Homework answers / question archive / This is a medieval history primary source analysis essay

This is a medieval history primary source analysis essay

Writing

Share With

This is a medieval history primary source analysis essay. You will need to place the analysis in the broader context of that period of time, so make sure you have some knowledge of medieval history and know how to write a primary source analysis in history. Read the two pieces of primary documents attached below and answer the question. I will forward more specific instructions once we start working on it.

Read 6.24 DEVOTION THROUGH MYSTICISM: JACQUES DE VITRY, THE LIFE OF MARY OF OIGNIES (1213) and 1.12 THE CULT OF SAINTS: GREGORY OF TOURS, THE LIFE OF MONEGUNDIS (580S). In your response, answer this: Comparing the life of Mary of Oignies(1213) with that of Monegundis in the sixth century (see above, p. 38), how might you characterize the transformations that occurred in medieval conceptions of female piety? Develop a primary argument or a main point (sometimes called a "thesis" or "thesis statement") in response to the prompt for the week. Thinking of this exercise as less "proving a thesis," and more as "staking a claim" for what you judge to be an important issue or theme found in the readings: your "argument," so to speak, is to convince the reader that you have identified something important and relevant, based on the primary source evidence (not just your opinion, feelings, or speculation). Be sure to substantiate your claims with references and/or direct quotations from the assigned primary sources. Essay should be 2-4 pages Times New Roman Font 12 double spanced For example: 1. Rosenwein, Short History, p. 6, writes about Christianity in the early fourth century that “no religion was better prepared for official recognition. This it received in 313, in the socalled Edict of Milan.” She describes how the Edict of Milan contributed to a crucial transformation of the Christian church, an important but sometimes persecuted minority community in the Roman world, but also a transformation of the Roman Empire. Evaluate the Edict of Milan (1.1) in light of these claims: What was this document? What did it promise to members of the Christian faith? How might this shift in official Roman imperial attitudes toward the Christian church have impacted the church’s status? How might it have changed the profile of Christianity in the Roman world? This question could be "answered" in a variety of ways. One possible argument/thesis might relate to the treatment of church property in the Edict of Milan. Much of the document deals with the status of Christian property seized during the previous persecutions under Diocletian (this is implied, not stated in the text). The Edict calls for its restoration, not just to individuals, but to the Christians' "bodies and assemblies," meaning churches (Rosenwein, Reading, 4). A picture is starting to emerge: under Diocletian and his supporters, the Church was persecuted; churches were ruined and property confiscated. With the Edict of Milan, Constantine initiated a policy of restoring Church property; beyond that (as mentioned in the textbook and in lecture) he donated funds to the Church, granted tax-exemptions to the clergy (members of the church hierarchy), and generally offered church institutions a great deal of material support. Thus, after carefully introducing the Edict of Milan in your essay, one “argument” or “claim” or “thesis” for your essay could be: "Starting with the Edict of Milan in 313, Emperor Constantine's policies toward Christianity contributed to a significant transformation in the material circumstances of the Christian Church, including Christian public places of worship that were restored and expanded after the persecutions under Constantine's predecessors. As a result, building upon its preexisting presence, the Christian Church started to assume a more prominent place in the later Roman world after the Edict of Milan, although the last transformation of Christianity would take generations. Note, one might identify other themes, highlight other issues. One could talk about the notion of the “public good” identified in the source, and the new role that emerged for Christianity in promoting that “public security” or “public quiet” (as imagined in the edict); one might focus on the premise of “free facility” to worship, what that seems to mean, and why the emperors wanted to encourage Christians to worship their God. The possibilities are endless. The Edict of Milan and Constantine also feature in the Medieval Papacy, and will be discussed in class. If you draft an essay before the showcased source is discussed in lecture, I recommend revising your work after lecture before submitting it. Citations: It is appropriate to use CAREFULLY chosen quotations from the primary sources to illustrate your points. If you quote a source, be sure to use “quotation marks” and internally cite the page number within the text: for example As the edict observes, “a Lannister always pays his debts” (Rosenwein, Reading, p. 345). Please note that separate bibliographies are not required. Also, please avoid long citations that take up too much space—be VERY selective in what you quote.