This Module Review assignment requires you to answer complex questions that are related to the topics presented in the module readings and have been designed to develop your critical thinking skills.
Use the course textbook AND outside primary sources to obtain data that support your answers. Follow the guidelines in the Module Review Questions Requirements section, including using current APA style and pasting the questions in bold before each answer.
Questions
- Companies create business records of many types and store the electronic files using an electronic records management (ERM) system. Explain why an ERM is a senior management issue and not simply an IT issue?
- Describe each of the four V’s of data analytics: variety, volume, velocity, and veracity.
- Identify the primary functions of a database and a data warehouse. Explain why enterprises need both of these data management technologies.
Your document submission is due by the posted due date. Your instructor will use the rubric for evaluating and grading your submission.
Save your assignment using a naming convention that includes your first and last name and the activity number (or description). Do not add punctuation or special characters.
This assessment aligns with Module Objectives 1, 2, & 3 and Learning Outcomes 1, 3, & 4.
Rubric
MGMT 221 2.3 Module Review: Questions Rubrics
MGMT 221 2.3 Module Review: Questions Rubrics
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
|
| 25.0 pts
Excellent - The answers contained a VERY HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
22.5 pts
Very Good - The answers contained a HIGH level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
20.0 pts
Satisfactory - The answers contained a MODERATE level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
17.5 pts
Near Failing - The answers contained a LOW level of critical analysis with words chosen for their precise meaning and an appropriate level of specificity.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - The answers contained NO coherent level of critical analysis.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
| 25.0 pts
Excellent - ALL of the questions were FULLY answered.
|
22.5 pts
Very Good - ONE question was NOT FULLY answered.
|
20.0 pts
Satisfactory - TWO questions were NOT FULLY answered.
|
17.5 pts
Near Failing - THREE questions were NOT FULLY answered.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - ONE answer was COMPLETELY missing.
|
|
25.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAccuracy
|
| 15.0 pts
Excellent - The answers are COMPLETELY accurate.
|
14.0 pts
Very Good - The answers are MOSTLY accurate with ONE error.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory - The answers are SOMEWHAT accurate with TWO errors.
|
9.0 pts
Near Failing - The answers are SOMEWHAT inaccurate with MORE THAN TWO errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - ALL answers are COMPLETELY inaccurate.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStyle & Mechanics
|
| 15.0 pts
Excellent - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused AND the data was ENTIRELY free of spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
13.0 pts
Very Good - ALL sentences were properly structured and carefully focused BUT there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
11.0 pts
Satisfactory - SOME sentences were not properly structured and carefully focused AND there were SOME spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
9.0 pts
Near Failing - SOME sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - MANY sentences were not properly structured AND there were MANY spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors.
|
|
15.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Research
|
| 10.0 pts
Excellent - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
9.0 pts
Very Good - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing BOTH the course readings AND outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources AND terminology from the source materials WAS presented.
|
7.0 pts
Near Failing - Scholarly research was conducted utilizing EITHER the course readings OR outside sources BUT terminology from the source materials WAS NOT presented.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - NO evidence that scholarly research was conducted AND NO terminology from the source materials was presented.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Style
|
| 10.0 pts
Excellent - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with NO errors.
|
9.0 pts
Very Good - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with ONE error.
|
8.0 pts
Satisfactory - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with TWO errors.
|
7.0 pts
Near Failing - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with THREE errors.
|
0.0 pts
Failing - Citations and references were properly formatted in APA style with MORE than THREE errors.
|
|
10.0 pts
|
|
Total Points: 100.0
|
