Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / 1
1.Venus Creations sells window treatments (shades, blinds, and awnings) to both commercial and residential customers. The following information relates to its budgeted operations for the current year. Revenues Direct materials costs Direct labor costs Overhead costs Operating income (loss) Commercial $357,500 $30,000 140,000 97,500 267,500 $90,000 Residential $160,500 $50,000 260,000 170,500 480,500 $(20,000) The controller, Peggy Kingman, is concerned about the residential product line. She cannot understand why this line is not more profitable given that the installations of window coverings are less complex for residential customers. In addition, the residential client base resides in close proximity to the company office, so travel costs are not as expensive on a per client visit for residential customers. As a result, she has decided to take a closer look at the overhead costs assigned to the two product lines to determine whether a more accurate product costing model can be developed. Here are the three activity cost pools and related information she developed Activity Cost Pools Scheduling and travel Setup time Supervision Estimated Overhead $97,500 110.500 60,000 Cost Drivers Hours of travel Number of setups Direct labor cost
Activity Cost Pools Scheduling and travel Setup time Supervision Estimated Overhead $97,500 110,500 60,000 Cost Drivers Hours of travel Number of setups Direct labor cost Estimated Use of Cost Drivers per Product Commercial Residential Scheduling and travel 800 700 Setup time 400 250
Compute the activity-based overhead rates for each of the three cost pools. (Round overhead rate for supervisi places, eg. 0.38.) Overhead Rates Scheduling and travel $ per dollar Setup time per setup Supervision per dollar.
2.
Madina Electrical Corporation manufactures electric motors for commercial use. The company produces three models called SM, DM and HDM. The company uses a job costing system with manufacturing overhead applied on the basis of direct labour hours. The system has been in place with little change for 30 years. Product costs and annual sales data are as follows:
SM |
DM |
HDM |
|
Annual sales (units) |
42500 |
1700 |
20000 |
Product costs: |
|||
Raw material |
$27.50 |
$47.75 |
$73.00 |
Direct labour |
$20.00 |
$35.00 |
$35.00 |
Manufacturing overhead |
$240.00 |
$350.00 |
$350.00 |
For the past 13 years, the company’s pricing formula has been to set each product’s budgeted price at 110 per cent of its full product cost. Recently, however, the SM motor has come under increasing price pressure from offshore competitors. As a result, the price on the SM has been lowered to $210.
The company CEO recently asked the financial controller, ‘Why can’t we compete with these other companies? They’re selling motors just like our SM for $290. That’s only $2.50 more than our production cost. Are we really that inefficient?’
The financial controller responded by saying, ‘I think this is due to an outmoded product costing system. As you may remember, I raised a red flag about our system when I came on board last year. But the decision was to keep our current system in place. In my opinion, our product costing system is distorting our product costs. Let me run a few numbers to demonstrate what I mean’.
Getting the CEO’s go-ahead, the financial controller compiled the basic data needed to implement an Activity-Based Costing system. These data are displayed in the following tables. The percentages are the proportion of each activity driver consumed by each product line.
Product lines |
||||
Activity |
Activity driver |
SM |
DM |
HDM |
Depreciation, machinery |
Machine time |
40% |
13% |
47% |
Maintenance, machinery |
Machine time |
40% |
13% |
47% |
Engineering |
Engineering hours |
47% |
6% |
47% |
Inspection and repair of defects |
Engineering hours |
47% |
6% |
47% |
Purchasing, receiving and shipping Material handling |
Number of material orders |
47% |
8% |
45% |
Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead |
Factory space usage |
42% |
15% |
43% |
Activity Costs
Activity |
Estimated costs ($) |
Depreciation, machinery |
2675000 |
Maintenance, machinery |
175000 |
Engineering |
650000 |
Inspection and repair of defects |
475200 |
Purchasing, receiving and shipping |
389600 |
Material handling |
500000 |
Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory |
600000 |
Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead |
742500 |
Required
Read the above scenario and write a report to the managing director discussing the following key areas:
1.
Activity Cost Pools | Estimated Overhead | Expected Use of Cost Drivers | Overhead Rate |
A | B | (A/B) | |
Scheduling and Travel | 97500 | (800+700)=1500 | 65.00 |
Set Up time | 110500 | (400+250)=650 | 170.00 |
Supervision | 60000 | (140000+260000)=400000 | 0.15 |
2.
In the above question , there is a problem with the allocation of overheads , which is the main reason the Financial controller has suugested to change the sytem of costing to ABC i.e Activity based costing .
The raw material and labour costs remain the same under any method of costing. However the overheads form a major portion of costs and hence an accurate allocation is very much essential for deriving perfect costs . Therefore activity based costing is preferred over the traditional methods of job costing.
Under ABC , the specific cost drivers are identified and the proprotion of the driver for each activity or cost element is tracked down .On the proportionate basis , the costs of overhead will be allocated to the overhead instead of the quantity produced as under traditional systems.
