Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Subject Code and Title BIZ201 Accounting for Decision Making Assessment Scenario Analysis - Individual Individual/Group Individual Length 1,500 words Learning Outcomes Apply relevant accounting concepts to simple business scenarios
Subject Code and Title |
BIZ201 Accounting for Decision Making |
Assessment |
Scenario Analysis - Individual |
Individual/Group |
Individual |
Length |
1,500 words |
|
|
Learning Outcomes |
|
Submission |
By 11:55 pm AEST/AEDT Sunday of Module 4 (Week 8) |
|
|
Weighting |
30% |
Total Marks |
100 marks |
|
Context:
This assessment is aimed at consolidating knowledge from Modules 1-3. By prescribing this assessment, you are able to reflect on the understanding of accounting concepts and be able to apply them to business scenarios like given in this brief.
Instructions:
First Name_Last Name_BIZ201_Assessment3_Workbook.xlsx
First Name_Last Name_BIZ201_Assessment3_Report.doc
Myer Holdings Ltd
Myer is a departmental store chain that began in Australia in the 1900’s. Presently, Myer operates 61 stores across Australia and sells a variety of products ranging from electrical goods, homeware, fashion and beauty. In more recent years, Myer has faced growing pressure from competitors such as JB Hi-fi, Uniqlo, Zara as well as the growth of online shopping.
In this assessment, your task is to analyse the financial data of Myer’s last five years of trading and devise solutions to move the business forward. The analysis will be based on data compiled from Myer’s Annual Reports. Some information is useful for this assessment includes:
Myer - https://www.myer.com.au/content/about-us-myer
Annual Reports - http://investor.myer.com.au/Reports/?page=Annual-Reports
As this present moment is quite critical for Myer, extensive financial investigation must be completed to inform the decision-making process. Myer’s stakeholders are seeking increased growth, profits and to become more competitive. You are expected to complete an Excel Workbook and Business Report aimed at board members.
There are 3 consolidated reports pertaining to profit and loss, balance sheet and cash flow activities for the most recent 5 years. In this section, you must show all of your workings, that is, you must use Excel formulas to calculate your answers. Numbers only will not be accepted.
See the Report Format section for guidance on the report structure.
As this is a business report, the following sections and headings should be included in your write up:
Cover Page – Includes assessment title, student name and ID, subject name and code, lecturer’s name, submission date, word count. Be creative while making your cover page.
Executive Summary – An executive summary provides a succinct summary of the content within the report. It presents information in such a way that readers are able to understand the intention and key elements of the report without having to read the entire document. It is recommended to write 10-20% of your total word limit of the report. This section is not included in the word count.
Table of Contents – A summary of the sections (headings/sub-headings) and pages numbers.
Introduction – The introduction sets the scene and provides context for the aim. It provides background to the issues being addressed only. (Approximately 10% of word count)
Main Discussion – (Rename the headings/sub-headings to reflect your report). This section should provide information regarding the analysis you undertook addressing the key deliverables i.e. Part 2.
Conclusion – The conclusion restates the aim then provides a brief and concise summary of the discussion to demonstrate that the aim of the report has been achieved. No new information is to be included in the conclusion. (Approximately 10% of word count)
References – It is essential that you use Torrens Academic Writing Guide – APA for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing here http://library.laureate.net.au/research_skills/referencing. Please see the marking rubric at the end of this document for a guide to how many references you should be including in this report. References are not included in the word count.
Appendices – This is where you provide supporting material which is unsuitable for inclusion in the body of the report, but still has some value to contribute to the report. Note – if you have included an Appendices section in your report, you must mention them in the main body.
Assessment Attributes |
Fail (Unacceptable) 0 – 49 |
Pass (Functional) 50 – 64 |
Credit (Proficient) 65 – 74 |
Distinction (Advanced) 75 – 84 |
High Distinction (Exceptional) 85 – 100 |
|
|||||
Grade Description |
Fail grade will be awarded if a student is unable to demonstrate satisfactory academic performance in the subject or has failed to complete required assessment points in accordance with the subject’s required assessment points. |
Pass is awarded for work showing a satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and an adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
Credit is awarded for work showing a more than satisfactory achievement of all learning outcomes and a more than adequate understanding of theory and application of skills. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
Distinction is awarded for work of superior quality in achieving all learning outcomes and a superior integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in-depth research, reading, analysis and evaluation is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
High Distinction is awarded for work of outstanding quality in achieving all learning outcomes together with outstanding integration and understanding of theory and application of skills. Evidence of in?depth research, reading, analysis, original and creative thought is demonstrated. A consistent academic referencing system is used and sources are appropriately acknowledged. |
|
|||||
Calculation of financial metrics
30% |
Demonstrates no evidence of use excel formulas and relevant worksheets to calculate appropriate ratios. |
Demonstrates limited evidence of use excel formulas and relevant worksheets to calculate appropriate ratios. |
Demonstrates consistent evidence of use excel formulas and relevant worksheets to calculate appropriate ratios. |
Demonstrates an advanced evidence of use excel formulas and relevant worksheets to calculate appropriate ratios. |
Consistently demonstrates an advanced evidence of use excel formulas and relevant worksheets to calculate appropriate ratios. |
Understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business using ratio analysis and providing recommendations |
Does not use ratio analysis to demonstrate the understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business. Does not provide |
Limited use of ratio analysis to demonstrate the understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business. Provides some/general |
Well-developed use of ratio analysis to demonstrate the understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business. Provides some general and some specific |
Thoroughly developed understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business by using ratio analysis. Provides thoughtful specific |
Highly developed understanding of Profitability, Efficiency, Liquidity and Solvency of the business by using ratio analysis. Provides thorough and insightful |
BIZ201 Assessment 3 Brief Page 5 of 6
40% |
recommendations. |
recommendations. |
recommendations. |
recommendations. |
recommendations. |
Understanding of Cash flow Statement
15% |
Does not compare statement of cash flow. Does not comment and/or provide reason for differences. |
Compares statement of cash flow. Comments on differences without providing reasons. |
Compares statement of cash flow. Comments on differences. Provides some reasons. |
Compares statement of cash flow. Comments on differences. Provides most reasons. |
Compares statement of cash flow. Comments well on differences. Provides all reasons. |
Correct citation of key resources and evidence
Overall structure, appearance and referencing of the report are assessed
15% |
Demonstrates inconsistent use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. Less than 4 good quality references provided. Has not correctly used APA referencing style. |
Demonstrates use of credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas, but these are not always explicit or well developed. At least 4 good quality references provided. Multiple mistakes and errors in reference list. |
Demonstrates use of high quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop ideas. At least 6 good quality references provided. Some mistakes and errors in reference list. |
Demonstrates use of good quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within the organisation for sourcing evidence. At least 6 good quality references provided. Few mistakes and errors in reference list. |
Demonstrates use of high- quality, credible and relevant resources to support and develop arguments and position statements. Shows evidence of wide scope within and without the organisation for sourcing evidence. At more than 6 good quality references provided. No mistakes and errors in reference list. |