Why Choose Us?
0% AI Guarantee
Human-written only.
24/7 Support
Anytime, anywhere.
Plagiarism Free
100% Original.
Expert Tutors
Masters & PhDs.
100% Confidential
Your privacy matters.
On-Time Delivery
Never miss a deadline.
New York University - ECON UA
New York University - ECON UA.31
|
|
|
|
Urban Economics
Problem Set #3 due Tuesday, Apr 5, in class
- The third largest city of a country has a population of 2.5 million. Using the ranksize rule, what is the population of the 10th largest city?
- Assume an urban cluster’s income (I) is given by the function I=4N, where N denotes the cluster’s population in million. The cluster’s diseconomies of aggregation (C) are given by C=0.5N2.
- Calculate the city’s utility maximizing population.
- At this population, how large is the resulting utility?
- Calculate the resulting utility if the population were on million higher and one million lower than the optimum.
- Assume the utility functions for two cities are identical and are given by U=N - 0.1*N2, where N denotes the city’s population in million.
- What is each city’s utility maximizing population?
- If each city had a population of 6.5 million people, how would these cities change their size? Assuming that the total population of 13 million cannot be changed, would there be a smaller and a larger city? Would there be three or more cities? Or would there be no change at all. Explain.
Expert Solution
|
|
|
|
Urban Economics
Problem Set #3 due Tuesday, Apr 5, in class
- The third largest city of a country has a population of 2.5 million. Using the ranksize rule, what is the population of the 10th largest city?
Answer: The rank-size rule states that Ni=C/Ri, where N=population and R=rank of the ith city. C is a constant, i.e., the population of the largest city.
If the third largest city has a population of 2.5m, the largest one has 7.5m. Thus, the 10th largest city has a population of 0.75m.
- Assume an urban cluster’s income (I) is given by the function I=4N, where N denotes the cluster’s population in million. The cluster’s diseconomies of aggregation (C) are given by C=0.5N2.
- Calculate the city’s utility maximizing population.
- At this population, how large is the resulting utility?
- Calculate the resulting utility if the population were on million higher and one million lower than the optimum.
Answer:
-
- if I=4N à MI=4
if C=0.5N2 à MC=N
MI=MC à N=4
-
- at N=4 à I=16 and C=8 à U=I-C=8 (c) at N=5 à I=20 and C=12.5 à U=7.5
at N=3 à I=12 and C=4.5 à U=7.5
- Assume the utility functions for two cities are identical and are given by U=N - 0.1*N2, where N denotes the city’s population in million.
- What is each city’s utility maximizing population?
- If each city had a population of 6.5 million people, how would these cities change their size? Assuming that the total population of 13 million cannot be changed, would there be a smaller and a larger city? Would there be three or more cities? Or would there be no change at all. Explain.
Answers:
-
- set MU equal to zero and solve for N
MU=1-0.2N=0 à 0.2N=1 à N=5
-
- A population of 6.5m is well above the utility maximizing population for each city. Nevertheless, the outcome is a stable equilibrium and there won’t be any change. The reasoning is the following. The first person that moves away from
|
one of the cities will experience a loss in utility and will move right back. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4) |
|
|
|
Correct or |
|
|
|
false? Do not explain |
|
|
|
( |
|
a) The K=6 principle of the Central Place Theory is reflected in the hexagonal |
|
market form (“hexa” in Greek means 6). |
|
FALSE |
|
|
|
( |
|
b) In the K=3 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central |
|
place serves exactly its own |
|
|
|
market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities. |
|
FALSE |
|
|
|
( |
|
c) In the K=4 principle of the Central Place Theory suggests that each central |
|
place serves exactly its own market plus 3 markets of adjacent cities. |
|
CORRECT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5) |
|
|
|
Innovation and Growth: |
|
|
|
Suppose a region’s work |
|
force of 14 million is initially split equally between two |
|
cities, X and Y. The urban utility curve peaks at 4 million workers, and beyond |
|
that point the slope is constantly |
|
- |
|
$3 per million workers. The initial equilibrium |
|
utility is $60. Suppose city X e |
|
xperiences technological innovation that shifts its |
|
utility curve upward by $12. |
|
|
|
( |
|
a) Draw a pair of utility curves, one for X and one for Y, and label the positions |
|
immediately after the innovation (before any migration) as |
|
x |
|
|
|
for city X and |
|
y |
|
|
|
for |
|
city Y. U |
|
se arrows along the curves to indicate that migration that follows. Show |
|
the long |
|
- |
|
run equilibrium using |
|
x’ |
|
|
|
and |
|
y’ |
|
|
|
respectively. |
|
|
|
( |
|
b) For the new equilibrium (after migration) calculate the utility and the |
|
population in each city. |
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
a) In the Figure below, |
|
both cities start at |
|
i |
|
. X, the innovative city, then moves to |
|
j |
|
. However it cannot maintain the utility gain since people from the Y move to X. |
|
At the end, utility in X will fall from |
|
j |
|
|
|
to |
|
b |
|
, and utility in Y will grow from |
|
i |
|
|
|
to |
|
s |
|
. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
( |
|
b) new utility is |
|
$66, the populations are 9 million (X) and 5 million (Y) |
Archived Solution
You have full access to this solution. To save a copy with all formatting and attachments, use the button below.
For ready-to-submit work, please order a fresh solution below.





