Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER QUESTIONS START AT ROW 88 Long Term Acute Care Hospital Free Cash Flow Projections Revenue and Cost Assumptions Results-No NWC Recovery Results-NWC Recovery Number of Beds 50 NPV $5,687 NPV $10,425 (000 ommited) Year 1 Utilization 26% IRR 17
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MEDICAL CENTER |
QUESTIONS START AT ROW 88 |
|||||||||||||
Long Term Acute Care Hospital |
Free Cash Flow Projections |
|||||||||||||
Revenue and Cost Assumptions |
|
Results-No NWC Recovery |
Results-NWC Recovery |
|||||||||||
Number of Beds |
50 |
|
NPV |
$5,687 |
NPV |
$10,425 |
(000 ommited) |
|||||||
Year 1 Utilization |
26% |
|
IRR |
17.6% |
IRR |
21.2% |
||||||||
Year 2 Utilization |
60% |
|
||||||||||||
Annual Increase in Utilization |
4% |
|
||||||||||||
Operating Expense (% of Revenue) |
7.0% |
|
||||||||||||
K-wacc |
10% |
|||||||||||||
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
||||
VOLUME |
||||||||||||||
Patient Day Capacity |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
18,250 |
||||
Utilization |
26% |
60% |
62% |
65% |
67% |
70% |
73% |
76% |
79% |
82% |
||||
Patient Days Used |
4,745 |
10,950 |
11,388 |
11,844 |
12,317 |
12,810 |
13,322 |
13,855 |
14,409 |
14,986 |
||||
Average Patient Census per Day |
13 |
30 |
31 |
32 |
34 |
35 |
36 |
38 |
39 |
41 |
||||
Average Length of Stay |
30 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
27 |
||||
Number of Patients per Year |
158 |
406 |
422 |
439 |
456 |
474 |
493 |
513 |
534 |
555 |
||||
Full-Time Employees/Census |
4.8 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
||||
Full-Time Employees |
62 |
105 |
109 |
114 |
118 |
123 |
128 |
133 |
138 |
144 |
||||
INSURANCE PAYER |
Patient Mix |
|||||||||||||
Medicare |
36% |
57 |
146 |
152 |
158 |
164 |
171 |
178 |
185 |
192 |
200 |
|||
Medicaid |
29% |
46 |
118 |
122 |
127 |
132 |
138 |
143 |
149 |
155 |
161 |
|||
Commercial Payers |
24% |
38 |
97 |
101 |
105 |
109 |
114 |
118 |
123 |
128 |
133 |
|||
Other |
9% |
14 |
37 |
38 |
39 |
41 |
43 |
44 |
46 |
48 |
50 |
|||
Indigent |
2% |
3 |
8 |
8 |
9 |
9 |
9 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
11 |
|||
158 |
406 |
422 |
439 |
456 |
474 |
493 |
513 |
534 |
555 |
|||||
Billing |
Annual Incr |
|||||||||||||
Medicare—bill per patient |
$27,795 |
0.0% |
1,583 |
4,058 |
4,220 |
4,389 |
4,565 |
4,747 |
4,937 |
5,135 |
5,340 |
5,554 |
||
Medicaid—bill per patient |
$35,000 |
1.3% |
1,605 |
4,170 |
4,337 |
4,510 |
4,691 |
4,878 |
5,073 |
5,276 |
5,487 |
5,707 |
||
Commercial Payers—bill per day |
$2,800 |
5.0% |
3,189 |
7,726 |
8,035 |
8,357 |
8,691 |
9,039 |
9,400 |
9,776 |
10,167 |
10,574 |
||
Other—bill per patient |
$38,500 |
1.3% |
548 |
1,424 |
1,480 |
1,540 |
1,601 |
1,665 |
1,732 |
1,801 |
1,873 |
1,948 |
||
Indigent—bill per patient |
$35,000 |
|
1.3% |
111 |
288 |
299 |
311 |
323 |
336 |
350 |
364 |
378 |
394 |
|
Total Revenue |
(000 omitted) |
7,035 |
17,665 |
18,372 |
19,107 |
19,871 |
20,666 |
21,493 |
22,352 |
23,246 |
24,176 |
|||
Less Uncollectable |
1% |
|
|
70 |
177 |
184 |
191 |
199 |
207 |
215 |
224 |
232 |
242 |
|
Total Net Revenue |
(000 omitted) |
6,965 |
17,489 |
18,188 |
18,916 |
19,672 |
20,459 |
21,278 |
22,129 |
23,014 |
23,935 |
|||
EXPENSES |
Annual Incr |
|||||||||||||
Salary, Wage, Benefits (based on $ per employee) |
$60,250 |
3% |
3,760 |
6,516 |
6,980 |
7,477 |
8,009 |
8,580 |
9,190 |
9,845 |
10,546 |
11,297 |
||
Supplies, Drugs, Food (% net revenue) |
16.3% |
1,135 |
2,851 |
2,965 |
3,083 |
3,207 |
3,335 |
3,468 |
3,607 |
3,751 |
3,901 |
|||
Management Fees (% net rev) |
8% |
557 |
1,399 |
1,455 |
1,513 |
1,574 |
1,637 |
1,702 |
1,770 |
1,841 |
1,915 |
|||
Operating Expenses (fixed + 7 % net rev) |
$1,200,000 |
NA |
1,688 |
2,424 |
2,473 |
2,524 |
2,577 |
2,632 |
2,689 |
2,749 |
2,811 |
2,875 |
||
Land Lease per year |
$200,000 |
3% |
200 |
206 |
212 |
219 |
225 |
232 |
239 |
246 |
253 |
261 |
||
Depreciation (straight line 30yrs) |
$15,000,000 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
|||
Total Expenses |
(000 omitted) |
7,840 |
13,896 |
14,585 |
15,316 |
16,092 |
16,915 |
17,789 |
18,717 |
19,702 |
20,749 |
|||
|
|
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Expenses |
7,840 |
13,896 |
14,585 |
15,316 |
16,092 |
16,915 |
17,789 |
18,717 |
19,702 |
20,749 |
||||
Operating Profit |
(804) |
3,769 |
3,787 |
3,791 |
3,779 |
3,751 |
3,703 |
3,635 |
3,544 |
3,427 |
||||
Operating Margin |
-11.4% |
21.3% |
20.6% |
19.8% |
19.0% |
18.1% |
17.2% |
16.3% |
15.2% |
14.2% |
||||
Net Working Capital |
Notes: |
|||||||||||||
Accounts Receivable |
30 days |
572 |
1,437 |
1,495 |
1,555 |
1,617 |
1,682 |
1,749 |
1,819 |
1,892 |
1,967 |
|||
Inventory Supplies, Drugs, Food |
60 days |
187 |
469 |
487 |
507 |
527 |
548 |
570 |
593 |
617 |
641 |
|||
Accounts Payable |
30 days |
93 |
234 |
244 |
253 |
264 |
274 |
285 |
296 |
308 |
321 |
|||
Net Working Capital |
666 |
1,672 |
1,739 |
1,808 |
1,880 |
1,956 |
2,034 |
2,115 |
2,200 |
2,288 |
||||
Change in NWC |
666 |
1,006 |
67 |
70 |
72 |
75 |
78 |
81 |
85 |
88 |
||||
Free Cash Flows Calculation |
||||||||||||||
Operating Profit |
(804) |
3,769 |
3,787 |
3,791 |
3,779 |
3,751 |
3,703 |
3,635 |
3,544 |
3,427 |
||||
Add Depreciation |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
500 |
||||
Less Capital Expenditures |
(7,500) |
(7,500) |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|||
Less Increase in Net Working Capital |
|
|
|
(666) |
(1,006) |
(67) |
(70) |
(72) |
(75) |
(78) |
(81) |
(85) |
(88) |
|
Free Cash Flows |
(000 omitted) |
(7,500) |
(8,470) |
3,263 |
4,220 |
4,221 |
4,207 |
4,176 |
4,125 |
4,054 |
3,959 |
3,839 |
||
NPV (no recovery in year 10) |
$5,687 |
(000 ommited) |
||||||||||||
IRR (no recovery in year 10) |
17.6% |
|||||||||||||
Year |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
||||
NWC Recovery |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$2,288 |
||||
Sale of Facility at Book Value |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
$10,000 |
||||
NPV with Year 10 Recovery |
$10,425 |
(000 ommited) |
(7,500) |
(8,470) |
3,263 |
4,220 |
4,221 |
4,207 |
4,176 |
4,125 |
4,054 |
3,959 |
16,127 |
|
IRR with Year 10 Recovery |
21.2% |
|||||||||||||
Net Profit (Operating Profit - Interest) |
(000 ommited) |
(2,004) |
2,569 |
2,587 |
2,591 |
2,579 |
2,551 |
2,503 |
2,435 |
2,344 |
2,227 |
|||
Net Profit/Net Revenue |
-28.8% |
14.7% |
14.2% |
13.7% |
13.1% |
12.5% |
11.8% |
11.0% |
10.2% |
9.3% |
||||
|
Study the above analysis carefully, examining the inputs, outputs, and formulas used to do the calculations. |
|||||||||||||
Q1a |
Mulroney did not use working capital cash flows in her original analysis. The analysis above |
|||||||||||||
includes incremental investment in working capital. Discuss why she was either correct or incorrect not to |
||||||||||||||
include them. |
||||||||||||||
Here it is required to consider incremental working capital since it is a case of project appraisal. Hence, incremental investment |
||||||||||||||
in working capital would be a correct choice. When project grows, there will be required more investment on working |
||||||||||||||
capital and incremental working capital cashflows will be considered to serve that purpose. Since the incremental working |
||||||||||||||
capital is used to generate the sales, hence it will be considered cashflows in investment appraisal. |
|
|||||||||||||
An accurate approach would be to include NWC recovery in the project appraisal since here a relevant cash flow is taken into |
||||||||||||||
consideration of the project appraisal analysis. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Q1b |
Compare the decision metrics NPV & IRR for the "no recovery of NWC" and "recovery of NWC" scenarios, |
|
||||||||||||
stating which scenario best captures reality. Based on your answer, give the project a green or red light. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
NPV of LTAC project is $5,687,000, and IRR is 17.6% in Without NWC recovery scenario while the NPV of LTAC project is $10425000, |
|||||||||||||
and IRR is 21.20% in with NWC recovery scenario. Now we can assess that NPV and IRR of the project in with NWC recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
scenario is greater than NPV and IRR of the project in without NWC recovery consideration because there will be more cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
at the project end in the with NWC recovery scenario in comparison to that of without NWC recovery scenario. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
The scenario of “no recovery of NWC" fits the reality. The working capital as well as the whole balance may be not realized at the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
The scenario of “no recovery of NWC" fits the reality. The working capital as well as the whole balance may be not realized at the |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
project end as anticipated by the company. In this case, there is a possibility that the company might not recover the value of Account |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
