Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Experiment 5 Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide Goals To determine the differential rate law for the reaction between iodide and hydrogen peroxide in an acidic environment
Experiment 5 Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide |
Goals To determine the differential rate law for the reaction between iodide and hydrogen peroxide in an acidic environment. To determine the activation energy and pre-exponential factor for the reaction. To determine the effect of a catalyst on the rate of reaction.
Discussion When hydrogen peroxide is added to a solution of potassium iodide, the iodide ions are slowly oxidized according to the equation:
Molecular equation: 2KI(aq) + 2HCl(aq) + H2O2 (aq) → I2 (s) + 2H2O(l)
potassium iodide hydrochloric acid hydrogen peroxide iodine colorless colorless coloroless yellow
Net ionic equation: 2I
- (aq) + 2H+ (aq) + H2O2 (aq) →I2 (s) + 2H2O(l)
iodide hydrogenperoxide iodine
The rate law for this reaction should include the concentrations of iodide, hydrogen ion, and hydrogen perioxide. However, if the concentration of H+ is held constant throughout the experiment then its effect will not appear in the rate law. This results in a relatively simple rate law:
rate = k[I–]n[H2O2]m[H+]p simplifies to:
rate = k'[I–]n[H2O2]m where k' = k[H+]p
The rate law for the reaction between iodide ions and hydrogen peroxide can be determined by carrying out experiments in which the concentrations of iodide and peroxide are varied. For example, consider the following reaction and data:
A + B → P Rate =k[A]n[B]m
Experiment |
[A]0 |
[B]0 |
Initial rate ??M?? ? s ? |
1 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.45 |
2 |
0.20 |
0.10 |
0.90 |
3 |
0.10 |
0.20 |
1.80 |
For this reaction, doubling the initial concentration of reactant A doubles the initial rate of reaction (experiments 1 and 2). This relationship corresponds to n=1. Likewise, doubling the initial concentration of B has the effect of quadrupling the initial rate (experiments 2 and 3). This corresponds to m=2.
We can now write the differential rate law for this reaction as: rate = k[A][B]2
The reaction is said to be first order in A and second order in B. Overall, the order of the reaction is 3. The value of the rate constant k can be determined by using the known values of n and m: k= Rate2
[ A][B ]
We can use the given initial concentrations and initial rate for each experiment and determine the value of k for each experiment. For the study we will perform, the reaction between iodide and hydrogen peroxide, there are several experimental requirements:
1. The acidity of the solution must be maintained at a constant level so that the concentration of H+ is constant.
2. The temperature of the reactants must be the same for all runs. The rate constant is dependent on the temperature of the solution. Since the heat of reaction is relatively small for this reaction the temperature should remain relatively constant throughout the process. If this were not the case then we would need to place the reaction in a constant temperature bath.
Forward reaction: 2I– + 2H+ + H2O2 → I2 + 2H2O
Reverse reaction: I2 + 2H2O → 2I– + 2H+ + H2O2 (negligible)
If the concentration of iodine (I2) is allowed to build up as the reaction proceeds then the rate of the reverse reaction will increase and an equilibrium mixture will result. Any rate measured for the reaction under such conditions will not represent the rate of the forward reaction but the net difference between the forward and reverse rates. In this reaction, however, we can ignore the reverse reaction because the equilibrium position is so far on the I2 side that the reaction above does not take place to any appreciable
extent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
time |
|
|
|
|
I2 + 2S2O32- → 2I- + S
iodineyellow colorless thiosulfate iodidecolorless colorlessdithionate4O6 2- fast reaction
As long as excess thiosulfate ions are present in the solution, no free iodine can accumulate because it is immediately turned into iodide ions which are colorless.
The thiosulfate ions are the limiting reagent. So once all the thiosulfate ions are consumed, iodine starts to form in the solution. Iodine is a pale yellow. If starch is added to the solution then a more dramatic blue solution is formed by the complex of starch–iodine. The color change is sharp, and the time elapsed to this point is determined simply by use of a timer. The time from the addition of the peroxide solution to the appearance of the blue color is ?t for the reaction. Since the stoichiometry of the thiosulfate–iodine and the peroxide–iodide reactions is known, it is not difficult to calculate how many moles of peroxide were reduced in the known interval of time. Consequently, the average rate (moles of hydrogen peroxide consumed per liter per second) of the reaction during this period can be calculated.
Rate=- ?[H ?2t O2 ] change in time, measured with a stopwatch change in peroxide concentration, calculated from known amounts of reactants
For the peroxide–iodide reaction the average rate of the reaction over the period taken for the measurement is a good approximation of the initial reaction rate.
