Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / In the Aristotelian or Classical Framework for argument, a writer might target an audience of readers that is undecided or neutral about the main claim (thesis statement) of the essay
In the Aristotelian or Classical Framework for argument, a writer might target an audience of readers that is undecided or neutral about the main claim (thesis statement) of the essay. A section is placed directly before the conclusion for acknowledging opposing viewpoints. Then the writer chooses to concede or refute that view.
Why does the writer not want to spend much time on an opposing viewpoint? Why mention that viewpoint at all? How might a concession help or hinder the main claim of the essay (the thesis)? What are some opposing viewpoints you might include in your definition essay?
When writing an essay using the classical framework, a writer may want to avoid spending too much time on the opposing viewpoint because they could accidentally give unbiased information and do not allow their readers to form their own opinion based on the information that their audience has read. It is important to mention the opposing viewpoint because the opposing viewpoint will help the audience form their opinion. Nevertheless, it is also important to focus on the data and statistical information because if writers focus on the concession of the main claim of the thesis statement, then the riders lose their audience or their audience could become bored while waiting there essay. Some of the opposing viewpoints that I will make in my definition as they are as follows organization through procurement can be criminalized as well. As organ donation through sale or trade.