Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / MGMT 650 Fall 2016 Problem Set 4 Hypothesis testing with 2 populations: UMUC's Business Management department is concerned that dual degree students may be receiving lower grades than the regular management students
MGMT 650 Fall 2016 Problem Set 4
UMUC's Business Management department is concerned that dual degree students may be receiving lower grades than the regular management students. Two independent random samples have been selected. 150 observations from population 1 (dual degree students) and 150 from population 2 (management only degree.) It is known from past studies that the population variance for dual degree students is 4.5 and the population variance for management only students is 5.0. The current study found that the mean score for the dual degree students is 79 and the mean score for the management only students is 82.
UMUC wants to use a new tutorial to teach the students about business ethics. As an experiment the administrator randomly selected 15 students and randomly assigned them to one of three groups which include either a PowerPoint presentation created by the faculty, AuthorGen Presentation created by the faculty, or a well known tutorial by the ABC company. After completing their assigned tutorial, the students are given a Business Ethics test. At the .01 significance level, can UMUC conclude that there is a difference between how well the different tutorials work for the students?
Here is a good website where you can find the f table for significance level .01 http://www.socr.ucla.edu/Applets.dir/F_Table.html#FTable0.01
PowerPoint Tutorial (X1) |
AuthorGen Tutorial (X2) |
ABC Tutorial (X3) |
68 |
79 |
75 |
85 |
86 |
83 |
91 |
82 |
78 |
87 |
92 |
86 |
88 |
91 |
81 |
Use Excel’s 2-sample variances data analysis tool to solve the following problem. A well-known ice cream store wants to test two different methods for scooping ice cream so they can use the one that has the least variability in their training of new and current employees. It took a sample of the ice cream cones scooped and measured the weights.
Use the F-Test Two-Sample for Variances to test the hypothesis that the variances between the two methods are the same. Interpret the results.
Method 1 |
Method 2 |
4.7 |
3.7 |
3.7 |
4.1 |
3.2 |
3.5 |
3.1 |
5.5 |
3.9 |
4.1 |
4.8 |
4.7 |
3.1 |
4.9 |
5.1 |
3.5 |
4.9 |
3.9 |
5.3 |
3.7 |
2.8 |
4.8 |
4.2 |
5 |
5.3 |
|
4.4 |
|
4.6 |
|
The director for Weight Watchers International wants to determine if the changes in their program are still allowing members to lose weight. She selected 25 Weight Watcher members at random and compared their weight at the start of the program to their weight 6 months later. Here are the results: (The weight in the column labeled “Before” represents their weight at the start of the six-month period and “After” represents their weights six months later.) The director used .05 as the significance level.
Use Excel to determine if weight “Before” equals weight “After” against the alternative that weight “After” is less than “Before.” State your conclusion.
Person |
Before |
After |
1 |
173 |
164 |
2 |
192 |
191 |
3 |
185 |
176 |
4 |
177 |
176 |
5 |
196 |
189 |
6 |
178 |
169 |
7 |
196 |
196 |
8 |
181 |
172 |
9 |
158 |
158 |
10 |
201 |
193 |
11 |
191 |
185 |
12 |
193 |
190 |
13 |
176 |
175 |
14 |
212 |
210 |
15 |
177 |
173 |
16 |
183 |
180 |
17 |
211 |
204 |
18 |
198 |
192 |
19 |
157 |
152 |
20 |
213 |
209 |
21 |
161 |
153 |
22 |
177 |
168 |
23 |
210 |
203 |
24 |
192 |
186 |
25 |
178 |
170 |
|
|
|
Graph each set of data and determine if there is a correlation and how strong it is. State if that relationship is negative or positive.
