Fill This Form To Receive Instant Help
Homework answers / question archive / Overview In this activity, you will consider how the analysis of your social, cultural, or global event where a technology plays a significant role might have turned out differently if you looked at it through a different lens
In this activity, you will consider how the analysis of your social, cultural, or global event where a technology plays a significant role might have turned out differently if you looked at it through a different lens. You will also consider how your critical analysis can help in interactions with others. Completing this activity will result in a draft of the second part of the reflection section of your project. It also provides an opportunity to obtain valuable feedback from your instructor that you can incorporate into your project submission.
In this activity, you will work on the second part of the reflection section of your project. You should consider the feedback from your instructor on the previous activity. Include diverse perspectives from varied sources to support your points. Look to the SNHU Shapiro Library for assistance and consider the sources you have used thus far to support your research.
You are not required to answer each question below the rubric criteria but may use them to better understand the criteria and guide your thinking.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
Submit your short paper as a 1- to 2-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Consult the Shapiro Library APA Style Guide for more information on citations.
Criteria | Proficient (100%) | Needs Improvement (75%) | Not Evident (0%) | Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reliable Evidence from Varied Sources | Integrates reliable evidence from varied sources throughout the paper to support analysis | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include drawing from a diverse pool of perspectives, using more varied sources to support the analysis, or integrating evidence and sources throughout the paper to support the analysis | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Different General Education Lens | Explains at least one way in which the analysis might have been different if another general education lens was used to analyze the technology’s role in the event | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting a different lens to technology’s role in the event or providing more support of that connection | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Interactions | Explains how analyzing the technology’s role in the event can help interactions with those of a different viewpoint, culture, or perspective | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors or omissions; areas for improvement may include connecting the critical analysis of a social, cultural, or global event where a technology plays a significant role to interactions with people with a different viewpoint, culture, or perspective, or providing more detail about that connection | Does not attempt criterion | 30 |
Articulation of Response | Clearly conveys meaning with correct grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, demonstrating an understanding of audience and purpose | Shows progress toward proficiency, but with errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, negatively impacting readability | Submission has critical errors in grammar, sentence structure, and spelling, preventing understanding of ideas | 5 |
Citations and Attributions | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with consistent minor errors | Uses citations for ideas requiring attribution, with major errors | Does not use citations for ideas requiring attribution | 5 |
Total: | 100% |