Homework answers / question archive / Winter 2023 Ethics of Conf in Global Persp (Discussion 2 -- The Ethicsof 4 < >»Environmental Action – Week 2 The assignment and lesson Content this week was substantial

Winter 2023 Ethics of Conf in Global Persp (Discussion 2 -- The Ethicsof 4 < >»Environmental Action – Week 2 The assignment and lesson Content this week was substantial

Writing

Share With

---

Winter 2023 Ethics of Conf in Global Persp (Discussion 2 -- The Ethicsof 4 < >»Environmental Action – Week 2

The assignment and lesson Content this week was substantial.

For this discussion, go through your assignment submissions this week, your three Word files, and shop for one topic you want to discuss.

Your topic must be tied to good quality, factual, documented substance and reasoning. In that respect, you are already covered.

Nothing is ever absolute. But peer-reviewed articles in respected academic and

professional journals are an excellent bet toward that end. They have been

heavily vetted and critiqued by people who are called "readers." These are faculty

from other universities, sometimes in different countries than you, and who have

high-level expertise in that particular discipline or field and who volunteered to

serve the journal for a period of time, for free, to make sure everything published

is up to the high standards of that journal. These people are generally nice

individuals, but they mean business! And that is good for all of us.

Oh, and the Editor-in-Chief of the journal also reads all the articles that come in

first, and they organize the whole process of editing and critique, and have the

absolute final word on whether or not the article will be published. Many, if not

most, article submissions are not accepted. If an article has a lot of promise but

cannot be published as is, it will ultimately be returned to the sender with

extensive, helpful commentary that guides the author with their revisions.