1. The per unit costs and the target prices,under both the systems have been computed in the following tables :
Calculation of Unit cost under Product Costing | ||||
Sr No | Particulars | SM | DM | HDM |
$ | $ | $ | ||
1 | Actual Sales price per unit | $ 210.00 | ||
2 | Annual sales (units) | 42,500 | 1,700 | 20,000 |
Product costs: | ||||
3 | Raw material | $ 27.50 | $ 47.75 | $ 73.00 |
4 | Direct labour | $ 20.00 | $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
5 | Manufacturing overhead | $ 240.00 | $ 350.00 | $ 350.00 |
6 | Total cost per unit (3+4+5) | $ 288 | $ 433 | $ 458.00 |
7 | Target price = (6 ) x110% | $ 316.00 | $ 476 | $ 504 |
Calculation of Unit cost under ABC System | ||||
Sr No | Particulars | SM | DM | HDM |
$ | $ | $ | ||
1 | Actual Sales price per unit | $ 210.00 | ||
2 | Annual sales (units) | 42,500 | 1,700 | 20,000 |
Product costs: | ||||
3 | Raw material | $ 27.50 | $ 47.75 | $ 73.00 |
4 | Direct labour | $ 20.00 | $ 35.00 | $ 35.00 |
5 | Manufacturing overheads : ( Refer WN 1) | |||
a | Depreciation, machinery | 1,070,000 | 347,750 | 1,257,250 |
b | Maintenance, machinery | 70,000 | 22,750 | 82,250 |
c | Engineering | 305,500 | 39,000 | 305,500 |
d | Inspection and repair of defects | 223,344 | 28,512 | 223,344 |
e | Purchasing, receiving and shipping Material handling | 418,112 | 71,168 | 400,320 |
f | Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory Miscellaneous manufacturing overhead | 563,850 | 201,375 | 577,275 |
Total Manufacturing costs | 2,650,806 | 710,555 | 2,845,939 | |
6 | Per Unit Manufacturing overhead cost ( Total Overhead cost / Units ) | $ 62.37 | $ 417.97 | $ 142.30 |
7 | Total Per Unit cost (3+4+6) | $ 110 | $ 501 | $ 250 |
8 | Target price (7) x 110% | $ 121.00 | $ 551.00 | $ 275.00 |
WN 1
Activity | Driver | SM | DM | HDM | Total Estimated costs ($) |
Depreciation, machinery | Machine time | 40.00% | 13.00% | 47.00% | 2,675,000 |
Costs ( Total Cost x % of driver ) | 1070000 | 347750 | 1257250 | 2,675,000 | |
Maintenance, machinery | Machine time | 40.00% | 13.00% | 47.00% | 175,000 |
70,000 | 22,750 | 82,250 | 175,000 | ||
Engineering | Engineering hours | 47.00% | 6.00% | 47.00% | 650,000 |
305,500 | 39,000 | 305,500 | 650,000 | ||
Inspection and repair of defects | Engineering hours | 47.00% | 6.00% | 47.00% | 475,200 |
223,344 | 28,512 | 223,344 | 475,200 | ||
Purchasing, receiving and shipping | Number of material orders | 47.00% | 8.00% | 45.00% | 389,600 |
183,112 | 31,168 | 175,320 | 389,600 | ||
Material handling | Number of material orders | 47.00% | 8.00% | 45.00% | 500,000 |
235,000 | 40,000 | 225,000 | 500,000 | ||
Depreciation, taxes and insurance for factory | Factory space usage | 42.00% | 15.00% | 43.00% | 600,000 |
252,000 | 90,000 | 258,000 | 600,000 | ||
Miscellaneous Manufacturing overheads | Factory space usage | 42.00% | 15.00% | 43.00% | 742,500 |
311,850 | 111,375 | 319,275 | 742,500 | ||
TOTAL COSTS | 2,650,806 | 710,555 | 2,845,939 | 6,207,300 |
2.
· Following the old system of costing since past 30 years
· Usage of traditional costing system of pre determining rate of overheads and charging it on products.(Major flaw in the system)
· Inaccurate allocation of overheads, leading to overcharging overheads on SM & HDM and undercharging overheads on DM.
· The wrong costing leads to wrong pricing of products.
4.
Benefits:
The system identifies the correct basis on which the costs should be allocated to the product instead of labor time.
Labor time will obviously be high for product with higher production.
The systems shows that the product is ideally a profitable product and the profit is actually ($210-$121)=$ 89 per unit.
The product DM is undercharged and due to misappropriation of the overheads chargeable on DM the profitability of SM and HDM is hampered.
Completely gives a new perspective to the cost analysis.
5.
The product costs under both systems are:
Product Costs |
SM |
DM |
HDM |
Traditional |
$ 288 |
$ 433 |
$ 458.00 |
ABC |
$ 110 | $ 501 | $ 250 |
Difference in pricing |
$ 178 |
$ ( 68) |
$ 208 |
Excess or low costs reported under current method |
Excess costs |
Lower costs |
Excess cost |
Target prices under both systems
Target Prices |
SM |
DM |
HDM |
Traditional |
$ 316 |
$ 476 |
$ 504 |
ABC |
$ 121 |
No file attached. -->
![]() ![]() |