An additional and helpful consequence of the iodine–thiosulfate reaction is that the concentration of iodide ion in the solution remains constant at its original value. Even though the peroxide–iodide reaction tends to consume iodide ions, the thiosulfate ion immediately returns the iodine to the iodide ion form:
2I- →I ???→
H2O2 2 S2O3 -2 2I-
As long as there are excess thiosulfate ions present, there is no change in the molarity of the iodide ion.
This means that the rate of the reaction will change only because the concentration of the H2O2 decreases.
If the amount of H2O2 which reacts during the period taken for the measurement is sufficiently small, no significant change in concentration of the H2O2 will occur. Under these conditions, the average rate of the reaction determined for this period will be a close approximation of the reaction rate corresponding to the initial concentration of reactants which is the initial rate of the reaction:
Initial rate = k'[I–]0n[H2O2]0m where [I–]0 = initial concentration of iodide
[H2O2]0 = initial concentration of hydrogen peroxide
In general, the rate of a reaction increases with increasing temperature. This is consistent with our everyday experiences that cooking food at higher temperatures requires less time than at lower temperatures or that garbage decays faster in the summer than it does in the winter. These observations indicate that the rate constant (k) itself depends on temperature. The relationship between the rate constant and temperature is reflected in the Arrhenius equation: k=Ae−RTEa where k is the rate constant, A is called the Arrhenius
pre-exponential constant, Ea is the activation energy, R is the gas constant, and T is the temperature (in units of kelvin). An important point regarding the Arrhenius equation is that the rate constant (k) depends on temperature and on the value of the activation energy (Ea). The activation energy can be thought of as a barrier to the formation of products and its value in useful in understanding the energetics of the reaction. Experimentally, we can determine the value of the activation energy by measuring the value of the rate constant at several measured temperatures. A discussion of this strategy is given in the procedure and calculations sections.
Aside from increasing the concentrations of reactants or raising the temperature of a reaction mixture, there is another way to increase the rate of a reaction. Some chemical species can increase the rate of a reaction. Some chemical species can speed-up a reaction without being consumed themselves. We call these species catalysts. Examples of catalysts include enzymes in biology and catalytic converters in automobiles. Catalysts operate by decreasing the value of the activation energy for the reaction. The decrease in activation energy resulting from the addition of a catalyst is shown in the figure above. An effective catalyst exists for the reaction of iodide with hydrogen peroxide. The catalyst is iron (II) ions dissolved in the reaction mixture. By adding these ions to the reaction mixture we can increase the rate of the reaction.
Procedure Eye protection must be worn throughout this experiment.
Equipment and Materials. Beakers–3000 mL and/or 4000 mL, 600 mL, 250 mL, 100 mL. Graduated cylinders–100 mL, 10 mL. Electric timer, hot plate, 1 M HCl, 1 M KI, 0.04 M Na2S2O3, 0.2 M H2O2, starch solution, ice, and deionized water. The precise molarity of each solution will appear on reagent bottles. Work in groups of 2-3.
Expt # |
Deionized Water (mL) |
HCl (mL) |
KI (mL) |
Starch (mL) |
Na2S2O3 (mL) |
H2O2 (mL) |
1 |
425 |
10 |
10.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
2 |
415 |
10 |
20.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
3 |
405 |
10 |
30.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
4 |
380 |
10 |
30.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
50.0 |
5 |
330 |
10 |
30.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
100.0 |
Expt # |
Deionized Water (mL) |
HCl (mL) |
KI (mL) |
Starch (mL) |
Na2S2O3 (mL) |
H2O2 (mL) |
1 |
170 |
4 |
4.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
2 |
166 |
4 |
8.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
3 |
162 |
4 |
12.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
4 |
152 |
4 |
12.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
20.0 |
5 |
132 |
4 |
12.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
40.0 |
Data will be shared between groups for this part of the experiment. The mixture described in this section should be prepared and placed into the appropriate bath at the beginning of the laboratory.
To study the effect of temperature on reaction rate we need to perform the experiment at temperatures above room temperature and at temperatures below room temperature. Since we are measuring the effect of temperature and not concentration we need to keep the concentrations of all reactants constant for this part. To do this we will choose the concentrations used in experiment #3 from part 1.
Expt # |
Deionized Water (mL) |
HCl (mL) |
KI (mL) |
Starch (mL) |
Na2S2O3 (mL) |
H2O2 (mL) |
3 |
405 |
10 |
30.0 |
5 |
25.0 |
25.0 |
or |
|
|
||||
Expt # |
Deionized Water (mL) |
HCl (mL) |
KI (mL) |
Starch (mL) |
Na2S2O3 (mL) |
H2O2 (mL) |
3 |
162 |
4 |
12.0 |
2 |
10.0 |
10.0 |
Data Sheet Experiment 5. Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide
Name
Name(s) of Partner(s)
concentration of KI __________
concentration of Na2S2O3 __________
concentration of H2O2 __________
*From the reagent bottles.
