Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help

Help in Homework
trustpilot ratings
google ratings


Homework answers / question archive / 1

1

Accounting

1.Venus Creations sells window treatments (shades, blinds, and awnings) to both commercial and residential customers. The following information relates to its budgeted operations for the current year. Revenues Direct materials costs Direct labor costs Overhead costs Operating income (loss) Commercial $357,500 $30,000 140,000 97,500 267,500 $90,000 Residential $160,500 $50,000 260,000 170,500 480,500 $(20,000) The controller, Peggy Kingman, is concerned about the residential product line. She cannot understand why this line is not more profitable given that the installations of window coverings are less complex for residential customers. In addition, the residential client base resides in close proximity to the company office, so travel costs are not as expensive on a per client visit for residential customers. As a result, she has decided to take a closer look at the overhead costs assigned to the two product lines to determine whether a more accurate product costing model can be developed. Here are the three activity cost pools and related information she developed Activity Cost Pools Scheduling and travel Setup time Supervision Estimated Overhead $97,500 110.500 60,000 Cost Drivers Hours of travel Number of setups Direct labor cost
Activity Cost Pools Scheduling and travel Setup time Supervision Estimated Overhead $97,500 110,500 60,000 Cost Drivers Hours of travel Number of setups Direct labor cost Estimated Use of Cost Drivers per Product Commercial Residential Scheduling and travel 800 700 Setup time 400 250
Compute the activity-based overhead rates for each of the three cost pools. (Round overhead rate for supervisi places, eg. 0.38.) Overhead Rates Scheduling and travel $ per dollar Setup time per setup Supervision per dollar.

2.

Madina Electrical Corporation manufactures electric motors for commercial use. The company produces three models called SM, DM and HDM. The company uses a job costing system with manufacturing overhead applied on the basis of direct labour hours. The system has been in place with little change for 30 years. Product costs and annual sales data are as follows:

 

SM

DM

HDM

Annual sales (units)

42500

1700

20000

Product costs:

     

Raw material

$27.50

$47.75

$73.00

Direct labour

$20.00

$35.00

$35.00

Manufacturing overhead

$240.00

$350.00

$350.00

For the past 13 years, the company’s pricing formula has been to set each product’s budgeted price at 110 per cent of its full product cost. Recently, however, the SM motor has come under increasing price pressure from offshore competitors. As a result, the price on the SM has been lowered to $210.

The company CEO recently asked the financial controller, ‘Why can’t we compete with these other companies? They’re selling motors just like our SM for $290. That’s only $2.50 more than our production cost. Are we really that inefficient?

The financial controller responded by saying, ‘I think this is due to an outmoded product costing system. As you may remember, I raised a red flag about our system when I came on board last year. But the decision was to keep our current system in place. In my opinion, our product costing system is distorting our product costs. Let me run a few numbers to demonstrate what I mean’.

Getting the CEO’s go-ahead, the financial controller compiled the basic data needed to implement an Activity-Based Costing system. These data are displayed in the following tables. The percentages are the proportion of each activity driver consumed by each product line.

 

Product lines

Activity

Activity driver

SM

DM

HDM

Depreciation, machinery

Machine time

40%

13%

47%

Maintenance, machinery

Machine time

40%

13%

47%

Engineering

Engineering hours

47%

6%

47%

Inspection and repair of defects

Engineering hours

47%

6%

47%

Purchasing, receiving and shipping Material handling

Number of material orders

47%

8%

45%

Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead

Factory space usage

42%

15%

43%

Activity Costs

Activity

Estimated costs ($)

Depreciation, machinery

2675000

Maintenance, machinery

175000

Engineering

650000

Inspection and repair of defects

475200

Purchasing, receiving and shipping

389600

Material handling

500000

Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory

600000

Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead

742500

Required

Read the above scenario and write a report to the managing director discussing the following key areas:

  1. How Madina Electrical’s traditional product costing system distorts the product costs of the SM, DM and HDMs and prices. Note: You are required to calculate per unit cost and target price.
  2. Discuss general problems associated with Madina Electrical Corporation traditional costing system and highlight any indicators that the current costing system is outdated and flawed.
  3. Calculate per unit cost and target price for each product line using Activity-Based Costing (ABC) system. (Note: calculate the rate per activity driver to be used in the desired activity-based costing system. Round up to the nearest two decimal points)
  4. Discuss costs and benefits of adopting Activity Based Costing for Madina Electrical Corporation.
  5. Analyse and explain the differences in the product costs and target prices for each product line between the two alternative costing systems. Discuss likely reasons for the identified differences.

pur-new-sol

Purchase A New Answer

Custom new solution created by our subject matter experts

GET A QUOTE

Answer Preview

1.

Activity Cost Pools Estimated Overhead Expected Use of Cost Drivers Overhead Rate
  A B (A/B)
Scheduling and Travel 97500 (800+700)=1500 65.00
Set Up time 110500 (400+250)=650 170.00
Supervision 60000 (140000+260000)=400000 0.15

 

2.

