1) Which of these five constructive argumentation techniques—constructing arguments, evaluating arguments, comprehending deductive arguments, constructing extended arguments, and recognizing arguments—do you think a detective using during an interrogation of a suspect or witness should focus on most? Do you think it's better to "Listen carefully" or "Respond to the points being made" while interviewing a suspect or witness for a crime? Why are you experiencing this? How would you weigh the value of extended arguments in criminal investigations?