Expt # |
Time (s) |
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
|
Temperature (°C) |
Time (s) |
cold bath |
|
|
cold bath |
|
|
hot bath |
|
|
hot bath |
|
|
*concentrations are the same as experiment 3 in Part 1.
Time (s)*
* concentrations are the same as experiment 3 in Part 1.
Calculations Sheet Experiment 5. Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide
Name
Complete the calculations in Tables 1–3.
The number of moles of each reactant is found by multiplying the volume of reactant solution added by the molarity of the reactant. For example:
(0.01LKI)??1.0 mol KI??=0.01molKI
? L ?
Expt # |
[KI] mol/L |
volume KI (L) |
moles KI |
[Na2S2O3] mol/L |
volume Na2S2O3 (L) |
moles Na2S2O3 |
[H2O2] mol/L |
volume H2O2 (L) |
moles H2O2 |
1 |
1.0 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*The molarities used in this table are those of the stock solutions.
Experiment 5. Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide
Name
To determine the rate law we need to know the initial concentrations of the reactants. This is found by dividing the initial number of moles for each reactant by the total volume of the solution. The initial number of moles was calculated in Table 1 for each reactant.
Total volume of solution (mL) Total volume of solution (L)
Expt # |
initial moles KI |
[KI]0 mol/L |
initial moles Na2S2O3 |
[Na2S2O3]0 mol/L |
initial moles H2O2 |
[H2O2]0 mol/L |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
To calculate the rate of reaction we need to determine what the change in concentration of one of the reactants or products was in each experiment. We'll choose hydrogen peroxide. To determine the change in concentration we need to know how many moles were consumed (because peroxide is a reactant) and how long it took those moles of peroxide to be consumed). Only some of the hydrogen peroxide was consumed, so we can't directly determine how many moles were consumed. But we do know that all of the thiosulfate was consumed. Since all of the thiosulfate was consumed we just need to calculate how many moles of thiosulfate we initially put into the solution. The number of moles of peroxide consumed is related to this number of moles of thiosulfate by the molar rations for the equations in the reactions:
Consider the following equations:
2I– + 2H+ + H2O2 → I2 + 2H2O
I2 + 2S2O32– → 2I– + S4O62–
we see that the molar ratios are:
1molH2O2 and 2molS2O3 2-
1molI2 1molI2 so 12molHmolS2 2OO2-3 2
If we calculate the moles of S2O32– that were in the mixture and multiply this number by 1/2, we then have the moles of peroxide consumed. Remember that when all of the S2O32– is used the color changes to blue, the timer is stopped, and the reading on the timer is ?t. The calculation is:
initialmolesS2O32- ?? 1molHO ?? = moles H 2O 2 used ? 2 molS2O3 ?
Expt # |
moles H2O2 used |
volume (L)* |
[H2O2] used mol/L |
time (s) |
rate (M/s)** |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
*This is the total volume of the mixture.
**The rate is Rate=- where the change in the concentration is [H2O2] used and ?t is the time that it took for the solution to change color.
Complete Table 4. From the calculations in the table generate two graphs. The first graph is log (Rate) versus log[H2O2]. The second graph is log (Rate) versus log[I–]. The purpose behind these graphs is given below.
Expt # |
log (rate) |
[H2O2]0* |
log [H2O2]0 |
[I–]0 |
log [I–]0* |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
*From Table 2
We wish to find the orders of the reactants, m and n:
Initial rate = k'[I–]0n[H2O2]0nm
By taking the log of both sides of the rate law we can do this.
log (Initial rate) = log (k') + mlog[H2O2]0 + nlog[I–]0
Now, suppose that we make multiple measurements of the rate in which we vary the initial concentration of H2O2 but keep the initial concentration of I– constant. The rate will change because [H2O2]0 changes. But any change in the rate depends only on the change in initial H2O2 concentration. The rate depends on H2O2 only. We can generate a graph that shows this to be the case. If we make a graph of log (Rate) versus log [H2O2]0 then we get the following result:
log (Initial rate) = log (k') + mlog[H2O2]0 + nlog[I–] where the constant is equal to log (k') + nlog[I–]
log (Initial rate) = mlog[H2O2]0 + Constant
y = mx + b
This result is the familiar linear relationship. In this case, the order of peroxide (m) is the slope of the graph. The y-intercept is unimportant to us since we merely want the order n. Note that this graph only
works for the case where the concentration of iodide is constant. If the iodide and peroxide concentrations
change simultaneously then we can't use this analysis.
