Haidt claims that intuitions are ultimately in control and that reason plays a small role in determining our morality or convincing others

Haidt claims that intuitions are ultimately in control and that reason plays a small role in determining our morality or convincing others. What is his argument and evidence? Critique this claim by doing one or more of the following 1.Offering counterevidence 2. Suggesting harm or dangers inherent in his position 3. Giving an example that is problematic for Haidt's position 4. Or- Suppose you agree with Haidt? In this case you may add to his argument, provide useful tools or applications, and refute objections