$2,186.80 |
1997 |
$2,068.20 |
2015 |
$1,670.40 |
2015 |
$1,519.60 |
2012 |
$1,516.00 |
2015 |
$1,405.40 |
2015 |
$1,341.50 |
2011 |
$1,276.50 |
2013 |
$1,215.40 |
2013 |
$1,159.40 |
2015 |
$1,151.10 |
2016 |
$1,123.80 |
2011 |
$1,119.90 |
2003 |
$1,108.60 |
2012 |
$1,104.10 |
2014 |
$1,084.90 |
2012 |
$1,066.20 |
2006 |
$1,063.20 |
2010 |
$1,045.70 |
2011 |
$1,029.20 |
1993 |
$1,027.00 |
1999 |
$1,025.50 |
2010 |
$1,022.60 |
2016 |
$1,021.10 |
2012 |
$1,004.60 |
2008 |
$974.80 |
2001 |
$970.80 |
2013 |
$968.50 |
1994 |
$963.40 |
2007 |
$960.30 |
2010 |
$958.40 |
2013 |
$956.00 |
2014 |
$939.90 |
2007 |
$937.90 |
2016 |
$936.70 |
2003 |
$934.40 |
2009 |
$926.00 |
2002 |
$919.80 |
2004 |
$896.90 |
2005 |
$890.90 |
2007 |
$886.70 |
2009 |
$880.70 |
2015 |
$879.00 |
2002 |
$877.20 |
2012 |
$872.70 |
2016 |
$871.50 |
2001 |
$865.00 |
2013 |
$857.40 |
2015 |
$848.80 |
2005 |
$836.30 |
2009 |
$829.70 |
2012 |
$825.50 |
2010 |
$821.70 |
2002 |
$817.40 |
1996 |
$799.00 |
2007 |
$796.70 |
2004 |
$792.90 |
1982 |
$788.70 |
2013 |
$786.60 |
2008 |
$783.80 |
2004 |
$782.40 |
2016 |
$775.40 |
1977 |
$773.30 |
2014 |
$769.70 |
2009 |
$758.50 |
2014 |
$758.20 |
2006 |
$757.90 |
2012 |
$755.40 |
2014 |
$752.60 |
2010 |
$747.90 |
2014 |
$746.90 |
2012 |
$745.00 |
2005 |
$743.60 |
2013 |
$742.10 |
2003 |
$731.30 |
2009 |
$727.60 |
2016 |
$723.20 |
2013 |
$714.40 |
2014 |
$712.20 |
2011 |
$710.60 |
2014 |
$709.70 |
2009 |
$709.70 |
2007 |
$709.00 |
2014 |
$698.50 |
2010 |
$694.70 |
2011 |
$694.40 |
2012 |
$682.30 |
2015 |
$677.90 |
1994 |
$675.10 |
2014 |
$672.80 |
1999 |
$668.00 |
2013 |
$665.70 |
2011 |
$660.90 |
2006 |
$657.80 |
2014 |
$654.30 |
2003 |
$653.40 |
2015 |
$649.40 |
2002 |
$644.60 |
2013 |
$631.70 |
2008 |
3 |
75 |
5 |
90 |
2 |
75 |
6 |
80 |
7 |
90 |
1 |
50 |
2 |
65 |
7 |
85 |
1 |
40 |
7 |
100 |
2 |
70 |
6 |
85 |
7 |
85 |
1 |
70 |
5 |
80 |
5 |
85 |
5 |
80 |
3 |
50 |
3 |
60 |
9 |
95 |
5 |
75 |
6 |
80 |
2 |
50 |
5 |
65 |
2 |
40 |
3 |
70 |
8 |
80 |
4 |
75 |
5 |
60 |
6 |
95 |
50% |
6 |
40% |
7 |
70% |
0.5 |
20% |
4.5 |
90% |
0.25 |
30% |
4 |
70% |
5.5 |
30% |
2 |
20% |
2 |
30% |
2.75 |
40% |
2.75 |
10% |
8.5 |
90% |
1 |
70% |
2.2 |
80% |
1.5 |
50% |
3 |
70% |
1.25 |
40% |
4 |
30% |
3.75 |
20% |
6 |
20% |
5 |
70% |
2.5 |
70% |
2 |
80% |
1 |
50% |
4 |
Already member? Sign In