To my knowledge, microeconomics is a complicated field for one to understand. All the mathematics, statistics, and psychology carry different meaning with different models. That does not conclude microeconomics is useless.

Plenty of microeconomics models provide impressive statistics of specific phenomena. But not even one model in history that can explain all significant events in the economy. Leave alone economy events, yet no super way to forecast which model gives a better understanding of the future.

Most of these models focus on mathematics, simulations, and observations (visual). Each category focuses on an area of interest as termed. However, microeconomics helps shape intuition about likely or unlikely times to come. It also interprets events on occurrence. For example, if the market experiences high demand and the supply are low, the Keynesian theory would explain that. On the other hand, it may not describe an issue on cash flow in an economy as another theory would.

Thankfully, microeconomics models, in conjunction with other methods of analysis, provides a better approach, in decision making, choosing randomly.