If we want to find the order of iodide (n) we can do the same analysis. But we need to pick data in which the initial iodide concentration changes and the initial peroxide concentration remains constant. If we review the initial concentration data from Table 2 we can find data in which this is the case. We can then generate a second graph
log(Initial rate) = log (k') + mlog[H2O2]0 + nlog[I–]
log(Initial rate) = nlog[I–] + constant where the constant is log (k') + mlog[H2O2]0
Again, the slope of the graph gives us the order of the reactant, in this case, iodide.
Using the values of m and n to 2 significant figures
(from the graphs), the initial rate, and the initial concentrations of the peroxide and iodide, calculate the rate constant k for each of the five runs. The values should be the same because k is only a function of temperature for a given reaction. However, due to experimental error the five values of k that you calculate will probably be somewhat different. The equation to calculate k is: k=[Hinitailrate O2 ] m[I-]n
2
The values of m and n should be entered to two significant figures. The average value of k is found by adding the five values and dividing by five.
Expt |
[H2O2]0* |
[H2O2]0m |
[I–]0* |
[I–]0n |
initial rate (M/s) |
k |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of m (2 sig fig) = Value of n (2 sig fig) = |
|
|||||
average value of k = |
|
|||||
standard deviation of k = |
|
*From Table 2.
Calculate the standard deviation of your values of k. The standard deviation s, is a measure of how close the measured values are to one another and is defined as:
s= (k1-k)2+(k2-k)2+...+(kn -k)2
n-1 where k1, k2, k3, k4, k5 are the five rate constants and k is the average
value of the rate constant. n = the number of measurements, in this case n = 5. The standard deviation is a measure of the variability of your measurements. If the only errors made in the experiment are random errors, then the smaller the standard deviation, the less the random error in your measurements.
In the first part of this experiment, we took data which allows us to calculate k, the rate constant for the reaction, and m and n, the partial orders of the reactants. But k, while not sensitive to concentration, is temperature dependant, i.e., it will change if you change the temperature of the reaction. We can take advantage of this temperature dependence of k. Consider the Arrhenius equation: k =Ae-RTEa
where A is known as the frequency factor or pre-exponential factor, e is the base of the natural logarithm system, Ea is the activation energy in joules/mole, R = 8.31 J is the ideal gas law constant, and T is
Kmol
the temperature in kelvin.
Exponential equations like the Arrhenius equation produce curved lines when plotted. It is desirable to convert the equation into that of a straight line, because then the activation energy and the pre-exponential factor can be found. The way to convert an exponential equation into a straight line equation is to take the natural logarithm (ln) of both sides of the equation:
T |
? |
? |
|
|
R
y = m x + b
Notice that taking the natural log of both sides results in a linear equation (just as in Part 1). If the natural logarithm of k (ln (k)) is plotted versus the reciprocal of the temperature (1/T) a straight line is produced. The slope, m of the line, is then the negative of the activation energy divided by the ideal gas constant, and the yintercept, b, is the natural logarithm of the pre-exponential factor:
m = – Ea/R b = ln (A)
Ea = –mR A = eb
Reaction conditions |
T (oC)* |
T (K)** |
time (s)* |
rate (M/s) |
k |
ln k |
1/T (K-1) |
hot bath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hot bath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
room temp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cold bath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cold bath |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ea = |
A = |
*From the Data Table.
**TK = T°C + 273
Determine the activation energy Ea and the frequency factor A.
Using the remaining room temperature solution #3 that was prepared at the beginning of the lab, your instructor will perform an experiment at room temperature after one milliliter of a catalyst, a solution of Fe(III) ions, has been added. Record your results in the table below.
Reaction of Expt #3 solution |
Solution temperature (oC) |
Time with catalyst (s)* |
Time without catalyst (s)** |
Reaction with catalyst of l mL iron (II) solution |
|
|
|
*From Data Table for Part 3
**From Experiment #3 of Part 1.
Experiment 5. Kinetics: The Oxidation of Iodide by Hydrogen Peroxide
Results
Name
Write the differential rate law for the reaction between iodide and hydrogen peroxide.
For most purposes, if a small percentage of the reactants are used (less than 10%), the concentration change may be ignored when comparing the initial rate to the average rate. Show, by calculation, that for the present experiments, the number of moles of peroxide used in each run and then calculate what percent of the original hydrogen peroxide was used.
What are the values of the activation energy and the Arrhenius pre-exponential factor for the reaction between iodide and hydrogen peroxide? Be sure to include the correct units and number of significant figures.
Ea A
Compare the rate of the catalyzed reaction to the uncatalyzed reaction. Would you say the iron(II) ions are a good catalyst for this reaction? Why?
Already member? Sign In