In the above question , there is a problem with the allocation of overheads , which is the main reason the Financial controller has suugested to change the sytem of costing to ABC i.e Activity based costing .

The raw material and labour costs remain the same under any method of costing. However the overheads form a major portion of costs and hence an accurate allocation is very much essential for deriving perfect costs . Therefore activity based costing is preferred over the traditional methods of job costing.

Under ABC , the specific cost drivers are identified and the proprotion of the driver for each activity or cost element is tracked down .On the proportionate basis , the costs of overhead will be allocated to the overhead instead of the quantity produced as under traditional systems.

1. The per unit costs and the target prices,under both the systems have been computed in the following tables :

Calculation of Unit cost under Product Costing
         
Sr No Particulars SM DM HDM
    $ $ $
1 Actual Sales price per unit $       210.00    
2 Annual sales (units)           42,500                 1,700       20,000
  Product costs:      
3 Raw material $         27.50 $             47.75 $     73.00
4 Direct labour $         20.00 $             35.00 $     35.00
5 Manufacturing overhead $       240.00 $           350.00 $   350.00
6 Total cost per unit (3+4+5) $       288 $           433 $   458.00
7 Target price = (6 ) x110% $       316.00 $           476 $   504
Calculation of Unit cost under ABC System
         
Sr No Particulars SM DM HDM
    $ $ $
1 Actual Sales price per unit $         210.00    
2 Annual sales (units)             42,500          1,700       20,000
  Product costs:      
3 Raw material $           27.50 $      47.75 $     73.00
4 Direct labour $           20.00 $      35.00 $     35.00
5 Manufacturing overheads : ( Refer WN 1)      
a Depreciation, machinery        1,070,000      347,750 1,257,250
b Maintenance, machinery             70,000        22,750       82,250
c Engineering           305,500        39,000     305,500
d Inspection and repair of defects           223,344        28,512     223,344
e Purchasing, receiving and shipping Material handling           418,112        71,168     400,320
f Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead           563,850      201,375     577,275
  Total Manufacturing costs        2,650,806      710,555 2,845,939
6 Per Unit Manufacturing overhead cost ( Total Overhead cost / Units ) $           62.37 $    417.97 $   142.30
7 Total Per Unit cost (3+4+6) $         110 $    501 $   250
8 Target price (7) x 110% $         121.00 $    551.00 $   275.00

WN 1

Activity Driver SM DM HDM Total Estimated costs ($)
Depreciation, machinery Machine time 40.00% 13.00% 47.00%            2,675,000
Costs ( Total Cost x % of driver )   1070000 347750 1257250            2,675,000
Maintenance, machinery Machine time 40.00% 13.00% 47.00%               175,000
             70,000       22,750       82,250               175,000
Engineering Engineering hours 47.00% 6.00% 47.00%               650,000
           305,500       39,000     305,500               650,000
Inspection and repair of defects Engineering hours 47.00% 6.00% 47.00%               475,200
           223,344       28,512     223,344               475,200
Purchasing, receiving and shipping Number of material orders 47.00% 8.00% 45.00%               389,600
           183,112       31,168     175,320               389,600
Material handling Number of material orders 47.00% 8.00% 45.00%               500,000
           235,000       40,000     225,000               500,000
Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory Factory space usage 42.00% 15.00% 43.00%               600,000
           252,000       90,000     258,000               600,000
Miscellaneous Manufacturing overheads Factory space usage 42.00% 15.00% 43.00%               742,500
           311,850     111,375     319,275               742,500
           
TOTAL COSTS       2,650,806     710,555 2,845,939            6,207,300

2.

· Following the old system of costing since past 30 years

· Usage of traditional costing system of pre determining rate of overheads and charging it on products.(Major flaw in the system)

· Inaccurate allocation of overheads, leading to overcharging overheads on SM & HDM and undercharging overheads on DM.

· The wrong costing leads to wrong pricing of products.

4.

Benefits:

The system identifies the correct basis on which the costs should be allocated to the product instead of labor time.

Labor time will obviously be high for product with higher production.

The systems shows that the product is ideally a profitable product and the profit is actually ($210-$121)=$ 89 per unit.

The product DM is undercharged and due to misappropriation of the overheads chargeable on DM the profitability of SM and HDM is hampered.

Completely gives a new perspective to the cost analysis.

5.

   The product costs under both systems are:

Product Costs

SM

DM

HDM

Traditional

$    288

$         433

$    458.00

ABC

$ 110 $ 501 $   250

Difference in pricing

$ 178

$ ( 68)

$    208

Excess or low costs reported under current method

Excess costs

Lower costs

Excess cost

   Target prices under both systems

Target Prices

SM

DM

HDM

       

Traditional

$   316

$         476

$    504

ABC

$ 121

No file attached.

-->