receivables, and sell off the inventories as anticipated. Hence no recovery of NWC scenario promises more reliable appraisal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Also, in without recovery of NWC at the project end, the NPV of the project is positive along with IRR greater than discount rate. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
By the above analysis, it can be said that project is good choice to go ahead. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Q1c |
Examine the decision metric 'profit margin', and explain if it leads to a green or red light for this project. |
|
||||||||||||
Even though the board of directors uses this metric, it is defective. Explain why. HINT: FCF definition. |
|
|||||||||||||
Operating profit margin is an accounting measure. Operating profit margin metric evaluates the profitability of |
||||||||||||||
the project. It measures the operating profit as a percentage of sales of the project. For the first year, operating profit |
||||||||||||||
margin of the LTAC Hospital Project is negative (11.4%), and for the next nine years operating profit margin is positive |
||||||||||||||
(21.3%, 20.6%, 19.8%, 19.0%, 18.1%, 17.2%, 16.3%., 15.2%, and 14.2%). The average operating profit margin of |
||||||||||||||
the project is 15.00% (Average of 10 Years’ operating profit margin. As the operating profit margin is positive and greater than |
||||||||||||||
hardle rate of 5%, the project can be said as acceptable. High operating profit margin of the project provide green signal with |
||||||||||||||
respect to acceptability of the project. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Even though the board of directors uses profit margin metric for evaluation and appraisal of the project, using profit margin |
||||||||||||||
metric for project evaluation and appraisal is defective. Decision based on the profit margin metric may result in inaccurate |
||||||||||||||
decision making. The pitfalls of the profit margin metric project investment decisions are as follows. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
a) Net profit margin is a measure of profit. Profit margin ratio focuses on profit return rather than cash return. The concept of |
||||||||||||||
of income is vague, whereas the concept of cash flow return is absolute. The long term feasibility of the project can be better |
||||||||||||||
judged with cash flows not operating profit. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
b) Net income is subject to manipulation by accounting treatment and change in accounting policies. But, cash flow is not |
||||||||||||||
subject to manipulation by accounting treatment and change in accounting policies. |
|
|
||||||||||||
c) Net profit margin is not related to wealth maximization rather than profit maximization. The ultimate goal of the company |
||||||||||||||
it to maximize the shareholders’ wealth. Free cash flows used for NPV analysis, and IRR analysis, are more related to the |
||||||||||||||
concept of maximizing shareholders' wealth. |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Q1d |
Reconcile your answers to Q1b and Q1c. |
|
||||||||||||
Profit margin metric evaluates a project through operating profit margin ratio. NPV and IRR evaluate a project through |
||||||||||||||
free cash flow (FCF) from the project. Operating profit is used as an input in the calculation of free cash flow (FCF). |
||||||||||||||
Thus there may be a consistency in the results of Profit margin metric, and NPV & IRR metric otherwise the company |
||||||||||||||
engages in over trading which cause to positive operating profit but negative free cash flows. |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
From the 'Schedule of Free Cash Flow Calculation' it is seen that in the first year operating profit of the company is negative. |
||||||||||||||
This negative operating profit leads to negative free cash flows in Year 1 after adjustment of depreciation, change in NWC, |
||||||||||||||
and capital expenditure. In the subsequent years, operating profit of the company is negative and this positive operating |
||||||||||||||
profit leads to positive Free Cash Flows (FCF) after adjustment of depreciation, change in NWC, and capital expenditure. |
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Consistency in the result leads to consistency in the decision making. All Profit margin metric, and NPV & IRR metric suggest |
||||||||||||||
that LTAC project is feasible and should be accepted. |
|
|
|
|