Homework answers / question archive / Step 1: You will first post drafts of your two texts in two different places (make sure you post both of your texts in both places): Peer Review of Genre shift 1 of 2 and Peer Review of Genre Shift 2 of 2

Step 1: You will first post drafts of your two texts in two different places (make sure you post both of your texts in both places): Peer Review of Genre shift 1 of 2 and Peer Review of Genre Shift 2 of 2

English

Share With

---

Step 1:

You will first post drafts of your two texts in two different places (make sure you post both of your texts in both places): Peer Review of Genre shift 1 of 2 and Peer Review of Genre Shift 2 of 2.

Step 2:

After you post your drafts, your instructor will assign you two classmates to peer review. After that, you will be able to access your peer’s drafts and provide peer review feedback. To offer peer review to your classmates, you will use the following 9 questions to guide your feedback. Since there are 8 questions, you should post at least 8 specific comments on your peer’s draft.

Note: Do not add comments to the peer review rubric. Instead, you should leave your feedback directly on the document that your peer submitted, as shown in the video. (Canvas may instruct you to leave comments on the rubric, but the rubric is for the instructor to complete.) Your comments will save as you go.

NOTE: if you want to see the questions below as you peer review, you must keep this assignment up in one tab and open your peer's paper in another window.

First, look at the written text (there should be a longer written text and a creative text). Your classmate may have written a web-article, Op-Ed, Letter to the Editor, etc.

1. Who is the specific audience for , the extended written text? How do you know? What specific part(s) of this text let you know who the specific audience is? Or, if you are unsure of the audience, include a comment that states this and then explain your confusion/uncertainty. Remember to help your classmate understand what could be made better.
2. What is the specific stance taken by this text, the written genre? How do you know? What specific part(s) of this text let you know the specific stance? Or, if you are unsure of the stance, include a comment that states this and then explain your confusion/uncertainty. What do you think of the evidence/examples given in the text to support that stance--are they convincing and well-reasoned?
3. Does this text the written genre, use multiple sources to advocate a particular stance? If so, comment on an area where the author uses outside sources particularly well and explain what works well. If not, identify an area where a) sources could be integrated into the source or b) where they could be integrated better.
4. Does this text, the written genre, include citations for their research in genre-appropriate ways, such as in-text citations or hyperlinks? If so, comment on how effective these are for the particular audience and persuasive stance. Be specific. If not, identify some areas where a hyperlink might be an effective addition.
   
   Now look at the second text, which should be more creative in nature.
    
5. Who is the specific audience for Text 2? How do you know? What specific part(s) of Text 2 let you know who the audience is? Or, if you are unsure of the audience, include a comment that states this and explains your confusion/uncertainty.
6. What is the specific genre of Text 2? How consistently did Text 2 stick to expectations for this genre? Here, you might comment on the visual appearance, the word choice and/or level of formality, and/or the organization of Text 2 and whether or not these aspects make sense for the particular genre of Text 2.
7. What is the specific purpose of Text 2? How do you know this is the purpose? Or, if you are unsure of the purpose, include a comment that states this and explains your confusion/uncertainty.
8. If this text is successful at achieving its specific purpose for its intended audience, why do you think that is? What are some areas that shine? If this text could be improved, what are some suggestions you have for your classmates?

Rubric

Peer Review Rubric for ENC1101 & ENC1102

Peer Review Rubric for ENC1101 & ENC1102

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReviewer provided well-developed, specific, and thorough feedback to the writer.		6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeThe comments are provided in the margins of the original text (not only as a summary comment) and the comments clearly respond to the questions provided by the instructor.		2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReviewer submitted a complete draft of their own paper to be reviewed (in accordance with the peer review instructions) and submitted it in an acceptable format.		2.0 pts
Total Points: