at the end of 2013. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2013? 
 

 

 

21.

Pot Co. holds 90% of the common stock of Skillet Co. During 2013, Pot reported sales of $1,120,000 and cost of goods sold of $840,000. For this same period, Skillet had sales of $420,000 and cost of goods sold of $252,000.

Included in the amounts for Pot's sales were Pot's sales for merchandise to Skillet for $140,000. There were no sales from Skillet to Pot. Intra-entity sales had the same markup as sales to outsiders. Skillet had resold all of the intra-entity purchases from Pot to outside parties during 2013. What are consolidated sales and cost of goods sold for 2013? 

 

 

 

22.

Dalton Corp. owned 70% of the outstanding common stock of Shrugs Inc. On January 1, 2011, Dalton acquired a building with a ten-year life for $420,000. No salvage value was anticipated and the building was to be depreciated on the straight-line basis. On January 1, 2013, Dalton sold this building to Shrugs for $392,000. At that time, the building had a remaining life of eight years but still no expected salvage value. In preparing financial statements for 2013, how does this transfer affect the calculation of Dalton's share of consolidated net income? 
 

 

 

23.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:

 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the total of consolidated revenues
 

 

 

 

24.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:

 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the total of consolidated operating expenses
 

 

 

 

25.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:

 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the total of consolidated cost of goods sold
 

 

 

 

26.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:

 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the consolidated total of non-controlling interest appearing in the balance sheet? 
 

 

 

 

27.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:
 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the consolidated total for equipment (net) at December 31, 2013? 
 

 

 

 

28.

On January 1, 2013, Pride, Inc. acquired 80% of the outstanding voting common stock of Strong Corp. for $364,000. There is no active market for Strong's stock. Of this payment, $28,000 was allocated to equipment (with a five-year life) that had been undervalued on Strong's books by $35,000. Any remaining excess was attributable to goodwill which has not been impaired.
As of December 31, 2013, before preparing the consolidated worksheet, the financial statements appeared as follows:

 

 

During 2013, Pride bought inventory for $112,000 and sold it to Strong for $140,000. Only half of this purchase had been paid for by Strong by the end of the year. 60% of these goods were still in the company's possession on December 31, 2013.

What is the consolidated total for inventory at December 31, 2013? 
 

 

 

 

29.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory? 
 

 

 

30.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate the intra-entity transfer of inventory? 
 

 

 

31.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales? 
 

 

 

32.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2012, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales? 
 

 

 

33.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2013, assuming Carter uses the initial value method of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a debit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales? 
 

 

34.

Strickland Company sells inventory to its parent, Carter Company, at a profit during 2012. One-third of the inventory is sold by Carter in 2012.

In the consolidation worksheet for 2013, assuming Carter uses the initial value methd of accounting for its investment in Strickland, which of the following choices would be a credit entry to eliminate unrealized intra-entity gross profit with regard to the 2012 intra-entity sales? 
 

 

 

 

 

Option 1

Low Cost Option
Download this past answer in few clicks

8.83 USD

PURCHASE SOLUTION

Already member?


Option 2

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Related Questions